Celeste Echavarria, Sofia Bou, Favio Guzman, Cristian Assell, Juliana Nazaretto, Andrea Potes, Guillermo Barillaro
{"title":"Traumatismo Toracoabdominal Penetrante: Que Cavidad Operar Primero?","authors":"Celeste Echavarria, Sofia Bou, Favio Guzman, Cristian Assell, Juliana Nazaretto, Andrea Potes, Guillermo Barillaro","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10030-1318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"mortalidad. En el grupo II predominaron las HAF transfixiantes de la línea media. En 8 casos se registró un error al abordar primero la cavidad con lesiones menos graves (en 4 casos el tórax y en 4 casos el abdomen), falleciendo 7 de los mismos y determinando una mortalidad de 25,8% para el grupo II. El análisis del error en esos 8 casos hallo que en 5 fue potencialmente prevenible y que estuvo relacionado con resultados erróneos de la ecografía y/o subestimación del débito del drenaje pleural y de la radiografía de tórax post-drenaje pleural. Conclusione: Los pacientes con TTAP y hemodinámicamente compensados presentaron predominio de HCP del lado izquierdo y no tuvieron errores en el manejo secuencial de cavidades ni mortalidad. En cambio en aquellos con TTAP y shock, predominaron las HAF y los trayectos transfixiantes de la línea media, y este grupo fue el que tuvo exclusivamente los errores de manejo y la mortalidad. La mayoría de los errores en el manejo fueron considerados potencialmente prevenibles dado que se relacionaron con resultados falsos de la ecografía y con subestimación del débito del drenaje pleural y de la radiografía de tórax post–drenaje pleural. Characteristics of patients with PTAT with a sequence of combined surgical interventions. • Characteristics of the error due to inappropriate sequence of said operative procedures. • Relationship of these previous factors with mortality. Design: Observational retrospective. Materials and methods: Review of the medical records of the patients assisted in our institution between January 2005 and December 2018, with PTAT that required operative procedures both in the chest (pleural drainage or thoracotomy) and in the abdomen (laparotomy or laparoscopy). Results: Seventy-nine patients with PTAT, 48 with normal hemodynamics (group I) and 31 with hypovolemic shock (group II) were assisted. In group I, SW (40) predominated over GSW (8), and lesions on the left side (42) (87.5%). In this group, there were no errors in sequential surgical management and no mortality was recorded. In group II, transfixing GSW of the midline predominated. In eight cases, an error was recorded when first approaching the cavity with less serious injuries (in four cases the thorax and in four cases the abdomen), seven of them died and determining mortality of 25.8% for group II. The analysis of the error in these eight cases found that in five it was potentially preventable and that it was related to erroneous results of the ultrasound and/or underestimation of the output of the pleural drainage and of the post-pleural drainage chest radiograph. Conclusion: Patients with PTAT and hemodynamically compensated presented a predominance of left-sided SW and had no errors in the sequential management of cavities or mortality. On the other hand, in those with PTAT and shock, GSW and transfixing paths of the midline predominated, and this group was the one that had exclusively the handling errors and mortality. Most of the errors in management were considered potentially preventable since they were related to false results of the ultrasound and underestimation of the output of the pleural drainage and of the post-pleural drainage chest radiograph.","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"55 1","pages":"71-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10030-1318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
mortalidad. En el grupo II predominaron las HAF transfixiantes de la línea media. En 8 casos se registró un error al abordar primero la cavidad con lesiones menos graves (en 4 casos el tórax y en 4 casos el abdomen), falleciendo 7 de los mismos y determinando una mortalidad de 25,8% para el grupo II. El análisis del error en esos 8 casos hallo que en 5 fue potencialmente prevenible y que estuvo relacionado con resultados erróneos de la ecografía y/o subestimación del débito del drenaje pleural y de la radiografía de tórax post-drenaje pleural. Conclusione: Los pacientes con TTAP y hemodinámicamente compensados presentaron predominio de HCP del lado izquierdo y no tuvieron errores en el manejo secuencial de cavidades ni mortalidad. En cambio en aquellos con TTAP y shock, predominaron las HAF y los trayectos transfixiantes de la línea media, y este grupo fue el que tuvo exclusivamente los errores de manejo y la mortalidad. La mayoría de los errores en el manejo fueron considerados potencialmente prevenibles dado que se relacionaron con resultados falsos de la ecografía y con subestimación del débito del drenaje pleural y de la radiografía de tórax post–drenaje pleural. Characteristics of patients with PTAT with a sequence of combined surgical interventions. • Characteristics of the error due to inappropriate sequence of said operative procedures. • Relationship of these previous factors with mortality. Design: Observational retrospective. Materials and methods: Review of the medical records of the patients assisted in our institution between January 2005 and December 2018, with PTAT that required operative procedures both in the chest (pleural drainage or thoracotomy) and in the abdomen (laparotomy or laparoscopy). Results: Seventy-nine patients with PTAT, 48 with normal hemodynamics (group I) and 31 with hypovolemic shock (group II) were assisted. In group I, SW (40) predominated over GSW (8), and lesions on the left side (42) (87.5%). In this group, there were no errors in sequential surgical management and no mortality was recorded. In group II, transfixing GSW of the midline predominated. In eight cases, an error was recorded when first approaching the cavity with less serious injuries (in four cases the thorax and in four cases the abdomen), seven of them died and determining mortality of 25.8% for group II. The analysis of the error in these eight cases found that in five it was potentially preventable and that it was related to erroneous results of the ultrasound and/or underestimation of the output of the pleural drainage and of the post-pleural drainage chest radiograph. Conclusion: Patients with PTAT and hemodynamically compensated presented a predominance of left-sided SW and had no errors in the sequential management of cavities or mortality. On the other hand, in those with PTAT and shock, GSW and transfixing paths of the midline predominated, and this group was the one that had exclusively the handling errors and mortality. Most of the errors in management were considered potentially preventable since they were related to false results of the ultrasound and underestimation of the output of the pleural drainage and of the post-pleural drainage chest radiograph.
致病性第一组以中线转移HAF为主。8例患者在第一次处理腔体时出现错误,但病变不太严重(4例胸部,4例腹部),其中7例死亡,第二组死亡率为25.8%。对这8例病例的错误分析发现,其中5例是可以预防的,与超声结果错误和/或低估胸膜引流流量和胸膜引流后胸片有关。我们的研究结果表明,TTAP和血流动力学补偿的患者在左侧HCP占优势,在腔的顺序处理和死亡率方面没有错误。然而,在TTAP和休克患者中,HAF和中线转移路径占主导地位,这一组只出现了处理错误和死亡率。由于超声检查结果不准确,胸膜引流和胸膜引流后胸片的输出被低估,因此大多数处理错误被认为是可以预防的。采用一系列联合手术干预的PTAT患者特征。由于上述操作程序顺序不适当而造成的错误的特点。•上述因素与死亡率的关系。设计:回顾性观察。材料和方法:回顾2005年1月至2018年12月期间在我院就诊的患者的医疗记录,这些患者需要在胸部(胸膜引流或胸腔切开术)和腹部(腹腔镜或腹腔镜)进行手术。结果:79例PTAT患者,48例血流动力学正常(I组),31例低血容量休克(II组)。在第一组中,SW(40)高于GSW(8),左侧病变(42)(87.5%)。= =地理根据美国人口普查局的数据,这个县的总面积,其中土地和(1.1%)水。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,该镇的总面积为,其中土地和(3.064平方公里)水。在8例病例中,第一次接近腔体时出现错误,造成的伤害较轻(4例是胸部,4例是腹部),其中7例死亡,第二组的死亡率为25.8%。对这8个病例的错误分析发现,其中5个病例的错误是可以预防的,并且与超声检查和/或低估胸膜引流和胸膜引流后胸部x线片的输出有关。结论:PTAT和血动力代偿患者以左西南为主,在腔的顺序管理和死亡率方面无错误。On the other hand,这些临时和冲击,GSW transfixing paths of the midline predominated, and this group was the one that exclusively不确定性handling和死亡率。大多数管理错误被认为是可以预防的,因为它们与超声造影的错误结果以及对胸膜引流和胸膜引流后胸部x光片输出的低估有关。