Community Collateral Damage: A Question of Priorities

Andrea J. Boyack
{"title":"Community Collateral Damage: A Question of Priorities","authors":"Andrea J. Boyack","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1811067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today’s soaring mortgage default rate and the uncertainty and delay associated with mortgage foreclosure proceedings threatens to cause financial tragedies of the commons in condominiums and homeowner associations across the country. Assessment defaults in privately governed communities result in an inequitable allocation of upkeep costs, and current law provides no way to prevent this spillover effect. But the collateral damages caused by delayed foreclosures and insufficient recoveries can be minimized by gradually increasing the priority position of the association lien. In a majority of states, association liens are completely subordinate to the first mortgage lien. At foreclosure of the mortgage lien, the junior priority assessment lien will be extinguished whether or not there are sufficient proceeds to reimburse for community charges. Assessment delinquencies grow over time, so the longer it takes to complete foreclosure, the greater the costs to the neighborhood. Although several states have adopted a limited lien priority for up to six months’ worth of unpaid assessments, foreclosures today take far longer than six months, and the amount ultimately owed to a community can be significant and far exceed that cap. Federal housing policy impacts the resolution of the issue because the FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac only permit qualifying mortgages to be subject to a six-month assessment lien priority. The decelerating pace of foreclosure further exacerbates the already unjustifiable financial impact borne by non-defaulting neighbors. The lien priority status quo fails to adequately protect communities in today’s context of widespread and delayed foreclosures and under-collateralized mortgage loans. Decreasing the first mortgage lien’s priority during a foreclosure delay would mitigate the harm. Lien priority statutory changes can protect association finances in the future, and such provisions may be applied retroactively as well. In other contexts, states have held that changes to a lien priority regime can apply to existing associations and existing mortgages without unconstitutionally impairing contract or property rights. This is particularly true where the association’s lien is deemed to be created as of the date the organizational documents for the community were recorded (prior in time to any unit’s mortgage). Bank lobbyists have historically opposed any enhanced assessment lien priority, but supporting property upkeep and making assessments more predictable and collectible would actually benefit lenders by shoring up the value of their collateral. Better certainty with respect to homeowner payment obligations will also enable more responsible credit underwriting and contribute to economic recovery. Shoring up assessment lien priority not only ensures a fair allocation of community costs, but also helps to contain the current housing market decline.","PeriodicalId":81898,"journal":{"name":"Loyola University of Chicago law journal. Loyola University Chicago. School of Law","volume":"6 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Loyola University of Chicago law journal. Loyola University Chicago. School of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1811067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Today’s soaring mortgage default rate and the uncertainty and delay associated with mortgage foreclosure proceedings threatens to cause financial tragedies of the commons in condominiums and homeowner associations across the country. Assessment defaults in privately governed communities result in an inequitable allocation of upkeep costs, and current law provides no way to prevent this spillover effect. But the collateral damages caused by delayed foreclosures and insufficient recoveries can be minimized by gradually increasing the priority position of the association lien. In a majority of states, association liens are completely subordinate to the first mortgage lien. At foreclosure of the mortgage lien, the junior priority assessment lien will be extinguished whether or not there are sufficient proceeds to reimburse for community charges. Assessment delinquencies grow over time, so the longer it takes to complete foreclosure, the greater the costs to the neighborhood. Although several states have adopted a limited lien priority for up to six months’ worth of unpaid assessments, foreclosures today take far longer than six months, and the amount ultimately owed to a community can be significant and far exceed that cap. Federal housing policy impacts the resolution of the issue because the FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac only permit qualifying mortgages to be subject to a six-month assessment lien priority. The decelerating pace of foreclosure further exacerbates the already unjustifiable financial impact borne by non-defaulting neighbors. The lien priority status quo fails to adequately protect communities in today’s context of widespread and delayed foreclosures and under-collateralized mortgage loans. Decreasing the first mortgage lien’s priority during a foreclosure delay would mitigate the harm. Lien priority statutory changes can protect association finances in the future, and such provisions may be applied retroactively as well. In other contexts, states have held that changes to a lien priority regime can apply to existing associations and existing mortgages without unconstitutionally impairing contract or property rights. This is particularly true where the association’s lien is deemed to be created as of the date the organizational documents for the community were recorded (prior in time to any unit’s mortgage). Bank lobbyists have historically opposed any enhanced assessment lien priority, but supporting property upkeep and making assessments more predictable and collectible would actually benefit lenders by shoring up the value of their collateral. Better certainty with respect to homeowner payment obligations will also enable more responsible credit underwriting and contribute to economic recovery. Shoring up assessment lien priority not only ensures a fair allocation of community costs, but also helps to contain the current housing market decline.
社区附带损害:优先问题
如今飙升的抵押贷款违约率,以及与抵押贷款止赎程序相关的不确定性和延迟,可能会给全国各地的共管公寓和房主协会带来金融悲剧。在私人管理的社区中,评估违约导致维护成本的分配不公平,而现行法律没有办法防止这种溢出效应。但是,通过逐步提高协会留置权的优先地位,可以将延迟止赎和收回不足所造成的附带损害降到最低。在大多数州,协会留置权完全服从于第一抵押留置权。在取消抵押留置权时,无论是否有足够的收益来偿还社区费用,初级优先评估留置权将被取消。评估拖欠随着时间的推移而增长,因此完成止赎所需的时间越长,社区的成本就越大。虽然有几个州对未支付的评估采取了有限的优先留置权,但目前止赎的时间远远超过6个月,而且最终欠社区的金额可能很大,远远超过了这个上限。联邦住房政策影响了问题的解决,因为联邦住房管理局、房利美和房地美只允许符合条件的抵押贷款享有6个月的评估优先权。止赎速度的放缓进一步加剧了非违约邻国本已不合理的金融影响。留置权优先的现状未能充分保护社区在今天的背景下,广泛和延迟丧失抵押品赎回权和抵押贷款担保不足。在止赎延迟期间降低第一抵押留置权的优先权将减轻损害。留置权的法定变更可以在未来保护协会的财务,并且这些规定也可以追溯适用。在其他情况下,各州认为,对留置权优先制度的改变可以适用于现有的协会和现有的抵押贷款,而不会违宪地损害合同或财产权。如果协会的留置权被认为是在社区组织文件被记录的日期(在任何单位的抵押之前)创建的,则尤其如此。银行游说者历来反对任何提高评估留置权优先权的做法,但支持财产维护和使评估更具可预测性和可收集性,实际上会通过支撑抵押品的价值而使贷款机构受益。更好地确定房主的还款义务,也将使信贷承销更负责任,并有助于经济复苏。加强评估留置权优先权,不但可确保公平分配社区成本,亦有助遏止目前楼市的颓势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书