Comparison of Wound Infection after Reversal of Loop Ileostomy in Linear versus Purse-String Skin Closure of Stoma Site

S. Haider, Muhammad Waqas Raza, Aurangzeb Khan, Munaima Khan, Khurram Waqas, Malik Irfan Ahmed
{"title":"Comparison of Wound Infection after Reversal of Loop Ileostomy in Linear versus Purse-String Skin Closure of Stoma Site","authors":"S. Haider, Muhammad Waqas Raza, Aurangzeb Khan, Munaima Khan, Khurram Waqas, Malik Irfan Ahmed","doi":"10.35787/jimdc.v12i2.948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Loop Ileostomy is a surgical procedure which is done to divert intestinal contents away from distal bowel to allow healing of the distal anastomosis and also for the relieve of obstruction in emergency situations. Reversal is done through local stoma site via linear closure technique as the standard procedure. Surgical site infection is the most commonly occurring & morbid complications of this technique and it can be reduced if closure is done by Purse string method.  The aim of this study was to determine the more effective method of the two in terms of post-op surgical site infection. \nMaterial & Methods: This Randomized Controlled Trial was conducted for six-month duration in Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi. Reversal patients presenting in outdoor-department were included and allocated randomly into either Purse-String closure group or linear skin closure group. Follow-up was done for thirty days and wound infection was identified by presence of purulent discharge from incision site. Organisms were isolated from fluid culture or tissue culture from the wound or abscess. \nResults: We included a total of 90 patients in this study. 45 patients were randomly alloted to each group. The two groups were matched for various entry parameters. Wound infection was observed among 27(60%) in the linear closure group whereas 12(26.7%) in the purse-string group developed wound infection. This difference was statistically significant. \nConclusion: Given the low rate of associated wound infection, purse string closure of stoma reversal is recommended to be the preferred procedure for ileostomy reversal. \nKey words: Loop Ileostomy, Linear closure, Purse string closure, Wound infection","PeriodicalId":33701,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamabad Medical and Dental College","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamabad Medical and Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35787/jimdc.v12i2.948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Loop Ileostomy is a surgical procedure which is done to divert intestinal contents away from distal bowel to allow healing of the distal anastomosis and also for the relieve of obstruction in emergency situations. Reversal is done through local stoma site via linear closure technique as the standard procedure. Surgical site infection is the most commonly occurring & morbid complications of this technique and it can be reduced if closure is done by Purse string method.  The aim of this study was to determine the more effective method of the two in terms of post-op surgical site infection. Material & Methods: This Randomized Controlled Trial was conducted for six-month duration in Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi. Reversal patients presenting in outdoor-department were included and allocated randomly into either Purse-String closure group or linear skin closure group. Follow-up was done for thirty days and wound infection was identified by presence of purulent discharge from incision site. Organisms were isolated from fluid culture or tissue culture from the wound or abscess. Results: We included a total of 90 patients in this study. 45 patients were randomly alloted to each group. The two groups were matched for various entry parameters. Wound infection was observed among 27(60%) in the linear closure group whereas 12(26.7%) in the purse-string group developed wound infection. This difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Given the low rate of associated wound infection, purse string closure of stoma reversal is recommended to be the preferred procedure for ileostomy reversal. Key words: Loop Ileostomy, Linear closure, Purse string closure, Wound infection
环形回肠造口逆转后创面感染的比较
简介:回肠袢造口术是一种外科手术,目的是将肠内容物从远端肠转移,使远端吻合口愈合,并在紧急情况下缓解梗阻。通过线性闭合技术通过局部造口部位进行逆转,作为标准程序。手术部位感染是该技术最常见和病态的并发症,如果采用荷包线方法关闭,可以减少手术部位感染。本研究的目的是确定两种方法在术后部位感染方面更有效的方法。材料与方法:本随机对照试验在拉瓦尔品第贝娜齐尔·布托医院进行,为期6个月。纳入在室外就诊的逆转患者,随机分为荷包缝合组和线性皮肤缝合组。随访30天,切口处出现脓性分泌物,确定伤口感染。从伤口或脓肿的液体培养或组织培养中分离出微生物。结果:本研究共纳入90例患者。45例患者随机分为两组。两组在不同的进入参数上进行了匹配。线形缝合组27例(60%)出现伤口感染,而荷包缝合组12例(26.7%)出现伤口感染。这一差异具有统计学意义。结论:考虑到术后伤口感染发生率低,建议回肠造口逆转术采用荷包束缝合术。关键词:回肠袢造口,线性闭合,荷包线闭合,伤口感染
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信