Fatigue at Work: Scale Validation with Airline Pilots

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting

BAR - Brazilian Administration Review Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-7692bar2020190031

Victor Rafael Rezende Celestino, J. BUCHER-MALUSCHKE, E. Marqueze

{"title":"Fatigue at Work: Scale Validation with Airline Pilots","authors":"Victor Rafael Rezende Celestino, J. BUCHER-MALUSCHKE, E. Marqueze","doi":"10.1590/1807-7692bar2020190031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the organizational context, the study of occupational stress encompasses constructs of fatigue at work. Within the air transportation sector, fatigue at work is a potential issue influencing both safety and occupational stress. The objective of the present study was to perform a convergent-discriminant validity analysis of the Feeling of Fatigue scale in the area of Administration. Data from an observational cross-sectional study involving a sample of 1,066 airline pilots were analyzed using quantitative modeling. Confirmatory factor analysis with the structural equations model was performed to determine the validity of a Portuguese version of the Feeling of Fatigue scale in the organizational context of civil aviation. This study fills a gap in the literature on occupational stress in Administration, highlighting the relevance of research on fatigue at work. The results confirmed the validity of a Portuguese version of a mature scale for subjective assessment of fatigue in Administration, thereby contributing to fatigue management in organizational settings.","PeriodicalId":53636,"journal":{"name":"BAR - Brazilian Administration Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BAR - Brazilian Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2020190031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the organizational context, the study of occupational stress encompasses constructs of fatigue at work. Within the air transportation sector, fatigue at work is a potential issue influencing both safety and occupational stress. The objective of the present study was to perform a convergent-discriminant validity analysis of the Feeling of Fatigue scale in the area of Administration. Data from an observational cross-sectional study involving a sample of 1,066 airline pilots were analyzed using quantitative modeling. Confirmatory factor analysis with the structural equations model was performed to determine the validity of a Portuguese version of the Feeling of Fatigue scale in the organizational context of civil aviation. This study fills a gap in the literature on occupational stress in Administration, highlighting the relevance of research on fatigue at work. The results confirmed the validity of a Portuguese version of a mature scale for subjective assessment of fatigue in Administration, thereby contributing to fatigue management in organizational settings.

查看原文本刊更多论文

工作疲劳:航空公司飞行员的规模验证

在组织背景下，职业压力的研究包括工作疲劳的构念。在航空运输部门，工作疲劳是影响安全和职业压力的潜在问题。本研究的目的是对管理领域的疲劳感觉量表进行收敛-判别效度分析。一项涉及1066名航空公司飞行员样本的观察性横断面研究的数据使用定量模型进行了分析。采用结构方程模型进行验证性因子分析，以确定葡萄牙语版疲劳感觉量表在民航组织背景下的有效性。本研究填补了行政管理中职业压力研究的空白，突出了工作疲劳研究的相关性。结果证实了葡萄牙语版本的行政工作疲劳主观评价量表的有效性，从而有助于组织环境中的疲劳管理。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

BAR - Brazilian Administration Review Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： Launched in 2004, BAR has an international scope in terms of topics of interest, target audience, and editorial boards. It is an A2-journal according to the Brazilian classification Qualis/Capes, which is thus a strong signal about the quality of published works and about the transparency of the editorial process. BAR follows the editorial principles available in document Best Practices of Scientific Publication, an initiative championed by the Brazilian Academy of Management (ANPAD) that seeks to assist journals to achieve high scholarly standards and enhance their impact as sources for theoretical and applied research. Furthermore, since 2013, BAR is a member of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics), what is another signal of efforts made towards adhering to the most rigorous ethical principles in academic publication.

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格