Effect of Scaling and Corrosion Inhibitors on the Static Adsorption of an Anionic Surfactant on a Carbonate Rock

M. Gutierrez, S. Gaona, Fernando Enrique Calvete, Jesús Botett, J. V. Ferrari
{"title":"Effect of Scaling and Corrosion Inhibitors on the Static Adsorption of an Anionic Surfactant on a Carbonate Rock","authors":"M. Gutierrez, S. Gaona, Fernando Enrique Calvete, Jesús Botett, J. V. Ferrari","doi":"10.2118/193546-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n About half of the world's oil reserves are in carbonate reservoirs, and most of these formations are mixed-wet or oil-wet and fractured, with extremely heterogeneous porosities and permeabilities. Implementation of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques in this kind of reservoir is essential to achieve peak oil production and increase the recovery factor. Chemical EOR (CEOR) processes have been studied for many years in carbonate reservoirs but are not usually economically viable. Surfactant flooding has been considered as one of the most promising techniques among the chemical recovery methods due to the capacity of some surfactants to alter the carbonate rocks' wettability. However, the process is economically feasible only when losses of surfactant caused by adsorption into the porous media are decreased. Adsorption of surfactants can be affected by the surface charge on the rock surface and fluid interfaces. In general, the adsorption of cationic surfactants on carbonates is lower in comparison with other surfactants. Nevertheless, the high cost of cationic surfactants compared to anionic ones has led to studies aiming to evaluate the injection of the latter in the presence of a sacrificial agent in order to reduce the adsorption caused by interaction between the negative charges of the surfactant and positive charges on the carbonate surface. This work aims to study the effect of the presence of two chemicals, normally applied as scaling and corrosion inhibitors, on reducing the static adsorption of an anionic sodium olefin sulfonate surfactant on a carbonate rock. Water soluble poly(sodium methacrylate) (PSM) and diethanolamine (DEA) were evaluated as sacrificial agents in concentrations close to their scaling and corrosion inhibitor functions, respectively, to verify their sacrificial role in a co-injection chemical scenario. Adsorption studies were carried out using a pulverized carbonate rock in which low-salinity water was used as the base medium. Aqueous stability tests were carried out, which made it possible to select the correct salinity for the solutions of surfactant. Surface tension measurements were used as an indirect approach to study the adsorption of the surfactant in the presence and absence of PSM and DEA. Individually, PSM presented the best performance in reducing the adsorption of the anionic surfactant, while the DEA showed an almost null effect. However, when the chemicals were mixed, a synergistic effect was observed. The performance of PSM can probably be attributed to a steric effect of an adsorbed layer of polymer. It will be shown that even at lower concentrations, co-injection chemicals which are used for targeting other issues, such as scaling and corrosion inhibitors, may play the role of a sacrificial agent in reducing the adsorption of anionic surfactants, which is a concern in application to carbonate reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":11243,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, April 09, 2019","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, April 09, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193546-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

About half of the world's oil reserves are in carbonate reservoirs, and most of these formations are mixed-wet or oil-wet and fractured, with extremely heterogeneous porosities and permeabilities. Implementation of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques in this kind of reservoir is essential to achieve peak oil production and increase the recovery factor. Chemical EOR (CEOR) processes have been studied for many years in carbonate reservoirs but are not usually economically viable. Surfactant flooding has been considered as one of the most promising techniques among the chemical recovery methods due to the capacity of some surfactants to alter the carbonate rocks' wettability. However, the process is economically feasible only when losses of surfactant caused by adsorption into the porous media are decreased. Adsorption of surfactants can be affected by the surface charge on the rock surface and fluid interfaces. In general, the adsorption of cationic surfactants on carbonates is lower in comparison with other surfactants. Nevertheless, the high cost of cationic surfactants compared to anionic ones has led to studies aiming to evaluate the injection of the latter in the presence of a sacrificial agent in order to reduce the adsorption caused by interaction between the negative charges of the surfactant and positive charges on the carbonate surface. This work aims to study the effect of the presence of two chemicals, normally applied as scaling and corrosion inhibitors, on reducing the static adsorption of an anionic sodium olefin sulfonate surfactant on a carbonate rock. Water soluble poly(sodium methacrylate) (PSM) and diethanolamine (DEA) were evaluated as sacrificial agents in concentrations close to their scaling and corrosion inhibitor functions, respectively, to verify their sacrificial role in a co-injection chemical scenario. Adsorption studies were carried out using a pulverized carbonate rock in which low-salinity water was used as the base medium. Aqueous stability tests were carried out, which made it possible to select the correct salinity for the solutions of surfactant. Surface tension measurements were used as an indirect approach to study the adsorption of the surfactant in the presence and absence of PSM and DEA. Individually, PSM presented the best performance in reducing the adsorption of the anionic surfactant, while the DEA showed an almost null effect. However, when the chemicals were mixed, a synergistic effect was observed. The performance of PSM can probably be attributed to a steric effect of an adsorbed layer of polymer. It will be shown that even at lower concentrations, co-injection chemicals which are used for targeting other issues, such as scaling and corrosion inhibitors, may play the role of a sacrificial agent in reducing the adsorption of anionic surfactants, which is a concern in application to carbonate reservoirs.
阻垢缓蚀剂对阴离子表面活性剂在碳酸盐岩上静态吸附的影响
世界上大约一半的石油储量位于碳酸盐岩储层中,这些储层大多为混合湿或油湿裂缝,孔隙度和渗透率极不均匀。在这类油藏中实施提高采收率(EOR)技术对于实现产油量峰值和提高采收率至关重要。在碳酸盐岩储层中,化学提高采收率(CEOR)方法已经研究多年,但通常在经济上不可行。由于表面活性剂能够改变碳酸盐岩的润湿性,因此表面活性剂驱已被认为是化学采收率方法中最有前途的技术之一。然而,只有当表面活性剂吸附到多孔介质中造成的损失减少时,该工艺才具有经济可行性。表面活性剂的吸附受岩石表面和流体界面上的表面电荷的影响。一般来说,阳离子表面活性剂在碳酸盐上的吸附比其他表面活性剂低。然而,与阴离子表面活性剂相比,阳离子表面活性剂的成本较高,因此有研究旨在评估在存在牺牲剂的情况下注射阳离子表面活性剂,以减少表面活性剂的负电荷与正电荷在碳酸盐表面相互作用引起的吸附。本研究旨在研究两种通常用作阻垢剂和缓蚀剂的化学物质的存在对减少阴离子烯烃磺酸钠表面活性剂在碳酸盐岩上的静态吸附的影响。为了验证水溶性聚甲基丙烯酸钠(PSM)和二乙醇胺(DEA)在共注射化学场景中的牺牲作用,研究人员分别在接近其阻垢和缓蚀剂功能的浓度下,对其作为牺牲剂进行了评估。用碳酸盐岩粉进行了吸附研究,其中以低盐度水作为基本介质。进行了水稳定性试验,为表面活性剂溶液的盐度选择提供了可能。采用表面张力测量作为间接方法研究了表面活性剂在PSM和DEA存在和不存在时的吸附行为。单独来看,PSM对阴离子表面活性剂的吸附效果最好,而DEA对阴离子表面活性剂的吸附效果几乎为零。然而,当化学物质混合时,观察到协同效应。PSM的性能可能归因于聚合物吸附层的位阻效应。研究表明,即使在较低的浓度下,用于其他问题(如阻垢剂和缓蚀剂)的共注入化学品也可能起到牺牲剂的作用,减少阴离子表面活性剂的吸附,这是碳酸盐储层应用中需要关注的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信