Identification of facial vessels using Doppler ultrasound prior to cosmetic filler injection

P. Gerber, M. Barsch, T. Filler, A. Gerber
{"title":"Identification of facial vessels using Doppler ultrasound prior to cosmetic filler injection","authors":"P. Gerber, M. Barsch, T. Filler, A. Gerber","doi":"10.1111/ddg.13977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, there has been a continual increase in the number of minimally invasive aesthetic procedures. Even among plastic surgeons, injections with botulinum toxin A and soft-tissue fillers for wrinkle treatment have replaced conventional surgical procedures at the top of the list of the most frequently performed interventions [1]. Given that – unlike botulinum toxin A – said fillers are no prescription drugs but rather medicinal products, they can be purchased relatively easily. Thus, filler treatments are not only performed by physicians but increasingly frequently also by non-medical personnel, such as alternative (non-medical) practitioners or cosmeticians, or even by patients themselves [2, 3]. However, filler injections are not entirely risk free and may be associated with severe adverse effects, especially when done without the proper anatomical knowledge and medical expertise [2, 4–6]. In addition to infections and granulomas, vascular complications are undoubtedly among the more dramatic complications, as they can lead to skin necrosis, scarring and even vision loss [6–9]. Vascular complications are caused either by embolic occlusion due to direct intra-arterial filler injection or by functional arterial obstruction due to the injection of large volumes (of fillers) into the perivascular tissue. Especially critical arteries are those that provide the only – or at least primary – blood supply to certain skin areas. In case of their occlusion, adequate perfusion by collateral vessels is no longer ensured (functional end arteries). Other critical arteries include those from which there are potential anastomoses with the retinal vascular plexus. As a consequence, “risk sites” for filler injection are the areas along the course of the facial/angular artery, the nasal artery and the supratrochlear artery as well as the various temporal artery branches and include the glabella, the under-eye hollows, the nasal bridge and the temples. The vast majority of vascular complications following filler injections have been reported to occur in the aforementioned areas [2, 6–8]. This may be due to the fact that – unlike the depiction in anatomy textbooks – the course of virtually every facial vessel shows great interindividual variability. Consequently, it is not always possible to reliably locate any given facial vessel even if one has appropriate anatomical knowledge. Measures recommended to avoid vascular complications include aspiration and (slow) injection of small Clinical Letter","PeriodicalId":14702,"journal":{"name":"JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.13977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a continual increase in the number of minimally invasive aesthetic procedures. Even among plastic surgeons, injections with botulinum toxin A and soft-tissue fillers for wrinkle treatment have replaced conventional surgical procedures at the top of the list of the most frequently performed interventions [1]. Given that – unlike botulinum toxin A – said fillers are no prescription drugs but rather medicinal products, they can be purchased relatively easily. Thus, filler treatments are not only performed by physicians but increasingly frequently also by non-medical personnel, such as alternative (non-medical) practitioners or cosmeticians, or even by patients themselves [2, 3]. However, filler injections are not entirely risk free and may be associated with severe adverse effects, especially when done without the proper anatomical knowledge and medical expertise [2, 4–6]. In addition to infections and granulomas, vascular complications are undoubtedly among the more dramatic complications, as they can lead to skin necrosis, scarring and even vision loss [6–9]. Vascular complications are caused either by embolic occlusion due to direct intra-arterial filler injection or by functional arterial obstruction due to the injection of large volumes (of fillers) into the perivascular tissue. Especially critical arteries are those that provide the only – or at least primary – blood supply to certain skin areas. In case of their occlusion, adequate perfusion by collateral vessels is no longer ensured (functional end arteries). Other critical arteries include those from which there are potential anastomoses with the retinal vascular plexus. As a consequence, “risk sites” for filler injection are the areas along the course of the facial/angular artery, the nasal artery and the supratrochlear artery as well as the various temporal artery branches and include the glabella, the under-eye hollows, the nasal bridge and the temples. The vast majority of vascular complications following filler injections have been reported to occur in the aforementioned areas [2, 6–8]. This may be due to the fact that – unlike the depiction in anatomy textbooks – the course of virtually every facial vessel shows great interindividual variability. Consequently, it is not always possible to reliably locate any given facial vessel even if one has appropriate anatomical knowledge. Measures recommended to avoid vascular complications include aspiration and (slow) injection of small Clinical Letter
面部血管的多普勒超声识别前美容填料注射
近年来,微创美容手术的数量不断增加。甚至在整形外科医生中,注射肉毒杆菌毒素A和软组织填充物来治疗皱纹已经取代了传统的外科手术,成为最常用的干预措施[1]。与肉毒杆菌毒素A不同,上述填充物不是处方药,而是药品,因此购买起来相对容易。因此,填充物治疗不仅由医生进行,而且越来越频繁地由非医疗人员进行,例如替代(非医疗)从业人员或美容师,甚至由患者自己进行[2,3]。然而,填充物注射并非完全没有风险,可能与严重的不良反应有关,特别是在没有适当的解剖学知识和医学专业知识的情况下[2,4 - 6]。除了感染和肉芽肿外,血管并发症无疑是更为严重的并发症之一,它们可导致皮肤坏死、瘢痕甚至视力丧失[6-9]。血管并发症是由直接在动脉内注射填充物引起的栓塞或由于向血管周围组织注射大量(填充物)引起的功能性动脉阻塞引起的。特别是关键动脉是那些为某些皮肤区域提供唯一或至少是主要血液供应的动脉。在它们闭塞的情况下,侧支血管的充分灌注不再得到保证(功能性末端动脉)。其他关键动脉包括与视网膜血管丛有潜在吻合的动脉。因此,填充物注射的“危险部位”是面部/角动脉、鼻动脉和滑车上动脉以及各种颞动脉分支,包括眉间、眼下凹陷、鼻梁和太阳穴。据报道,填充物注射后的血管并发症绝大多数发生在上述区域[2,6 - 8]。这可能是因为,与解剖学教科书上的描述不同,几乎每条面部血管的轨迹都显示出很大的个体差异。因此,即使具有适当的解剖学知识,也不可能总是可靠地定位任何给定的面部血管。建议采取措施避免血管并发症包括抽吸和(缓慢)注射小临床信
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信