lity of work life (QoWL) among farmers in Thailand

Q4 Medicine
Rattanaporn Arsa, Apichet Jumniensuk, Jiaranai Pathomrotsakun, Phitchasuda Dechboon
{"title":"lity of work life (QoWL) among farmers in Thailand","authors":"Rattanaporn Arsa, Apichet Jumniensuk, Jiaranai Pathomrotsakun, Phitchasuda Dechboon","doi":"10.55131/jphd/2023/210222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Working conditions and quality of work life reflect a person’s overall quality of life and wellbeing. The purpose of this cross-sectional survey study was to investigate the working conditions, quality of work life, and related factors among farmers. The samples consisted of 445 farmers from the Wang Chin and Song Districts in Phrae Province, Thailand. Data collection was accomplished through a self-administered questionnaire. A structural equation model was specified to investigate the extent to which individual characteristics, interpersonal factors, and working conditions contribute to the quality of work life. More than half of the participants were (52.1%) men; the average age was 48.26 years; the average monthly income was 5,113.48 THB; 89% held debt; and 56.9% were landowners. Farmers’ perceptions of working conditions, namely, the physical, chemical, and ergonomic working environment were poor, and there was a significant risk of workplace accidents. The results revealed that the overall quality of work life among employees was moderate (82.9%). The causal model of the quality of work life was assessed and justified through SEM. The model fits well with the empirical data (GFI = 0.973, AGFI = 0.912, CFI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.062, SRMR = 0.053). A combination of marital status, relationships with family and peers, social support, the biological environment, and ergonomics explained 23.3% of the variation in the quality of work life. The findings indicate that government organizations involved in agricultural work should work with interdisciplinary groups to improve the quality of farmers’ working lives. It is recommended that a one-stop service center be established in an easily accessible area, as a resource for farmers to store their knowledge and gain inspiration. Farmers should be encouraged to work together to improve their ability to negotiate and the community’s ability to build a sustainable quality of life.","PeriodicalId":36393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55131/jphd/2023/210222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Working conditions and quality of work life reflect a person’s overall quality of life and wellbeing. The purpose of this cross-sectional survey study was to investigate the working conditions, quality of work life, and related factors among farmers. The samples consisted of 445 farmers from the Wang Chin and Song Districts in Phrae Province, Thailand. Data collection was accomplished through a self-administered questionnaire. A structural equation model was specified to investigate the extent to which individual characteristics, interpersonal factors, and working conditions contribute to the quality of work life. More than half of the participants were (52.1%) men; the average age was 48.26 years; the average monthly income was 5,113.48 THB; 89% held debt; and 56.9% were landowners. Farmers’ perceptions of working conditions, namely, the physical, chemical, and ergonomic working environment were poor, and there was a significant risk of workplace accidents. The results revealed that the overall quality of work life among employees was moderate (82.9%). The causal model of the quality of work life was assessed and justified through SEM. The model fits well with the empirical data (GFI = 0.973, AGFI = 0.912, CFI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.062, SRMR = 0.053). A combination of marital status, relationships with family and peers, social support, the biological environment, and ergonomics explained 23.3% of the variation in the quality of work life. The findings indicate that government organizations involved in agricultural work should work with interdisciplinary groups to improve the quality of farmers’ working lives. It is recommended that a one-stop service center be established in an easily accessible area, as a resource for farmers to store their knowledge and gain inspiration. Farmers should be encouraged to work together to improve their ability to negotiate and the community’s ability to build a sustainable quality of life.
泰国农民的工作寿命(QoWL)
工作条件和工作生活质量反映了一个人的整体生活质量和幸福感。摘要本研究旨在探讨农民的劳动条件、劳动生活品质及相关因素。样本包括来自泰国Phrae省Wang Chin和Song地区的445名农民。数据收集是通过一份自我管理的问卷完成的。采用结构方程模型研究了个体特征、人际关系因素和工作条件对工作生活质量的影响程度。超过一半的参与者是男性(52.1%);平均年龄48.26岁;平均月收入为5,113.48泰铢;89%持有债务;56.9%是土地所有者。农民对工作条件,即物理、化学和符合人体工程学的工作环境的认知较差,并且存在重大的工作场所事故风险。结果显示,员工的整体工作生活质量一般(82.9%)。通过扫描电镜对工作生活质量的因果模型进行了评估和验证。模型与实证数据拟合良好(GFI = 0.973, AGFI = 0.912, CFI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.062, SRMR = 0.053)。婚姻状况、与家人和同伴的关系、社会支持、生物环境和人体工程学的结合解释了23.3%的工作生活质量变化。研究结果表明,参与农业工作的政府组织应与跨学科小组合作,以改善农民的工作生活质量。建议在交通便利的地区建立一站式服务中心,作为农民储存知识和获取灵感的资源。应鼓励农民共同努力,提高他们谈判的能力和社区建设可持续高质量生活的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health and Development
Journal of Public Health and Development Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信