Riding with the Surging Tide: A Review of MCDM's Evolution

Weishu Li, Liying Yu, Wenying Xia, Jian Zhou, YvXiu Zhao, Mei Du
{"title":"Riding with the Surging Tide: A Review of MCDM's Evolution","authors":"Weishu Li, Liying Yu, Wenying Xia, Jian Zhou, YvXiu Zhao, Mei Du","doi":"10.1142/s0219622022300014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is a sub-discipline of operations research aimed at evaluating alternatives in consideration of various criteria. It is used by practically everyone in their daily lives and professional settings. Seeing the great value of MCDM, we conduct a comprehensive review to propel its innovation and development forward. Compared with any other reviews, we do not focus on introducing its methods, but on tracing its evolution and characteristics. As a general rule, every discipline has its own developing laws. They can be understood on various levels and can point out the direction the discipline is heading for. We firmly believe that our work can bring insight into MCDM’s frontiers and trend, which can eventually provide guidance on how to conduct the future research. In the first half of the paper, we investigate MCDM’s paradigm through literature review and colloquially divide its story into four stages: the Stone Age, the Iron Age, the Industrial Age and the New Stage. The first three stages symbolise its debut, growth and prosperity. Each one has distinctive thoughts, techniques and application, and to some extent hints the major works of the next stage. Since the turn of the 21st century, the paradigm has been once again experiencing dramatic changes, suggesting that it is on the threshold of a new era. Thus, in the second half of the work, a bibliometric analysis of the present stage ensues. Put simply, we take a global view of the stage by visualizing the stage’s publication quantity, publication distribution, and research categories. Then we design a snowballing co-citation method to explore its movements. The results demonstrate that MCDM is a dynamic, worldwide study for which China is the most productive country and the USA plays a pivot role in scholar communication. Method reviews, straightforward methods and MCDM-oriented fuzzy sets are predominant frontiers. The application, however, always changes with the requirements of the times. Now, it mainly refers to energy, environment, and supplier selection, while issues like sociology, tourism, education, etc. also emerge at a fast speed. Apart from this, experts have gradually shaken off the fetters of the traditional research style and are increasingly willing to structure methods and select application areas with a more personal touch. In the future, how to improve reviews, methods and fuzzy sets, how to understand and draw inspirations from society needs, and how experts can tailor MCDM to accommodate specific problems might be the pressing concerns.","PeriodicalId":13527,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak.","volume":"54 1","pages":"1087-1122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622022300014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is a sub-discipline of operations research aimed at evaluating alternatives in consideration of various criteria. It is used by practically everyone in their daily lives and professional settings. Seeing the great value of MCDM, we conduct a comprehensive review to propel its innovation and development forward. Compared with any other reviews, we do not focus on introducing its methods, but on tracing its evolution and characteristics. As a general rule, every discipline has its own developing laws. They can be understood on various levels and can point out the direction the discipline is heading for. We firmly believe that our work can bring insight into MCDM’s frontiers and trend, which can eventually provide guidance on how to conduct the future research. In the first half of the paper, we investigate MCDM’s paradigm through literature review and colloquially divide its story into four stages: the Stone Age, the Iron Age, the Industrial Age and the New Stage. The first three stages symbolise its debut, growth and prosperity. Each one has distinctive thoughts, techniques and application, and to some extent hints the major works of the next stage. Since the turn of the 21st century, the paradigm has been once again experiencing dramatic changes, suggesting that it is on the threshold of a new era. Thus, in the second half of the work, a bibliometric analysis of the present stage ensues. Put simply, we take a global view of the stage by visualizing the stage’s publication quantity, publication distribution, and research categories. Then we design a snowballing co-citation method to explore its movements. The results demonstrate that MCDM is a dynamic, worldwide study for which China is the most productive country and the USA plays a pivot role in scholar communication. Method reviews, straightforward methods and MCDM-oriented fuzzy sets are predominant frontiers. The application, however, always changes with the requirements of the times. Now, it mainly refers to energy, environment, and supplier selection, while issues like sociology, tourism, education, etc. also emerge at a fast speed. Apart from this, experts have gradually shaken off the fetters of the traditional research style and are increasingly willing to structure methods and select application areas with a more personal touch. In the future, how to improve reviews, methods and fuzzy sets, how to understand and draw inspirations from society needs, and how experts can tailor MCDM to accommodate specific problems might be the pressing concerns.
随波逐流:MCDM演进述评
多准则决策(MCDM)是运筹学的一个分支学科,目的是在考虑多种准则的情况下对备选方案进行评估。它几乎被每个人在日常生活和专业环境中使用。看到MCDM的巨大价值,我们进行了全面的审查,以推动其创新和发展。与其他文献相比,本文不着重介绍其方法,而是着重追溯其演变和特点。一般说来,每一门学科都有它自己的发展规律。它们可以在不同的层次上被理解,并且可以指出学科前进的方向。我们坚信,我们的工作可以洞察MCDM的前沿和趋势,最终为如何开展未来的研究提供指导。在本文的前半部分,我们通过文献综述来考察MCDM的范式,并将其故事通俗地分为四个阶段:石器时代、铁器时代、工业时代和新阶段。前三个阶段象征着它的首次亮相、成长和繁荣。每一部作品都有其独特的思想、手法和应用,并在一定程度上暗示着下一阶段的主要作品。进入21世纪以来,这一范式再次经历了巨大的变化,表明它正处于一个新时代的门槛上。因此,在工作的后半部分,对当前阶段的文献计量分析随之而来。简而言之,我们通过可视化该阶段的出版物数量,出版物分布和研究类别,对该阶段进行了全局视图。然后,我们设计了滚雪球共被引方法来探索其运动。研究结果表明,MCDM是一个动态的、全球性的研究,其中中国是最具生产力的国家,而美国在学者交流中起着枢纽作用。方法回顾、直接方法和面向mcdm的模糊集是主要的前沿。然而,应用总是随着时代的要求而变化。现在主要是能源、环境、供应商选择等方面的问题,而社会学、旅游、教育等方面的问题也在快速涌现。除此之外,专家们逐渐摆脱了传统研究风格的束缚,越来越愿意以更个性化的方式构建方法和选择应用领域。在未来,如何改进评审、方法和模糊集,如何从社会需求中理解和汲取灵感,专家如何根据具体问题定制MCDM,可能是迫切需要关注的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信