Averaging Gone Wrong: Using Time-Aware Analyses to Better Understand Behavior

Samuel Barbosa, D. Cosley, Amit Sharma, R. Cesar
{"title":"Averaging Gone Wrong: Using Time-Aware Analyses to Better Understand Behavior","authors":"Samuel Barbosa, D. Cosley, Amit Sharma, R. Cesar","doi":"10.1145/2872427.2883083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online communities provide a fertile ground for analyzing people's behavior and improving our understanding of social processes. Because both people and communities change over time, we argue that analyses of these communities that take time into account will lead to deeper and more accurate results. Using Reddit as an example, we study the evolution of users based on comment and submission data from 2007 to 2014. Even using one of the simplest temporal differences between users---yearly cohorts---we find wide differences in people's behavior, including comment activity, effort, and survival. Further, not accounting for time can lead us to misinterpret important phenomena. For instance, we observe that average comment length decreases over any fixed period of time, but comment length in each cohort of users steadily increases during the same period after an abrupt initial drop, an example of Simpson's Paradox. Dividing cohorts into sub-cohorts based on the survival time in the community provides further insights; in particular, longer-lived users start at a higher activity level and make more and shorter comments than those who leave earlier. These findings both give more insight into user evolution in Reddit in particular, and raise a number of interesting questions around studying online behavior going forward.","PeriodicalId":20455,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Online communities provide a fertile ground for analyzing people's behavior and improving our understanding of social processes. Because both people and communities change over time, we argue that analyses of these communities that take time into account will lead to deeper and more accurate results. Using Reddit as an example, we study the evolution of users based on comment and submission data from 2007 to 2014. Even using one of the simplest temporal differences between users---yearly cohorts---we find wide differences in people's behavior, including comment activity, effort, and survival. Further, not accounting for time can lead us to misinterpret important phenomena. For instance, we observe that average comment length decreases over any fixed period of time, but comment length in each cohort of users steadily increases during the same period after an abrupt initial drop, an example of Simpson's Paradox. Dividing cohorts into sub-cohorts based on the survival time in the community provides further insights; in particular, longer-lived users start at a higher activity level and make more and shorter comments than those who leave earlier. These findings both give more insight into user evolution in Reddit in particular, and raise a number of interesting questions around studying online behavior going forward.
平均出错:使用时间意识分析来更好地理解行为
在线社区为分析人们的行为和提高我们对社会过程的理解提供了肥沃的土壤。因为人和社区都会随着时间的推移而变化,我们认为,考虑到时间因素的社区分析将导致更深入、更准确的结果。以Reddit为例,我们基于2007 - 2014年的评论和提交数据研究了用户的演变。即使使用用户之间最简单的时间差异之一——每年的队列——我们也会发现人们的行为存在很大差异,包括评论活动、努力和生存。此外,不考虑时间会导致我们误解重要的现象。例如,我们观察到,平均评论长度在任何固定时间内都会减少,但每个用户群体的评论长度在最初突然下降后的同一时期内稳步增加,这是辛普森悖论的一个例子。根据在社区中的生存时间将队列划分为子队列提供了进一步的见解;特别是,较长寿的用户开始时的活跃度更高,发表的评论也更多、更短。这些发现不仅让我们对Reddit的用户进化有了更深入的了解,而且还提出了一些关于未来研究在线行为的有趣问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信