Pursuing Multiple Premiums: Combination vs. Integration

Mutual Funds Pub Date : 2021-02-26 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3793594
Wei Dai, N. Saito, Stephen Watson
{"title":"Pursuing Multiple Premiums: Combination vs. Integration","authors":"Wei Dai, N. Saito, Stephen Watson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3793594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares two different approaches to pursue multiple premiums: a combination approach (market portfolio plus factor portfolios) and a fully integrated approach. We evaluate the two approaches via multiple lenses: pursuit of higher expected returns, distribution of over- and underweights, turnover, and costs. Our analysis shows the integrated approach can lead to greater reliability of outperformance, better risk control, and lower costs. These benefits are critical to an efficient pursuit of multiple premiums and cannot be replicated through combination approaches.","PeriodicalId":18891,"journal":{"name":"Mutual Funds","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutual Funds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3793594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper compares two different approaches to pursue multiple premiums: a combination approach (market portfolio plus factor portfolios) and a fully integrated approach. We evaluate the two approaches via multiple lenses: pursuit of higher expected returns, distribution of over- and underweights, turnover, and costs. Our analysis shows the integrated approach can lead to greater reliability of outperformance, better risk control, and lower costs. These benefits are critical to an efficient pursuit of multiple premiums and cannot be replicated through combination approaches.
追求多重溢价:组合与整合
本文比较了追求多重溢价的两种不同方法:组合方法(市场投资组合加要素投资组合)和完全整合方法。我们从多个角度来评估这两种方法:追求更高的预期回报、增持和减持的分配、营业额和成本。我们的分析表明,集成方法可以带来更高的可靠性,更好的风险控制和更低的成本。这些好处对于有效地追求多重保费至关重要,并且不能通过组合方法复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信