User Experience in Institutional Repositories: A Systematic Literature Review

IF 0.9 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Laura Icela González-Pérez, M. Ramírez-Montoya, F. García-Peñalvo
{"title":"User Experience in Institutional Repositories: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Laura Icela González-Pérez, M. Ramírez-Montoya, F. García-Peñalvo","doi":"10.4018/IJHCITP.2018010105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disruptive ideas and innovative business models take shape from observing and investigating the needs and demands of potential users and measuring their success based on the acceptance by users and their satisfaction. In an educational context, a new mission of the university has emerged, supported by the transfer of open access knowledge through Institutional Repositories (IR); it is important to know the motivations and needs of the academic community to promote scientific dissemination using these platforms. The present article uses the method of systematic literature review: using 29 studies from SCOPUS and WoS, involving the topics User-Centered Design (UCD) and repositories. The results show that two of the three UCD phases—evaluation and requirements—are closely linked and are the reiterative focus of UCD; thus, it is desirable to promote the design of custom-made prototypes according to the users' motivations. It is necessary to redefine methodologies for IR development within open-access ecosystems to guide them towards meeting their potential users' needs and motivations.","PeriodicalId":54025,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals","volume":"60 1","pages":"70-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJHCITP.2018010105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Disruptive ideas and innovative business models take shape from observing and investigating the needs and demands of potential users and measuring their success based on the acceptance by users and their satisfaction. In an educational context, a new mission of the university has emerged, supported by the transfer of open access knowledge through Institutional Repositories (IR); it is important to know the motivations and needs of the academic community to promote scientific dissemination using these platforms. The present article uses the method of systematic literature review: using 29 studies from SCOPUS and WoS, involving the topics User-Centered Design (UCD) and repositories. The results show that two of the three UCD phases—evaluation and requirements—are closely linked and are the reiterative focus of UCD; thus, it is desirable to promote the design of custom-made prototypes according to the users' motivations. It is necessary to redefine methodologies for IR development within open-access ecosystems to guide them towards meeting their potential users' needs and motivations.
机构存储库中的用户体验:系统的文献综述
颠覆性的想法和创新的商业模式形成于观察和调查潜在用户的需求和需求,并基于用户的接受程度和满意度来衡量其成功。在教育方面,大学的新使命已经出现,通过机构知识库(IR)转移开放获取知识;重要的是要了解学术界利用这些平台促进科学传播的动机和需求。本文采用系统文献综述的方法:使用SCOPUS和WoS中的29项研究,涉及以用户为中心的设计(UCD)和存储库主题。结果表明,在UCD的三个阶段中,评价和需求两个阶段是紧密联系的,是UCD反复强调的重点;因此,有必要根据用户的动机推动定制原型的设计。有必要重新定义开放获取生态系统内IR开发的方法,以指导它们满足潜在用户的需求和动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
36.80%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信