The Importance of Appendectomy in Surgery for Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Ovary.

Mikkel Rosendahl, Laura Amalie Haueberg Oester, Claus Kim Høgdall
{"title":"The Importance of Appendectomy in Surgery for Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Ovary.","authors":"Mikkel Rosendahl, Laura Amalie Haueberg Oester, Claus Kim Høgdall","doi":"10.1097/IGC.0000000000000910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the importance of appendectomy during surgery for mucinous ovarian cancer. It can be difficult to distinguish between primary ovarian and primary appendiceal cancers clinically, histologically, and immunohistochemically. Removal of the appendix may facilitate differential diagnosis, improve staging, and possibly increase 5-year survival but may also be associated with increased postsurgical morbidity. In the largest population published to date, we analyze and discuss these matters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively gathered data on 269 patients with confirmed mucinous ovarian adenocarcinoma from a national database were analyzed. The impact of appendectomy and metastases to the appendix on 5-year and overall survival was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Appendectomy was performed in 172 cases (64%), and in 10 cases (4%), pathologic evaluation of the removed appendix revealed metastases from ovarian cancer. Three of the cases were macroscopically normal, and metastases were discovered only during microscopic evaluation. Patients with metastatic disease to the appendix had significantly worse 5-year survival (22%) compared with patients without metastases (73%) (χ = 31.998, P < 0.0001). Equally, 5-year survival was significantly higher in patients who had been adequately staged with hysterectomy, omentectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and appendectomy (74% vs 52%, χ = 7.322, P = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, increase in revised 2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification stage (IA reference) was significantly associated with worsened prognosis (hazard ratio, 1.13; P < 0.0001). Equally, each stepwise increase in performance status score was related to a poorer prognosis with hazard ratio of 1.63 (P < 0.0001). Metastases to the appendix and staging did not remain significant factors of survival in multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Univariate analysis suggests that metastatic disease to the appendix and failure to perform complete staging including appendectomy are related to a worsened prognosis. A normal-looking appendix does not exclude metastatic disease, and because appendectomy is easily performed and does not increase morbidity, it should be performed during surgery for suspected mucinous ovarian cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":13983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","volume":"35 1","pages":"430-436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the importance of appendectomy during surgery for mucinous ovarian cancer. It can be difficult to distinguish between primary ovarian and primary appendiceal cancers clinically, histologically, and immunohistochemically. Removal of the appendix may facilitate differential diagnosis, improve staging, and possibly increase 5-year survival but may also be associated with increased postsurgical morbidity. In the largest population published to date, we analyze and discuss these matters.

Methods: Prospectively gathered data on 269 patients with confirmed mucinous ovarian adenocarcinoma from a national database were analyzed. The impact of appendectomy and metastases to the appendix on 5-year and overall survival was analyzed.

Results: Appendectomy was performed in 172 cases (64%), and in 10 cases (4%), pathologic evaluation of the removed appendix revealed metastases from ovarian cancer. Three of the cases were macroscopically normal, and metastases were discovered only during microscopic evaluation. Patients with metastatic disease to the appendix had significantly worse 5-year survival (22%) compared with patients without metastases (73%) (χ = 31.998, P < 0.0001). Equally, 5-year survival was significantly higher in patients who had been adequately staged with hysterectomy, omentectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and appendectomy (74% vs 52%, χ = 7.322, P = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, increase in revised 2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification stage (IA reference) was significantly associated with worsened prognosis (hazard ratio, 1.13; P < 0.0001). Equally, each stepwise increase in performance status score was related to a poorer prognosis with hazard ratio of 1.63 (P < 0.0001). Metastases to the appendix and staging did not remain significant factors of survival in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: Univariate analysis suggests that metastatic disease to the appendix and failure to perform complete staging including appendectomy are related to a worsened prognosis. A normal-looking appendix does not exclude metastatic disease, and because appendectomy is easily performed and does not increase morbidity, it should be performed during surgery for suspected mucinous ovarian cancer.

阑尾切除术在卵巢粘液腺癌手术中的重要性。
目的:本研究的目的是评估阑尾切除术在粘液性卵巢癌手术中的重要性。在临床、组织学和免疫组织化学上很难区分原发性卵巢癌和原发性阑尾癌。切除阑尾可能有助于鉴别诊断,改善分期,并可能增加5年生存率,但也可能与术后发病率增加有关。在迄今为止出版的最大的人口中,我们分析和讨论了这些问题。方法:前瞻性收集来自国家数据库的269例确诊卵巢粘液腺癌患者的资料进行分析。分析阑尾切除术和阑尾转移对5年生存率和总生存率的影响。结果:172例(64%)行阑尾切除术,10例(4%)阑尾病理检查发现卵巢癌转移灶。其中3例在宏观上是正常的,只有在显微镜下才发现转移。阑尾转移患者的5年生存率(22%)明显低于无转移患者(73%)(χ = 31.998, P < 0.0001)。同样,接受子宫切除术、大网膜切除术、双侧输卵管-卵巢切除术和阑尾切除术的患者的5年生存率明显更高(74% vs 52%, χ = 7.322, P = 0.007)。在多因素分析中,2013年修订的国际妇产科联合会分类阶段(IA参考)的增加与预后恶化显著相关(风险比,1.13;P < 0.0001)。同样,表现状态评分逐级升高与预后差相关,风险比为1.63 (P < 0.0001)。在多变量分析中,阑尾转移和分期不再是重要的生存因素。结论:单因素分析表明,转移到阑尾的疾病和未进行包括阑尾切除术在内的完整分期与预后恶化有关。外观正常的阑尾不能排除转移性疾病,由于阑尾切除术容易进行且不会增加发病率,因此应在疑似粘液性卵巢癌的手术期间进行阑尾切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书