Normalized Modulus Reduction and Damping Ratio Curves for Bay of Campeche Calcareous Clay to Carbonate Mud

V. M. Taboada, S. Cao, F. A. F. López, D. C. Roque, P. B. Nabor
{"title":"Normalized Modulus Reduction and Damping Ratio Curves for Bay of Campeche Calcareous Clay to Carbonate Mud","authors":"V. M. Taboada, S. Cao, F. A. F. López, D. C. Roque, P. B. Nabor","doi":"10.4043/31153-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Equations to calculate the modulus reduction curve (G/Gmax-γ) and material damping ratio curve (D-γ) of calcareous clay and clayey carbonate mud of the Bay of Campeche and Tabasco Coastline are developed. This was achieved using a database of 156 resonant column tests and 468 strain-controlled cyclic direct simple shear tests performed in clays with 10 % ≤ CaCO3 ≤90 %. The effects of carbonate content (CaCO3), mean effective confining pressure (σ′m), plasticity index (PI), and overconsolidation ratio (OCR) on the shape of the modulus reduction and material damping ratio curves are shown based on the available laboratory data and the equations developed to calculate these curves. It is shown that as CaCO3 increases, the normalized shear modulus (G/Gmax) curve tends to shift downward and the damping ratio (D) curve tends to shift upward; as σ′m and PI increase, the G/Gmax curve tends to shift upward and the damping ratio curve tends to shift downward; and the value of OCR has practically no effect on the position of the curves. The validation of the calculated values of G/Gmax and D shows the best predictions are found at low shear strains for G/Gmax and at large shear strains for D, falling within ± 25 % of the measured values, and shows that due to limitations in the model at large strains (γ > 1 %) for G/Gmax and at low strains (γ < 0.05 %) for D, the calculated values fall within ± 50 % of the measured values. The equations developed to calculate the curves of G/Gmax-γ and D-γ of calcareous clay and clayey carbonate mud are recommended for preliminary or perhaps even final seismic site response evaluations. However, considering the scatter of the data points around the curves, the equations should be used with caution, and parametric and sensitivity studies are strongly recommended to assess the importance of this scatter. In large critical projects, direct experimental determinations of G/Gmax and D for the soils of interest are suggested to be more appropriate.","PeriodicalId":11072,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, August 16, 2021","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, August 16, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31153-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Equations to calculate the modulus reduction curve (G/Gmax-γ) and material damping ratio curve (D-γ) of calcareous clay and clayey carbonate mud of the Bay of Campeche and Tabasco Coastline are developed. This was achieved using a database of 156 resonant column tests and 468 strain-controlled cyclic direct simple shear tests performed in clays with 10 % ≤ CaCO3 ≤90 %. The effects of carbonate content (CaCO3), mean effective confining pressure (σ′m), plasticity index (PI), and overconsolidation ratio (OCR) on the shape of the modulus reduction and material damping ratio curves are shown based on the available laboratory data and the equations developed to calculate these curves. It is shown that as CaCO3 increases, the normalized shear modulus (G/Gmax) curve tends to shift downward and the damping ratio (D) curve tends to shift upward; as σ′m and PI increase, the G/Gmax curve tends to shift upward and the damping ratio curve tends to shift downward; and the value of OCR has practically no effect on the position of the curves. The validation of the calculated values of G/Gmax and D shows the best predictions are found at low shear strains for G/Gmax and at large shear strains for D, falling within ± 25 % of the measured values, and shows that due to limitations in the model at large strains (γ > 1 %) for G/Gmax and at low strains (γ < 0.05 %) for D, the calculated values fall within ± 50 % of the measured values. The equations developed to calculate the curves of G/Gmax-γ and D-γ of calcareous clay and clayey carbonate mud are recommended for preliminary or perhaps even final seismic site response evaluations. However, considering the scatter of the data points around the curves, the equations should be used with caution, and parametric and sensitivity studies are strongly recommended to assess the importance of this scatter. In large critical projects, direct experimental determinations of G/Gmax and D for the soils of interest are suggested to be more appropriate.
坎佩切湾钙质粘土-碳酸盐泥浆归一化模量折减及阻尼比曲线
建立了坎佩切湾和塔巴斯科海岸钙质粘土和粘性碳酸盐泥浆的模量衰减曲线(G/Gmax-γ)和材料阻尼比曲线(D-γ)的计算公式。这是通过在10%≤CaCO3≤90%的粘土中进行的156次共振柱试验和468次应变控制循环直接单剪试验的数据库实现的。根据实验数据和建立的计算公式,给出了碳酸盐含量(CaCO3)、平均有效围压(σ’m)、塑性指数(PI)和超固结比(OCR)对模量衰减曲线和材料阻尼比曲线形状的影响。结果表明:随着CaCO3的增加,归一化剪切模量(G/Gmax)曲线呈下移趋势,阻尼比(D)曲线呈上移趋势;随着σ’m和PI的增大,G/Gmax曲线呈上移趋势,阻尼比曲线呈下移趋势;OCR的值对曲线的位置几乎没有影响。对G/Gmax和D计算值的验证表明,对G/Gmax和D的最佳预测是在低剪切应变和大剪切应变下,落在实测值的±25%以内,并且由于模型在G/Gmax的大应变(γ > 1%)和D的低应变(γ < 0.05)下的限制,计算值落在实测值的±50%以内。为计算钙质粘土和粘性碳酸盐泥浆的G/Gmax-γ和D-γ曲线而开发的方程被推荐用于初步甚至可能是最终的地震现场反应评价。然而,考虑到数据点在曲线周围的分散,应该谨慎使用这些方程,强烈建议进行参数化和敏感性研究,以评估这种分散的重要性。在大型关键项目中,建议对感兴趣的土壤进行G/Gmax和D的直接实验测定更为合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信