Effects of Slice Thickness and Pre-Treatment Concentration on the Quality Characteristics of Solar Dried Pineapple

Paddy Ainebyona, Musoke Yekoyada, J. Kigozi, Nabubuya Agnes
{"title":"Effects of Slice Thickness and Pre-Treatment Concentration on the Quality Characteristics of Solar Dried Pineapple","authors":"Paddy Ainebyona, Musoke Yekoyada, J. Kigozi, Nabubuya Agnes","doi":"10.24018/ejfood.2023.5.4.454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overall goal of this study was to determine the quality changes (vitamin C retention, browning, rehydration ratio) that occur during solar drying of pineapple as influenced by different processing conditions (slice thickness and pre-treatment concentration). Pineapple fruits were sliced to varying thicknesses (5 and 10 mm), pre-treated at different concentrations of citric acid (2, 5, and 10 g/l), and dried for 2 days in a Hohenheim model type solar tunnel dryer until a safe moisture level about ≤15% was reached. Samples were analyzed for changes in quality characteristics using standard AOAC methods. Dried pineapple slices were found to differ significantly in terms of browning scores and vitamin C retention (p≤0.05) while no differences were observed in the rehydration ratio (p>0.05). Slice thickness and pre-treatment concentration were observed to have a significant interaction effect on the browning score/index of pineapple slices during drying (p≤0.05). Overall vitamin C concentration increased for samples during the drying process with the maximum vitamin C concentration being 36.85 mg/100 g recorded in 5mm thickness samples pre-treated with 5% citric acid solution. Maximum vitamin C retention was recorded in samples sliced to 5mm thickness and pre-treated with 5 g/l citric acid solution (15.68) while minimum vitamin C retention (2.41) was recorded in 5mm slices treated with a 10 g/l citric acid solution. Rehydration ratio ranged from 1.60 to 2.53. There was no significant difference between the rehydration ratio between the different treatments at P≤0.05. The lowest browning index was observed in samples sliced to 10 mm thickness and treated at 5 g/l while the highest browning index was observed in samples sliced to 5mm and treated at 5 g/l of citric acid. The best-optimized conditions obtained for the given criteria were 5 mm slice thickness and 2 g/l pre-treatment concentration based on a maximum desirability of 0.639. For the optimized combination of drying parameters, the vitamin C content, the rehydration ratio, and the browning were 9.14, 2.43 and 0.47, respectively.","PeriodicalId":11865,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejfood.2023.5.4.454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The overall goal of this study was to determine the quality changes (vitamin C retention, browning, rehydration ratio) that occur during solar drying of pineapple as influenced by different processing conditions (slice thickness and pre-treatment concentration). Pineapple fruits were sliced to varying thicknesses (5 and 10 mm), pre-treated at different concentrations of citric acid (2, 5, and 10 g/l), and dried for 2 days in a Hohenheim model type solar tunnel dryer until a safe moisture level about ≤15% was reached. Samples were analyzed for changes in quality characteristics using standard AOAC methods. Dried pineapple slices were found to differ significantly in terms of browning scores and vitamin C retention (p≤0.05) while no differences were observed in the rehydration ratio (p>0.05). Slice thickness and pre-treatment concentration were observed to have a significant interaction effect on the browning score/index of pineapple slices during drying (p≤0.05). Overall vitamin C concentration increased for samples during the drying process with the maximum vitamin C concentration being 36.85 mg/100 g recorded in 5mm thickness samples pre-treated with 5% citric acid solution. Maximum vitamin C retention was recorded in samples sliced to 5mm thickness and pre-treated with 5 g/l citric acid solution (15.68) while minimum vitamin C retention (2.41) was recorded in 5mm slices treated with a 10 g/l citric acid solution. Rehydration ratio ranged from 1.60 to 2.53. There was no significant difference between the rehydration ratio between the different treatments at P≤0.05. The lowest browning index was observed in samples sliced to 10 mm thickness and treated at 5 g/l while the highest browning index was observed in samples sliced to 5mm and treated at 5 g/l of citric acid. The best-optimized conditions obtained for the given criteria were 5 mm slice thickness and 2 g/l pre-treatment concentration based on a maximum desirability of 0.639. For the optimized combination of drying parameters, the vitamin C content, the rehydration ratio, and the browning were 9.14, 2.43 and 0.47, respectively.
切片厚度和预处理浓度对晒干菠萝品质特性的影响
本研究的总体目标是确定不同加工条件(切片厚度和预处理浓度)对菠萝太阳干燥过程中质量变化(维生素C保留率、褐变率、再水化率)的影响。将菠萝切成不同厚度(5和10 mm),用不同浓度的柠檬酸(2、5和10 g/l)进行预处理,在Hohenheim模型型太阳能隧道干燥机中干燥2天,直到达到安全水分水平≤15%。使用标准AOAC方法分析样品的质量特征变化。干菠萝片在褐变评分和维生素C保留率方面差异显著(p≤0.05),而在复水率方面差异不显著(p>0.05)。切片厚度和预处理浓度对干燥过程中菠萝切片褐变评分/指数有显著交互作用(p≤0.05)。在干燥过程中,样品的总体维生素C浓度增加,在5mm厚度的样品中,用5%柠檬酸溶液预处理的样品中,维生素C浓度最高为36.85 mg/100 g。切片至5mm厚度、用5 g/l柠檬酸溶液预处理的样品中,维生素C保留率最高(15.68),而用10 g/l柠檬酸溶液处理的5mm切片中,维生素C保留率最低(2.41)。复水比为1.60 ~ 2.53。不同处理间补液率差异不显著(P≤0.05)。当柠檬酸浓度为5 g/l时,褐变指数最高的是柠檬酸浓度为5 g/l时,褐变指数最高的是柠檬酸浓度为5 g/l时。在给定标准下,最佳条件为5 mm切片厚度和2 g/l预处理浓度,最大期望值为0.639。经优化后的干燥参数组合,其维生素C含量为9.14,复水率为2.43,褐变率为0.47。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信