C-reactive protein Lymphocyte Ratio in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

I. Koc, Y. T. Gullu
{"title":"C-reactive protein Lymphocyte Ratio in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis","authors":"I. Koc, Y. T. Gullu","doi":"10.46310/tjim.1072714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is still a severe problem in underdeveloped and developing countries. Diagnostic tests are unavailable in every health institution, and TB culture can take up to 45 days. Therefore, there is a need for cheaper, faster, and easily accessible diagnostic methods that can guide the diagnosis. This study aimed to determine whether red blood cell distribution width (RDW), C-reactive protein (CRP)-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) can be used as biomarkers in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in patients with no comorbidities. \nMaterial and Methods: Files of microbiologically confirmed 122 patients with pulmonary TB and 153 patients in whom pulmonary TB was excluded were retrospectively reviewed. Out of them, patients with comorbidities were excluded from the study. Eighty-one patients with TB and 100 controls were included in the study. \nResults: The lymphocyte, eosinophil, and LMR levels remained significantly lower in the TB group, while neutrophil, monocyte, RDW, platelet, and PLR levels were higher in the same group. \nConclusion: In those patients suspicious of pulmonary TB, higher levels of RDW, PLR, and CLR, whereas lower levels of eosinophil, PDW, and LMR may predict the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in previously healthy individuals.","PeriodicalId":23372,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46310/tjim.1072714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is still a severe problem in underdeveloped and developing countries. Diagnostic tests are unavailable in every health institution, and TB culture can take up to 45 days. Therefore, there is a need for cheaper, faster, and easily accessible diagnostic methods that can guide the diagnosis. This study aimed to determine whether red blood cell distribution width (RDW), C-reactive protein (CRP)-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) can be used as biomarkers in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in patients with no comorbidities. Material and Methods: Files of microbiologically confirmed 122 patients with pulmonary TB and 153 patients in whom pulmonary TB was excluded were retrospectively reviewed. Out of them, patients with comorbidities were excluded from the study. Eighty-one patients with TB and 100 controls were included in the study. Results: The lymphocyte, eosinophil, and LMR levels remained significantly lower in the TB group, while neutrophil, monocyte, RDW, platelet, and PLR levels were higher in the same group. Conclusion: In those patients suspicious of pulmonary TB, higher levels of RDW, PLR, and CLR, whereas lower levels of eosinophil, PDW, and LMR may predict the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in previously healthy individuals.
c反应蛋白淋巴细胞比值在肺结核诊断中的价值
背景:结核病在不发达国家和发展中国家仍然是一个严重的问题。每个卫生机构都无法提供诊断检测,结核病培养可能需要长达45天的时间。因此,需要更便宜、更快、更容易获得的诊断方法来指导诊断。本研究旨在确定红细胞分布宽度(RDW)、c反应蛋白(CRP)-淋巴细胞比值(CLR)、血小板-淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和淋巴细胞-单核细胞比值(LMR)是否可以作为无合并症患者诊断肺结核的生物标志物。材料与方法:回顾性分析微生物学证实的122例肺结核患者和153例已排除肺结核的患者的资料。其中,有合并症的患者被排除在研究之外。81名结核病患者和100名对照者参与了这项研究。结果:TB组淋巴细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞、LMR水平明显降低,而中性粒细胞、单核细胞、RDW、血小板、PLR水平明显升高。结论:在疑似肺结核患者中,较高水平的RDW、PLR和CLR,而较低水平的嗜酸性粒细胞、PDW和LMR可以预测以前健康个体的肺结核诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信