Application and testing of RFID Software-Based Shielding in real fashion retail stores

IF 1.6 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Davide Mezzogori, A. Rizzi, Giovanni Romagnoli, Mirco Rosa
{"title":"Application and testing of RFID Software-Based Shielding in real fashion retail stores","authors":"Davide Mezzogori, A. Rizzi, Giovanni Romagnoli, Mirco Rosa","doi":"10.3233/rft-230020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: The present paper investigates the real performances of Software-Based Shielding (SBS) in two different stores of fashion retailers located in Northern Italy. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The study is based on a double case study analysis. Six different factors have been chosen, with two levels each. Namely, we investigated two different (i) stores; (ii) reader models; (iii) power levels; (iv) classification methods; (v) training data sets and (vi) settings of reference tags. The results have been evaluated in terms of overall and specific accuracies, and in percentage of false front (i.e., tags wrongly located in the sales floor area). FINDINGS: SBS proves to be a sound method for classifying tags’ location during normal operations in real-life stores, with overall accuracy up to 0.95. Of the two readers, reader A shows better results in terms of both overall and front accuracy, whereas reader B performs better in terms of rear accuracy and percentage of false front. With respect to the classification method, the combination of Neural Network with reads from reader A provides the best results. With respect to the training data, the use of front and back reads for training performs mostly better than the training with sole front data. ORIGINALITY: We are not aware of any other study that performed and reported results of SBS testing under normal operations in real stores. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one to report such results. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS: Main limitations of our research are the limited set of factors and levels, and the specific Logistic Regression and Neural Network methods that we used. Also, we did not consider tags disposition and density in our study. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: We prove that SBS is a feasible option that could replace physical shielding in retail stores. We call to action for further research on this topic, and for retailers to test it in different store locations.","PeriodicalId":42288,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of RF Technologies-Research and Applications","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of RF Technologies-Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/rft-230020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present paper investigates the real performances of Software-Based Shielding (SBS) in two different stores of fashion retailers located in Northern Italy. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The study is based on a double case study analysis. Six different factors have been chosen, with two levels each. Namely, we investigated two different (i) stores; (ii) reader models; (iii) power levels; (iv) classification methods; (v) training data sets and (vi) settings of reference tags. The results have been evaluated in terms of overall and specific accuracies, and in percentage of false front (i.e., tags wrongly located in the sales floor area). FINDINGS: SBS proves to be a sound method for classifying tags’ location during normal operations in real-life stores, with overall accuracy up to 0.95. Of the two readers, reader A shows better results in terms of both overall and front accuracy, whereas reader B performs better in terms of rear accuracy and percentage of false front. With respect to the classification method, the combination of Neural Network with reads from reader A provides the best results. With respect to the training data, the use of front and back reads for training performs mostly better than the training with sole front data. ORIGINALITY: We are not aware of any other study that performed and reported results of SBS testing under normal operations in real stores. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one to report such results. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS: Main limitations of our research are the limited set of factors and levels, and the specific Logistic Regression and Neural Network methods that we used. Also, we did not consider tags disposition and density in our study. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: We prove that SBS is a feasible option that could replace physical shielding in retail stores. We call to action for further research on this topic, and for retailers to test it in different store locations.
基于软件的RFID屏蔽在真实时尚零售店中的应用与测试
目的:本文研究了位于意大利北部的两家时尚零售商的基于软件的屏蔽(SBS)的真实性能。设计/方法/方法:本研究基于双案例研究分析。选择了六个不同的因素,每个因素有两个级别。也就是说,我们调查了两个不同的商店;(ii)阅读器型号;(iii)功率水平;(四)分类方法;(v)训练数据集和(vi)参考标签的设置。结果已经在整体和具体的准确性方面进行了评估,并在假前的百分比(即,标签错误地定位在销售面积)。结果:SBS被证明是一种在现实商店正常操作中对标签位置进行分类的良好方法,总体准确率高达0.95。在这两个阅读器中,阅读器A在整体和正面准确性方面都表现出更好的结果,而阅读器B在背面准确性和假正面百分比方面表现更好。在分类方法方面,神经网络与读取器A的reads相结合的分类效果最好。对于训练数据,使用前后读取进行训练的效果大多优于使用单独的前数据进行训练。原创性:我们不知道有任何其他研究在真实商店的正常操作下进行和报告SBS测试的结果。据我们所知,这项研究是第一次报道这样的结果。研究局限:我们研究的主要局限是有限的因素和水平,以及我们使用的特定逻辑回归和神经网络方法。此外,我们在研究中没有考虑标签的配置和密度。实际意义:我们证明SBS是一种可行的选择,可以取代零售商店的物理屏蔽。我们呼吁对这一主题进行进一步的研究,并要求零售商在不同的商店地点进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信