Particle Size Distributions of Airborne Particulate Matter in a Ferrosilicon Smelter

I. Kero, A. Blom, R. B. Jørgensen
{"title":"Particle Size Distributions of Airborne Particulate Matter in a Ferrosilicon Smelter","authors":"I. Kero, A. Blom, R. B. Jørgensen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3927700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dust and fume emissions are a prominent issue in the ferroalloy industry and relevant to both indoor air quality, occupational exposure and outdoor air quality and other environmental effects. Exposure assessment with respect to respirable particles and “total dust” have been demanded from the authorities for years. Recently the focus has widened and exposure assessment focusing on ultrafine particles is in demand. In this study, ultrafine particles are studied in a ferrosilicon smelter. In order to understand the prevalence of ultrafine particles in the workplace environment, five different locations in the production hall were selected and the number concentration and the particle size distributions were investigated by use of stationary instruments. The worker attendance at each location was logged, so that the exposure at each location could be evaluated in accordance to attendance time. Number concentrations for the time periods where workers were present could be calculated. The locations selected were: tapping area, casting area, ladle transport corridor, control room and electrode-weld-on”. The measurement equipment used was a Nanoscan SMPS from TSI, measuring the particle size range 10-420 nm. The dominating size in the tapping areas is 205.4 nm for both furnaces and one SAF has an additional peak is at 11.5-15.4 nm. In the ladle transport area, the dominating particle sizes are 15.4 nm, 27.4 nm and 154 nm. The casting area has a bimodal size distribution and the two peaks are at 15,4 nm and 154 nm. The electrode welding area is very different from the other areas investigated here. The concentrations are significantly higher and the dominating size is 205.4 nm, but with substantial increased contributions in the range 86-365 nm. This paper discusses the findings and explores possible explanations behind the particle size distributions with support in the literature. Different dust and fume sources present in a smelter are discussed.","PeriodicalId":9858,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering (Engineering) eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering (Engineering) eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3927700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dust and fume emissions are a prominent issue in the ferroalloy industry and relevant to both indoor air quality, occupational exposure and outdoor air quality and other environmental effects. Exposure assessment with respect to respirable particles and “total dust” have been demanded from the authorities for years. Recently the focus has widened and exposure assessment focusing on ultrafine particles is in demand. In this study, ultrafine particles are studied in a ferrosilicon smelter. In order to understand the prevalence of ultrafine particles in the workplace environment, five different locations in the production hall were selected and the number concentration and the particle size distributions were investigated by use of stationary instruments. The worker attendance at each location was logged, so that the exposure at each location could be evaluated in accordance to attendance time. Number concentrations for the time periods where workers were present could be calculated. The locations selected were: tapping area, casting area, ladle transport corridor, control room and electrode-weld-on”. The measurement equipment used was a Nanoscan SMPS from TSI, measuring the particle size range 10-420 nm. The dominating size in the tapping areas is 205.4 nm for both furnaces and one SAF has an additional peak is at 11.5-15.4 nm. In the ladle transport area, the dominating particle sizes are 15.4 nm, 27.4 nm and 154 nm. The casting area has a bimodal size distribution and the two peaks are at 15,4 nm and 154 nm. The electrode welding area is very different from the other areas investigated here. The concentrations are significantly higher and the dominating size is 205.4 nm, but with substantial increased contributions in the range 86-365 nm. This paper discusses the findings and explores possible explanations behind the particle size distributions with support in the literature. Different dust and fume sources present in a smelter are discussed.
硅铁冶炼厂空气悬浮颗粒物的粒径分布
烟尘排放是铁合金工业中的一个突出问题,与室内空气质量、职业暴露和室外空气质量以及其他环境影响有关。多年来,当局一直要求对可吸入颗粒物和“总粉尘”进行暴露评估。近年来,关注范围扩大,需要对超细颗粒物进行暴露评估。在本研究中,超细颗粒的研究在硅铁冶炼。为了了解工作环境中超细颗粒的流行情况,选择生产车间的五个不同位置,使用固定式仪器对超细颗粒的数量浓度和粒径分布进行了调查。每个地点的工人出勤情况都被记录下来,这样就可以根据出勤时间评估每个地点的暴露情况。可以计算出工人所在时间段的数量浓度。选择的地点是:攻丝区、铸造区、钢包运输走廊、控制室和焊点。使用的测量设备是TSI的纳米扫描SMPS,测量粒径范围为10-420 nm。两个炉的攻丝区域的主要尺寸为205.4 nm,其中一个SAF有一个额外的峰值在11.5-15.4 nm。在钢包输运区,主要粒径为15.4 nm、27.4 nm和154 nm。铸造区尺寸呈双峰型分布,两个峰分别位于15nm、4 nm和154 nm处。电极焊接区域与这里研究的其他区域非常不同。浓度显著增加,主导尺寸为205.4 nm,但在86-365 nm范围内的贡献显著增加。本文讨论了这些发现,并在文献的支持下探讨了粒径分布背后的可能解释。讨论了冶炼厂中存在的不同粉尘和烟雾源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信