Integrated modeling system for evaluating water quality benefits of agricultural watershed management practices: Case study in the Midwest

Elias Getahun, Laura Keefer
{"title":"Integrated modeling system for evaluating water quality benefits of agricultural watershed management practices: Case study in the Midwest","authors":"Elias Getahun,&nbsp;Laura Keefer","doi":"10.1016/j.swaqe.2016.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nonpoint source pollution (NPS) resulting from agricultural production is one of the major causes of impaired natural resources, adversely affecting the provision of ecosystem services. Best management practices (BMPs) are commonly implemented in watersheds to mitigate agricultural NPS. Appropriate selection of BMP type and its placement in agricultural watersheds are crucial for successful mitigation efforts. In this study, an integrated modeling system was developed to identify scenarios of best management practices such as nutrient management, constructed wetlands and filter strips that provide downstream water quality improvements. The modeling system is a coupling of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) for simulating watershed responses and impacts of BMPs, with cost evaluation model solved using Archived Micro-Genetic Algorithm (AMGA2) for generating optimal reduction strategies of NPS pollution at a watershed scale. Its application was demonstrated using tributary watersheds of Lake Decatur – a water supply reservoir located in Illinois, which is listed as impaired for nitrate-nitrogen (N) and total phosphorus (P) in the 2004 Section 303(d) List of Clean Water Act. Study results indicate that nutrient management is the best alternative practice to provide water quality benefits with annual nitrate-N loss reduction of 14.9 percent and cost savings of $6.42<!--> <!-->per<!--> <!-->kg of nitrate-N reduction per hectare (ha). In contrast, constructed wetlands and filter strips were found to incur implementation costs of $10.89/kg<!--> <!-->N/ha and $1.74/kg<!--> <!-->N/ha, respectively, including associated land revenue losses. The effectiveness of the filter strips was very limited because of extensive tile drainage in the study watersheds. The integrated modeling system generates valuable information for developing sound watershed management plan and its framework can be adapted to investigate other environmental challenges detrimental to sustainability of water resources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101194,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 14-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.swaqe.2016.06.002","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212613916300332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Nonpoint source pollution (NPS) resulting from agricultural production is one of the major causes of impaired natural resources, adversely affecting the provision of ecosystem services. Best management practices (BMPs) are commonly implemented in watersheds to mitigate agricultural NPS. Appropriate selection of BMP type and its placement in agricultural watersheds are crucial for successful mitigation efforts. In this study, an integrated modeling system was developed to identify scenarios of best management practices such as nutrient management, constructed wetlands and filter strips that provide downstream water quality improvements. The modeling system is a coupling of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) for simulating watershed responses and impacts of BMPs, with cost evaluation model solved using Archived Micro-Genetic Algorithm (AMGA2) for generating optimal reduction strategies of NPS pollution at a watershed scale. Its application was demonstrated using tributary watersheds of Lake Decatur – a water supply reservoir located in Illinois, which is listed as impaired for nitrate-nitrogen (N) and total phosphorus (P) in the 2004 Section 303(d) List of Clean Water Act. Study results indicate that nutrient management is the best alternative practice to provide water quality benefits with annual nitrate-N loss reduction of 14.9 percent and cost savings of $6.42 per kg of nitrate-N reduction per hectare (ha). In contrast, constructed wetlands and filter strips were found to incur implementation costs of $10.89/kg N/ha and $1.74/kg N/ha, respectively, including associated land revenue losses. The effectiveness of the filter strips was very limited because of extensive tile drainage in the study watersheds. The integrated modeling system generates valuable information for developing sound watershed management plan and its framework can be adapted to investigate other environmental challenges detrimental to sustainability of water resources.

评价农业流域管理实践的水质效益的综合建模系统:中西部的案例研究
农业生产产生的非点源污染是自然资源受损的主要原因之一,对生态系统服务的提供产生不利影响。最佳管理实践(BMPs)通常在流域实施,以减轻农业NPS。适当选择BMP类型及其在农业流域的放置对成功的缓解工作至关重要。在这项研究中,开发了一个集成的建模系统,以确定最佳管理实践的场景,如营养管理、人工湿地和过滤带,以改善下游水质。该建模系统是一个耦合的土壤和水评估工具(SWAT),用于模拟流域对bmp的响应和影响,并使用存档微遗传算法(AMGA2)求解成本评估模型,以生成流域尺度上NPS污染的最优减少策略。它的应用以迪凯特湖的支流流域为例,迪凯特湖是伊利诺斯州的一个供水水库,在2004年《清洁水法》第303(d)条清单中被列为硝酸盐氮(N)和总磷(P)受损。研究结果表明,养分管理是提供水质效益的最佳替代做法,每年可减少14.9%的硝酸盐氮损失,每公顷(ha)每公斤硝酸盐氮减少可节省6.42美元的成本。相比之下,人工湿地和过滤带的实施成本分别为10.89美元/千克氮/公顷和1.74美元/千克氮/公顷,其中包括相关的土地收入损失。由于研究流域广泛的瓦排水,过滤带的有效性非常有限。综合建模系统为制定健全的流域管理计划提供了宝贵的信息,其框架可用于调查对水资源可持续性有害的其他环境挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信