Supplemental Material for Are Societies in Conflict More Susceptible to Believe in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories? A 66 Nation Study

IF 0.9 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Shira Hebel-Sela, A. Stefaniak, D. Vandermeulen, E. Adler, Boaz Hameiri, E. Halperin
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Are Societies in Conflict More Susceptible to Believe in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories? A 66 Nation Study","authors":"Shira Hebel-Sela, A. Stefaniak, D. Vandermeulen, E. Adler, Boaz Hameiri, E. Halperin","doi":"10.1037/pac0000645.supp","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conspiracy theories widely influence our social and political lives. A recent example is the broad impact such theories had on government's efforts to halt the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. In that context, public's compliance and willingness to get vaccinated was found to be substantially and negatively affected by the belief in conspiracy theories, among various factors. In the present study, we tested whether some countries are more susceptible to conspiracy theories than others. We examined, for the first time, the idea that the degree of intensity of conflict predicts the degree of belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories. A multilevel analysis across 66 countries (N = 46,450) demonstrated that people living in countries with higher conflict intensity tended to be more susceptible to COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs. These findings are the first large-scale comparative evidence of the profound psychological effects of conflicts on the involved societies.","PeriodicalId":46820,"journal":{"name":"Peace and Conflict-Journal of Peace Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peace and Conflict-Journal of Peace Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000645.supp","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Conspiracy theories widely influence our social and political lives. A recent example is the broad impact such theories had on government's efforts to halt the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. In that context, public's compliance and willingness to get vaccinated was found to be substantially and negatively affected by the belief in conspiracy theories, among various factors. In the present study, we tested whether some countries are more susceptible to conspiracy theories than others. We examined, for the first time, the idea that the degree of intensity of conflict predicts the degree of belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories. A multilevel analysis across 66 countries (N = 46,450) demonstrated that people living in countries with higher conflict intensity tended to be more susceptible to COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs. These findings are the first large-scale comparative evidence of the profound psychological effects of conflicts on the involved societies.
冲突中的社会更容易相信COVID-19阴谋论吗?66个国家的研究
阴谋论广泛地影响着我们的社会和政治生活。最近的一个例子是,这些理论对政府遏制COVID-19大流行的努力产生了广泛影响。在这种情况下,公众接种疫苗的依从性和意愿被发现受到阴谋论信仰等各种因素的严重负面影响。在本研究中,我们测试了一些国家是否比其他国家更容易受到阴谋论的影响。我们首次研究了冲突的激烈程度可以预测人们对COVID-19阴谋论的相信程度。对66个国家(N = 46,450)的多层次分析表明,生活在冲突强度较高的国家的人们往往更容易受到COVID-19阴谋论的影响。这些发现是冲突对相关社会产生深远心理影响的第一个大规模比较证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: This unique journal is guided by the vision of a world in which peaceful means of resolving conflict prevail over violent ones and in which equity and social justice are hallmarks of all relations--family, community, national, and international. Its scholarly articles cover a wide array of topics, including the diverse causes and consequences of war and other forms of destructive conflict, as well as peace-making and reconciliation, prevention, and sustainable development. Issues about children and family, ethnicity, and feminism have been prominent in articles about both direct and structural violence. The journal publishes a mixture of empirical, theoretical, clinical, and historical work, as well as policy analyses, book reviews, and bibliographic essays.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信