An Adaptive Hybrid Outdoor Propagation Loss Prediction Modelling for Effective Cellular Systems Network Planning and Optimization

Q3 Computer Science
Ikechi Risi, C. Ogbonda, F. B. Sigalo, Isabona Joseph
{"title":"An Adaptive Hybrid Outdoor Propagation Loss Prediction Modelling for Effective Cellular Systems Network Planning and Optimization","authors":"Ikechi Risi, C. Ogbonda, F. B. Sigalo, Isabona Joseph","doi":"10.5815/ijisa.2023.04.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The frequent poor service network experienced by some mobile phone users within some deadlock areas in Nigeria is an issue which has been identified by different researchers due to wrong positioning and planning of the evolved NodeB (eNodeB) transmitter using existing propagation loss models. To effectively contribute towards this potential issue constantly experienced in some part of Nigeria, an adaptive hybrid propagation loss model that is based on wavelet transform and genetic algorithm methods has been developed for cellular network planning and optimization, with the capacity to resolve the problems absolutely. First, the signal strengths were measured within four selected eNodeB cell sites in long term evolution (LTE) at 2600MHz using drive-test method. Secondly, the measured data were denoised through wavelet tools. Thirdly, COST231 model was optimize and deduced to generic model with parameters. Fourthly, genetic optimization algorithm automatically developed the propagation loss models for denoised signal data (designated as wavelet-GA model) and unprocessed signal data (designated as GA model). The hybrid wavelet-GA propagation loss model, GA propagation loss model, and COST231 propagation loss model were compared based on three error metrics such as root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and correlation coefficient (R). The developed hybrid wavelet-GA model estimated the lowest RMSEs of 2.8813 dB, 3.9381 dB, 4.7643 dB, 6.9366 dB, whereas, COST231 model gave highest value of RMSE. The developed hybrid wavelet-GA model also derived the least value of MAE as compared with COST231 and the GA models, such as, 2.2016 dB, 2.8672 dB, 3.4766 dB, 5.8235 dB. The correlation coefficients were also compared, and it showed that the developed hybrid wavelet-GA model were 90.04%, 78.61%, 92.21% and 91.23% for the four cell sites. The developed hybrid wavelet-GA model was also validated to account for the performance level by checking for the correlation coefficient using another measured signal data from different eNodeB cell sites other than the once used for the developed of the hybrid wavelet-GA model. It was noticed that the developed hybrid wavelet-GA propagation loss model is 97.41% valid. Existing standard COST231 model are not able to predict propagation loss with high level of accuracy, as such not efficient to be applied within part of Port Harcourt, Nigeria. The proposed hybrid wavelet-GA model has proven to achieve high performance level and it is relevant to be utilized for cellular network planning and optimization. In future purposes, more regions and locations should be considered to form a broader view in the development of more robust propagation loss models.","PeriodicalId":14067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2023.04.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The frequent poor service network experienced by some mobile phone users within some deadlock areas in Nigeria is an issue which has been identified by different researchers due to wrong positioning and planning of the evolved NodeB (eNodeB) transmitter using existing propagation loss models. To effectively contribute towards this potential issue constantly experienced in some part of Nigeria, an adaptive hybrid propagation loss model that is based on wavelet transform and genetic algorithm methods has been developed for cellular network planning and optimization, with the capacity to resolve the problems absolutely. First, the signal strengths were measured within four selected eNodeB cell sites in long term evolution (LTE) at 2600MHz using drive-test method. Secondly, the measured data were denoised through wavelet tools. Thirdly, COST231 model was optimize and deduced to generic model with parameters. Fourthly, genetic optimization algorithm automatically developed the propagation loss models for denoised signal data (designated as wavelet-GA model) and unprocessed signal data (designated as GA model). The hybrid wavelet-GA propagation loss model, GA propagation loss model, and COST231 propagation loss model were compared based on three error metrics such as root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and correlation coefficient (R). The developed hybrid wavelet-GA model estimated the lowest RMSEs of 2.8813 dB, 3.9381 dB, 4.7643 dB, 6.9366 dB, whereas, COST231 model gave highest value of RMSE. The developed hybrid wavelet-GA model also derived the least value of MAE as compared with COST231 and the GA models, such as, 2.2016 dB, 2.8672 dB, 3.4766 dB, 5.8235 dB. The correlation coefficients were also compared, and it showed that the developed hybrid wavelet-GA model were 90.04%, 78.61%, 92.21% and 91.23% for the four cell sites. The developed hybrid wavelet-GA model was also validated to account for the performance level by checking for the correlation coefficient using another measured signal data from different eNodeB cell sites other than the once used for the developed of the hybrid wavelet-GA model. It was noticed that the developed hybrid wavelet-GA propagation loss model is 97.41% valid. Existing standard COST231 model are not able to predict propagation loss with high level of accuracy, as such not efficient to be applied within part of Port Harcourt, Nigeria. The proposed hybrid wavelet-GA model has proven to achieve high performance level and it is relevant to be utilized for cellular network planning and optimization. In future purposes, more regions and locations should be considered to form a broader view in the development of more robust propagation loss models.
有效蜂窝系统网络规划与优化的自适应混合室外传播损耗预测模型
在尼日利亚的一些死锁区域内,一些移动电话用户经常遇到服务网络差的问题,这是一个由不同的研究人员发现的问题,原因是使用现有的传播损耗模型对改进的NodeB (eNodeB)发射机进行了错误的定位和规划。为了有效解决尼日利亚部分地区经常遇到的这一潜在问题,开发了一种基于小波变换和遗传算法的自适应混合传播损失模型,用于蜂窝网络规划和优化,具有绝对解决问题的能力。首先,采用驱动测试方法,在2600MHz长期演进(LTE)的四个选定的eNodeB蜂窝站点内测量信号强度。其次,利用小波工具对实测数据进行去噪处理;再次,对COST231模型进行优化,并将其推导为带参数的通用模型。第四,遗传优化算法自动建立去噪信号数据(称为小波遗传算法模型)和未处理信号数据(称为遗传算法模型)的传播损失模型。基于均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和相关系数(R) 3个误差指标对混合小波-遗传传播损耗模型、遗传传播损耗模型和COST231传播损耗模型进行了比较,发现混合小波-遗传模型的最小RMSE分别为2.8813 dB、3.9381 dB、4.7643 dB和6.9366 dB,而COST231模型的RMSE最高。与COST231和GA模型(2.2016 dB、2.8672 dB、3.4766 dB、5.8235 dB)相比,所建立的混合小波-GA模型的MAE值最小。结果表明,所建立的混合小波-遗传模型对4个细胞位点的相关系数分别为90.04%、78.61%、92.21%和91.23%。通过检查来自不同eNodeB小区的其他测量信号数据(而不是用于开发混合小波-遗传模型的数据)的相关系数,还验证了所开发的混合小波-遗传模型的性能水平。结果表明,所建立的小波-遗传算法混合传播损耗模型的有效性为97.41%。现有的标准COST231模型无法高精度地预测传播损失,因此在尼日利亚哈科特港部分地区应用效率不高。所提出的混合小波-遗传算法模型具有较高的性能水平,可用于蜂窝网络的规划和优化。在未来的目的中,应该考虑更多的区域和位置,以便在开发更鲁棒的传播损失模型时形成更广阔的视野。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering Computer Science-Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信