Reliability and validity of a fitness assessment for epidemiological studies.

Abstract

A pilot study was conducted to investigate the applicability of the Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test (CAFT) for use in epidemiological studies. Thirty subjects ranging in age from 18 to 65 were evaluated for cardiorespiratory fitness on four separate visits. Protocols used included maximal treadmill testing, maximal step testing, and the CAFT. Results from these evaluations suggested that (a) habituation to the CAFT was negligible; (b) prediction of VO2max from the CAFT in fit subjects remains a problem and further equation development for this group may be necessary; (c) maximal step-test protocols do not result in unequivocal VO2max determinations and may lead to misclassification of fitness level; and (d) although the CAFT correlates highly to treadmill VO2max (r = 0.90), a relatively large standard error may result in as high as a 13% error in estimating VO2max and may lead to problems in classifying fitness in some populations (e.g., older unfit).