PILOT VERSION OF SCORING SYSTEM FOR LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY OF ABDOMINAL NEUROBLASTOMA IN CHILDREN

Q4 Medicine
D. Akhaladze, G. Rabaev, I. V. Tverdov, N. Merkulov, N. Uskova, S. Talypov, A. A. Krivonosov, N. S. Grachev
{"title":"PILOT VERSION OF SCORING SYSTEM FOR LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY OF ABDOMINAL NEUROBLASTOMA IN CHILDREN","authors":"D. Akhaladze, G. Rabaev, I. V. Tverdov, N. Merkulov, N. Uskova, S. Talypov, A. A. Krivonosov, N. S. Grachev","doi":"10.24110/0031-403x-2023-102-3-17-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to develop a scale for risk, difficulty and complexity assessment of laparoscopic surgical interventions for neurogenic tumors of abdominal localization in children taking into account IDRF, tumor size and other criteria that affect the surgical outcome. Materials and methods used: 124 patients (68 (55%) boys/56 (45%) girls) aged 0 to 18 y/o (median age of 20.5 [5-50.5] months old) who have undergone laparoscopic surgery for neurogenic tumors of abdominal localization in Jan. 2018-Apr. 2022 were included in a single-center retrospective cohort study. An analysis was made of the relationship between the 24 criteria for the complexity of the surgical intervention and the parametric evaluation of its results (duration of surgical intervention; intraoperative blood loss; intraoperative blood transfusion; intraoperative complications and access conversion). As for the quantitative variables, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used, and the eta coefficient for qualitative variables. Cluster analysis was used to distribute points by the difficulty levels. The ROC curve analysis with sensitivity and specificity for high level of complexity was used to check the scale of complexity. Results: median duration of surgical intervention was 105 [75; 150] min, volume of intraoperative blood loss - 5 [5; 20] ml. Blood transfusion was required in 15 (12%) cases, median blood transfusion was 0 [0; 0] ml. Intraoperative complications developed in 4 (3%) cases. Conversions were performed in 4 (3%) patients. 10 complexity criteria were selected: IDRF F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, location of the tumor center, extension beyond the midline, previous open surgery, contact of the tumor with the inferior vena cava, and the tumor volume (ml)/height (m) ratio of > or </= 28. A pilot difficulty scale with three levels of difficulty has been developed. Sensitivity for a high level of complexity (6 or over pts) was 60% (95% CI 23.1-88.2%), specificity was 98.3% (95% CI 94.1-99.5%). Conclusion: different IDRFs contribute differently to the complexity and risk of laparoscopic surgery. The ratio of tumor size to growth is more significant criterion of complexity than the absolute size of the neoplasm. Other criteria of complexity also play an important role, such as previous open surgeries and tumor localization, in particular. The Authors do not recommend this scale for clinical use because the results obtained in this research would form the basis for further prospective study aiming to the development of a more accurate scale of the complexity of laparoscopic operations in neurogenic tumors of the abdominal localization.","PeriodicalId":39654,"journal":{"name":"Pediatriya - Zhurnal im G.N. Speranskogo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatriya - Zhurnal im G.N. Speranskogo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24110/0031-403x-2023-102-3-17-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to develop a scale for risk, difficulty and complexity assessment of laparoscopic surgical interventions for neurogenic tumors of abdominal localization in children taking into account IDRF, tumor size and other criteria that affect the surgical outcome. Materials and methods used: 124 patients (68 (55%) boys/56 (45%) girls) aged 0 to 18 y/o (median age of 20.5 [5-50.5] months old) who have undergone laparoscopic surgery for neurogenic tumors of abdominal localization in Jan. 2018-Apr. 2022 were included in a single-center retrospective cohort study. An analysis was made of the relationship between the 24 criteria for the complexity of the surgical intervention and the parametric evaluation of its results (duration of surgical intervention; intraoperative blood loss; intraoperative blood transfusion; intraoperative complications and access conversion). As for the quantitative variables, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used, and the eta coefficient for qualitative variables. Cluster analysis was used to distribute points by the difficulty levels. The ROC curve analysis with sensitivity and specificity for high level of complexity was used to check the scale of complexity. Results: median duration of surgical intervention was 105 [75; 150] min, volume of intraoperative blood loss - 5 [5; 20] ml. Blood transfusion was required in 15 (12%) cases, median blood transfusion was 0 [0; 0] ml. Intraoperative complications developed in 4 (3%) cases. Conversions were performed in 4 (3%) patients. 10 complexity criteria were selected: IDRF F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, location of the tumor center, extension beyond the midline, previous open surgery, contact of the tumor with the inferior vena cava, and the tumor volume (ml)/height (m) ratio of > or
儿童腹部神经母细胞瘤腹腔镜手术评分系统的试点版本
本研究的目的是考虑IDRF、肿瘤大小等影响手术结果的标准,制定儿童腹部定位神经源性肿瘤腹腔镜手术干预的风险、难度和复杂性评估量表。材料与方法:2018年1月- 4月,124例0 ~ 18岁(中位年龄20.5[5-50.5]个月)行腹腔镜下腹腔定位神经源性肿瘤手术的患者(男孩68例(55%)/女孩56例(45%))。2022例纳入单中心回顾性队列研究。分析了手术干预复杂性的24项标准与手术结果的参数评价(手术干预时间;术中出血量;术中输血;术中并发症和通路转换)。定量变量采用Spearman等级相关系数,定性变量采用eta系数。采用聚类分析方法根据难度等级来分配分数。采用高复杂程度敏感性和特异性的ROC曲线分析来检验复杂程度。结果:手术干预的中位时间为105 [75];150] min,术中出血量- 5 [5];15例(12%)需要输血,输血中位数为0 [0];4例(3%)出现术中并发症。4例(3%)患者进行了转换。选取10个复杂性标准:IDRF F1、F2、F3、F4、F5、肿瘤中心位置、中线外延伸、既往开放手术、肿瘤与下腔静脉接触、肿瘤体积(ml)/高度(m)比>或
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatriya - Zhurnal im G.N. Speranskogo
Pediatriya - Zhurnal im G.N. Speranskogo Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Journal “Pediatria” named after G.N. Speransky (the official short names of the Journal are “Journal «Pediatria»,” “Pediatria,” and “«Pediatria,» the Journal”) is the oldest Soviet-and-Russian (in the Russian Federation, the CIS and former Soviet Union) scientific and practical medical periodical assigned for pediatricians that is published continuously since May, 1922, and distributed worldwide. Our mission statement specifies that we aim to the ‘raising the level of skills and education of pediatricians, organizers of children’s health protection services, medicine scientists, lecturers and students of medical institutes for higher education, universities and colleges worldwide with an emphasis on Russian-speaking audience and specific, topical problems of children’s healthcare in Russia, the CIS, Baltic States and former Soviet Union Countries and their determination with the use of the World’s best practices in pediatrics.’ As part of this objective, the Editorial of the Journal «Pediatria» named after G.N. Speransky itself adopts a neutral position on issues treated within the Journal. The Journal serves to further academic discussions of topics, irrespective of their nature - whether religious, racial-, gender-based, environmental, ethical, political or other potentially or topically contentious subjects. The Journal is registered with the ISSN, - the international identifier for serials and other continuing resources, in the electronic and print world: ISSN 0031-403X (Print), and ISSN 1990-2182 (Online). The Journal was founded by the Academician, Dr. Georgiy Nestorovich SPERANSKY, in May, 1922. Now (since 1973) the Journal bears his honorary name.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信