Preferences of Academic Researches and Pattern of Utilization of Behavior Laboratory Science for Preclinical Researches - a Cross Sectional Study

B. Alghamdi
{"title":"Preferences of Academic Researches and Pattern of Utilization of Behavior Laboratory Science for Preclinical Researches - a Cross Sectional Study","authors":"B. Alghamdi","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2019.73.222-227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Several studies confirmed the relation between mortality, behavioral and social factors and emphasized the importance of behavioral and social science to public health practice. Aim: This study aimed to determine the preferences of the researchers who utilize the behavioral sciences laboratory at the Preclinical Research Unit and define the patter of laboratory utilization in order to maximize the benefits gained from it. Methods: This cross sectional study conducted at the KFMRC, KAU, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in 2018 on the researchers who visited the behavior research laboratory between October 2018 and December 2018. A structured self-administered questionnaire was utilized to collect the demographic data and preferences of the participants and the pattern of utilization of the behavior science laboratory. The response rate was 100%. The Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21. Results: About 47% of the participants were working at the faculty of medicine (FOM) and about 47% were assistant professor. About 53 had previously conducted researches in behaviors science field. The majority of the participants were interested in memory field (about 57%) followed by the social field (20%). The least attractive field were the nutritional and anxiety (1.4%). The percent of non-medical researchers who had no interest in co-ordination field was significantly higher (p=0.041) compared to the medical/paramedical specialists. Conclusion: This study shed the light on the relative reduced interest in behavior researches among the academic researchers. There is need for more orientation programs and campaigns to raise the awareness of the importance of behaviors researches laboratories and researches.","PeriodicalId":18414,"journal":{"name":"Medical Archives","volume":"13 1","pages":"222 - 227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2019.73.222-227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Several studies confirmed the relation between mortality, behavioral and social factors and emphasized the importance of behavioral and social science to public health practice. Aim: This study aimed to determine the preferences of the researchers who utilize the behavioral sciences laboratory at the Preclinical Research Unit and define the patter of laboratory utilization in order to maximize the benefits gained from it. Methods: This cross sectional study conducted at the KFMRC, KAU, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in 2018 on the researchers who visited the behavior research laboratory between October 2018 and December 2018. A structured self-administered questionnaire was utilized to collect the demographic data and preferences of the participants and the pattern of utilization of the behavior science laboratory. The response rate was 100%. The Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21. Results: About 47% of the participants were working at the faculty of medicine (FOM) and about 47% were assistant professor. About 53 had previously conducted researches in behaviors science field. The majority of the participants were interested in memory field (about 57%) followed by the social field (20%). The least attractive field were the nutritional and anxiety (1.4%). The percent of non-medical researchers who had no interest in co-ordination field was significantly higher (p=0.041) compared to the medical/paramedical specialists. Conclusion: This study shed the light on the relative reduced interest in behavior researches among the academic researchers. There is need for more orientation programs and campaigns to raise the awareness of the importance of behaviors researches laboratories and researches.
学术研究的偏好与行为实验室科学在临床前研究中的应用模式-一项横断面研究
几项研究证实了死亡率与行为和社会因素之间的关系,并强调了行为和社会科学对公共卫生实践的重要性。目的:本研究旨在确定临床前研究单位行为科学实验室使用人员的偏好,并确定实验室使用模式,以最大限度地从中获得利益。方法:本横断面研究于2018年在沙特阿拉伯吉达KAU KFMRC对2018年10月至2018年12月访问行为研究实验室的研究人员进行。采用结构化的自填问卷收集了参与者的人口统计数据和偏好,以及行为科学实验室的使用模式。应答率为100%。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)第21版对数据进行分析。结果:约47%的参与者在医学院工作,约47%的参与者是助理教授。约53人曾从事行为科学领域的研究。大多数参与者对记忆领域感兴趣(约57%),其次是社交领域(20%)。最不受欢迎的领域是营养和焦虑(1.4%)。对协调领域不感兴趣的非医学研究人员的百分比明显高于医学/辅助医学专家(p=0.041)。结论:本研究揭示了学术研究者对行为研究兴趣的相对降低。需要更多的定向项目和活动来提高人们对行为研究、实验室和研究重要性的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信