Money laundering in a CBDC World: A Game of Cats and Mice

Daniel Dupuis
{"title":"Money laundering in a CBDC World: A Game of Cats and Mice","authors":"Daniel Dupuis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3793713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThe purpose of this study is to describe the present taxonomy of money, summarize potential central bank digital currency (CBDC) regimes that central banks worldwide could adopt and explore the implications of the introduction of each of these CDBC regimes for money laundering through the lens of the regulatory dialectic theory.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe methodology used in the analysis of significant recent events regarding the progress of central banks in establishing a CBDC and the implications for money laundering under a CBDC regime. This paper also reviews the literature regarding the Regulatory Dialectic to highlight potential innovative responses of money launderers to circumvent the controls generated through the implementation of a CBDC.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study examines the impact of Kane’s regulatory dialectic paradigm on the feasibility of money laundering under a CBDC regime and identifies potential avenues that would be available for those seeking to launder money, based on the form a CBDC would take.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis paper is unable as of yet to empirically evaluate anti-money laundering (AML) tactics under a CBDC regime as it has not yet been fully implemented.\n\n\nPractical implications\nMany central banks worldwide are evaluating the structure of and introduction of a CBDC. There are a number of forms that a CBDC could take, each of which has implications for individual privacy and for entities involved in AML efforts within financial institutions and the regulatory community. The paper has implications for AML experts who are considering how AML procedures would change under a CBDC regime.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe regulatory dialectic predicts that regulatory response reactive, rather than proactive when it comes to socially undesirable phenomena. As central banks and governments seek to divert economic activity away from the laundering of the proceeds of illicit activity, there are tradeoffs in terms of a loss of privacy. The regulatory dialectic predicts a corresponding innovative response of those who wish to undermine the controls generated through the establishment of a CBDC.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to explore the impact of a potential CBDC on money laundering and the potential innovative circumventions within the paradigm of the Regulatory Dialectic.","PeriodicalId":20999,"journal":{"name":"Regulation of Financial Institutions eJournal","volume":"352 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulation of Financial Institutions eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3793713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to describe the present taxonomy of money, summarize potential central bank digital currency (CBDC) regimes that central banks worldwide could adopt and explore the implications of the introduction of each of these CDBC regimes for money laundering through the lens of the regulatory dialectic theory. Design/methodology/approach The methodology used in the analysis of significant recent events regarding the progress of central banks in establishing a CBDC and the implications for money laundering under a CBDC regime. This paper also reviews the literature regarding the Regulatory Dialectic to highlight potential innovative responses of money launderers to circumvent the controls generated through the implementation of a CBDC. Findings This study examines the impact of Kane’s regulatory dialectic paradigm on the feasibility of money laundering under a CBDC regime and identifies potential avenues that would be available for those seeking to launder money, based on the form a CBDC would take. Research limitations/implications This paper is unable as of yet to empirically evaluate anti-money laundering (AML) tactics under a CBDC regime as it has not yet been fully implemented. Practical implications Many central banks worldwide are evaluating the structure of and introduction of a CBDC. There are a number of forms that a CBDC could take, each of which has implications for individual privacy and for entities involved in AML efforts within financial institutions and the regulatory community. The paper has implications for AML experts who are considering how AML procedures would change under a CBDC regime. Social implications The regulatory dialectic predicts that regulatory response reactive, rather than proactive when it comes to socially undesirable phenomena. As central banks and governments seek to divert economic activity away from the laundering of the proceeds of illicit activity, there are tradeoffs in terms of a loss of privacy. The regulatory dialectic predicts a corresponding innovative response of those who wish to undermine the controls generated through the establishment of a CBDC. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to explore the impact of a potential CBDC on money laundering and the potential innovative circumventions within the paradigm of the Regulatory Dialectic.
CBDC世界中的洗钱:猫捉老鼠的游戏
本研究的目的是描述当前的货币分类,总结世界各国央行可能采用的潜在央行数字货币(CBDC)制度,并通过监管辩证法理论的视角探讨引入每种CBDC制度对洗钱的影响。设计/方法/方法用于分析有关中央银行在建立CBDC方面取得进展的近期重大事件以及CBDC制度下对洗钱的影响的方法。本文还回顾了有关监管辩证法的文献,以突出洗钱者规避通过实施CBDC产生的控制的潜在创新反应。本研究考察了Kane的监管辩证法范式对CBDC制度下洗钱可行性的影响,并根据CBDC的形式确定了那些寻求洗钱的人可以使用的潜在途径。研究限制/影响本文尚未对CBDC制度下的反洗钱(AML)策略进行实证评估,因为它尚未完全实施。全球许多央行正在评估CBDC的结构和引入。CBDC可以采取多种形式,每种形式都对个人隐私以及金融机构和监管界参与“反洗钱”工作的实体产生影响。这篇论文对正在考虑在CBDC制度下“反洗钱”程序将如何变化的“反洗钱”专家有影响。社会影响监管辩证法预测,当涉及到社会不良现象时,监管反应是被动的,而不是主动的。随着中央银行和政府寻求将经济活动从非法活动收益的洗钱中转移出来,在隐私丧失方面存在权衡。监管辩证法预测,那些希望破坏通过建立CBDC产生的控制的人会做出相应的创新反应。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一篇探讨潜在的CBDC对洗钱的影响以及在监管辩证法范式内潜在的创新规避的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信