The Australian Marriage Equality Debate: A Qualitative Analysis of the Self-Reported Lived Experience of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, and Queer (LGBTIQ) People

Q3 Psychology
S. Ecker, S. Rostosky, E. Riggle, E. Riley, Joanne M. Byrnes
{"title":"The Australian Marriage Equality Debate: A Qualitative Analysis of the Self-Reported Lived Experience of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, and Queer (LGBTIQ) People","authors":"S. Ecker, S. Rostosky, E. Riggle, E. Riley, Joanne M. Byrnes","doi":"10.1037/ipp0000116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explored the lived experiences of a sample of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer (LGBTIQ) people during the Australian Government postal survey on legal recognition of same-sex marriage (August to November 2017). Negative impacts of public voting and debates on marriage equality for LGBTIQ people have been previously documented in United States, but less so in other national contexts. Thematic analysis was conducted using written responses of LGBTIQ participants ( N = 5,313) to open-ended questions on a larger survey. Findings revealed that LGBTIQ participants experienced the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey debate as a pervasive and predominantly negative event. Participants reported experiences of prejudice and discrimination and increased fear, anxiety, anger, and depression. They also described the harm and hurt caused by widespread negative images of and messages about LGBTIQ people. Some participants felt their lives were under threat and reported psychological distress, including thoughts of suicide. Although a few participants noted positive support that helped them cope, most participants perceived the debate and vote as a highly stressful, socially fracturing process that threatened interpersonal relationships with family members, workmates, and communities. Many participants described feeling betrayed by the government, country, and Church. These findings extend previous studies that document the public health impacts of political processes that publicly debate the human rights of LGBTIQ individuals.","PeriodicalId":37636,"journal":{"name":"International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This study explored the lived experiences of a sample of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer (LGBTIQ) people during the Australian Government postal survey on legal recognition of same-sex marriage (August to November 2017). Negative impacts of public voting and debates on marriage equality for LGBTIQ people have been previously documented in United States, but less so in other national contexts. Thematic analysis was conducted using written responses of LGBTIQ participants ( N = 5,313) to open-ended questions on a larger survey. Findings revealed that LGBTIQ participants experienced the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey debate as a pervasive and predominantly negative event. Participants reported experiences of prejudice and discrimination and increased fear, anxiety, anger, and depression. They also described the harm and hurt caused by widespread negative images of and messages about LGBTIQ people. Some participants felt their lives were under threat and reported psychological distress, including thoughts of suicide. Although a few participants noted positive support that helped them cope, most participants perceived the debate and vote as a highly stressful, socially fracturing process that threatened interpersonal relationships with family members, workmates, and communities. Many participants described feeling betrayed by the government, country, and Church. These findings extend previous studies that document the public health impacts of political processes that publicly debate the human rights of LGBTIQ individuals.
澳大利亚婚姻平等之争:对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、双性人和酷儿(LGBTIQ)人群自我报告生活经历的定性分析
本研究探讨了2017年8月至11月澳大利亚政府关于同性婚姻法律认可的邮政调查期间,同性恋、双性恋、变性人、双性人和酷儿(LGBTIQ)人群的生活经历。公众投票和辩论对LGBTIQ人群婚姻平等的负面影响之前在美国有过记录,但在其他国家的背景下则较少。主题分析是使用LGBTIQ参与者(N = 5313)对一项大型调查中开放式问题的书面回答进行的。调查结果显示,LGBTIQ参与者将澳大利亚婚姻法邮政调查辩论视为普遍存在且主要是负面事件。参与者报告了偏见和歧视的经历,并增加了恐惧、焦虑、愤怒和抑郁。他们还描述了广泛传播的关于LGBTIQ人群的负面形象和信息所造成的伤害。一些参与者感到他们的生命受到威胁,并报告了心理困扰,包括自杀的想法。尽管少数参与者注意到积极的支持帮助他们应对,但大多数参与者认为辩论和投票是一个高度紧张的、破坏社会关系的过程,威胁到与家庭成员、同事和社区的人际关系。许多参与者描述了被政府、国家和教会背叛的感觉。这些发现扩展了先前的研究,这些研究记录了公开辩论LGBTIQ个人人权的政治进程对公共卫生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation® is committed to publishing research that examines human behavior and experiences around the globe from a psychological perspective. It publishes intervention strategies that use psychological science to improve the lives of people around the world. The journal promotes the use of psychological science that is contextually informed, culturally inclusive, and dedicated to serving the public interest. The world''s problems are imbedded in economic, environmental, political, and social contexts. International Perspectives in Psychology incorporates empirical findings from education, medicine, political science, public health, psychology, sociology, gender and ethnic studies, and related disciplines. The journal addresses international and global issues, including: -inter-group relations -disaster response -societal and national development -environmental conservation -emigration and immigration -education -social and workplace environments -policy and decision making -leadership -health carepoverty and economic justice -the experiences and needs of disadvantaged groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信