Peter G Rose, Shamshad Ali, Mehdi Moslemi-Kebria, Fiona Simpkins
{"title":"Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab in Advanced and Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma.","authors":"Peter G Rose, Shamshad Ali, Mehdi Moslemi-Kebria, Fiona Simpkins","doi":"10.1097/IGC.0000000000000891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adding bevacizumab to paclitaxel and carboplatin and as maintenance in a larger cohort of patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified endometrial cancer patients treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m per 3 hours), carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) and maintenance bevacizumab treated in a post-protocol treatment cohort and evaluated them with our previously published phase 2 trial of this regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven additional patients were identified; 19 received the regimen as first-line therapy, and 8 received the regimen as second-line therapy after prior paclitaxel and carboplatin. The 19 patients who received first-line therapy were analyzed alone and with the 15 patients enrolled on protocol. The 2 cohorts were similar with respect to risk factors. Overall survival curves were not statistically different between the protocol and the postprotocol patients (log-rank test; P > 0.1). Collectively, a total of 266 courses (median, 6 courses; range, 1-20 courses) of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab combination therapy and 305 courses (median, 16 courses; range, 0-45courses) of bevacizumab maintenance therapy were administered as first-line therapy. Collectively, the median progression-free survival was 20 months, and median overall survival was 56 months. Among 29 patients with measurable disease, the response rate was 82.8% (95% confidence interval, 69.0%-96.5%; 15 complete responses and 9 partial responses). Among the 8 patients who received paclitaxel and carboplatin and bevacizumab as second-line therapy after paclitaxel and carboplatin, the response rate was 87.5% (6 complete responses, 1 partial response). Their median progression-free survival and median overall survival were not reached after a median follow-up of 23.5 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there are inherent limitations to small retrospective studies, this second analysis confirms the high response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival in the bevacizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin regimen as first-line therapy in advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":13983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","volume":"6 1","pages":"452-458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adding bevacizumab to paclitaxel and carboplatin and as maintenance in a larger cohort of patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma.
Methods: We retrospectively identified endometrial cancer patients treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m per 3 hours), carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) and maintenance bevacizumab treated in a post-protocol treatment cohort and evaluated them with our previously published phase 2 trial of this regimen.
Results: Twenty-seven additional patients were identified; 19 received the regimen as first-line therapy, and 8 received the regimen as second-line therapy after prior paclitaxel and carboplatin. The 19 patients who received first-line therapy were analyzed alone and with the 15 patients enrolled on protocol. The 2 cohorts were similar with respect to risk factors. Overall survival curves were not statistically different between the protocol and the postprotocol patients (log-rank test; P > 0.1). Collectively, a total of 266 courses (median, 6 courses; range, 1-20 courses) of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab combination therapy and 305 courses (median, 16 courses; range, 0-45courses) of bevacizumab maintenance therapy were administered as first-line therapy. Collectively, the median progression-free survival was 20 months, and median overall survival was 56 months. Among 29 patients with measurable disease, the response rate was 82.8% (95% confidence interval, 69.0%-96.5%; 15 complete responses and 9 partial responses). Among the 8 patients who received paclitaxel and carboplatin and bevacizumab as second-line therapy after paclitaxel and carboplatin, the response rate was 87.5% (6 complete responses, 1 partial response). Their median progression-free survival and median overall survival were not reached after a median follow-up of 23.5 months.
Conclusions: Although there are inherent limitations to small retrospective studies, this second analysis confirms the high response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival in the bevacizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin regimen as first-line therapy in advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma.