Effects of a School-Based Interventional Program on Smoking Refusal Self-efficacy in Adolescent Females

Q3 Medicine
Zienab Rafiee, Abdolghader Assarroudi, M. Zare, H. Miri, Atefeh Behboudifar, F. Nabavi
{"title":"Effects of a School-Based Interventional Program on Smoking Refusal Self-efficacy in Adolescent Females","authors":"Zienab Rafiee, Abdolghader Assarroudi, M. Zare, H. Miri, Atefeh Behboudifar, F. Nabavi","doi":"10.22038/EBCJ.2018.32995.1835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"smoking. Self-efficacy can be assumed as the best predictor of smoking behavior in adolescents. Aim: The present study aimed to investigate the effects of a school-based interventional program on smoking refusal self-efficacy in adolescent females. Method: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 53 adolescent females in 2017. The participants were randomly divided into two groups of intervention (n=27) and control (n=26). The intervention group was provided with a smoking prevention program implemented five sessions a week in their school classrooms. On the other hand, the control group received the routine interventions. A researcher-made Smoking Refusal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire was completed before and one month after the intervention. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS software (version 20.0) using Fisherâ��s exact test, t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: According to the results, 9 (34.6) and 7 (25.9) individuals in the control and intervention groups had smoking fathers, respectively. The two study groups were homogeneous in terms of smoking refusal self-efficacy before the intervention. Following the intervention, the mean self-efficacy scores in the intervention and control groups were estimated as 111.55±13.1 and 93.53±25.02, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding this variable after the intervention (P=0.02). Implications for Practice: The school-based interventional program for smoking prevention in accordance with social skills training could effectively increase the level of smoking refusal self-efficacy in adolescent females.","PeriodicalId":37304,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Care Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":"46-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/EBCJ.2018.32995.1835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

smoking. Self-efficacy can be assumed as the best predictor of smoking behavior in adolescents. Aim: The present study aimed to investigate the effects of a school-based interventional program on smoking refusal self-efficacy in adolescent females. Method: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 53 adolescent females in 2017. The participants were randomly divided into two groups of intervention (n=27) and control (n=26). The intervention group was provided with a smoking prevention program implemented five sessions a week in their school classrooms. On the other hand, the control group received the routine interventions. A researcher-made Smoking Refusal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire was completed before and one month after the intervention. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS software (version 20.0) using Fisher�s exact test, t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: According to the results, 9 (34.6) and 7 (25.9) individuals in the control and intervention groups had smoking fathers, respectively. The two study groups were homogeneous in terms of smoking refusal self-efficacy before the intervention. Following the intervention, the mean self-efficacy scores in the intervention and control groups were estimated as 111.55±13.1 and 93.53±25.02, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding this variable after the intervention (P=0.02). Implications for Practice: The school-based interventional program for smoking prevention in accordance with social skills training could effectively increase the level of smoking refusal self-efficacy in adolescent females.
学校干预对青少年女性拒绝吸烟自我效能感的影响
吸烟。自我效能可以被认为是青少年吸烟行为的最佳预测因子。目的:本研究旨在探讨以学校为基础的干预计划对青少年女性拒绝吸烟自我效能感的影响。方法:选取2017年出生的53名青春期女性进行随机对照试验。参与者随机分为干预组(n=27)和对照组(n=26)。干预组每周在他们的学校教室里进行五次吸烟预防计划。另一方面,对照组接受常规干预。在干预前和干预后1个月分别填写由研究者制作的拒绝吸烟自我效能感问卷。统计学分析采用SPSS软件(20.0版),采用fisher 精确检验、t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验。结果:对照组和干预组分别有9例(34.6)和7例(25.9)父亲吸烟。在干预前,两个研究组在拒绝吸烟的自我效能方面是相同的。干预后,干预组和对照组的平均自我效能评分分别为111.55±13.1和93.53±25.02。干预后两组在该变量上差异有统计学意义(P=0.02)。实践启示:基于社会技能训练的学校预防吸烟干预方案可以有效提高青少年女性拒绝吸烟自我效能感的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence Based Care Journal
Evidence Based Care Journal Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Evidence Based Care Journal (EBCJ) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of patient care. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports patient care in practice. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, EBCJ seeks to enrich insight into clinical needs and the implications for patient care intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on clinical practicality of research findings and strength of study design. EBCJ is essential reading for anyone involved in healthcare professions, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信