ON THE VARIABILITY OF CONVERSION MODELS FOR CONCRETE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT BASED ON PULSE VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS

IF 2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Diaferio
{"title":"ON THE VARIABILITY OF CONVERSION MODELS FOR CONCRETE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT BASED ON PULSE VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS","authors":"M. Diaferio","doi":"10.1115/1.4055979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existence of a wide reinforced concrete building stock, which is reaching the end of its service life, has focused the attention on its vulnerability assessment. The first step of this analysis is the estimation of the concrete compressive strength. In this field, many codes allow to supplement the classical destructive tests with non-destructive ones, because of their versality and of the possibility of reducing the time spent for tests. It is worth noting that the spread of these tests is strictly connected to the accuracy of the conversion models, which correlate the non-destructive measurements to the concrete strength. The present paper deals with this issue by examining the results of the experimental investigations, which made use of destructive and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity tests, on three r.c. buildings in Bari (Italy). The data are analyzed and rearranged to define several testing conditions, for each one of which a conversion model is calibrated. Moreover, the variability of the parameters of the identified models are discussed with respect to the number of data considered in the calibration process, to the chosen model, and to the accuracy of the assessed strength.","PeriodicalId":52294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existence of a wide reinforced concrete building stock, which is reaching the end of its service life, has focused the attention on its vulnerability assessment. The first step of this analysis is the estimation of the concrete compressive strength. In this field, many codes allow to supplement the classical destructive tests with non-destructive ones, because of their versality and of the possibility of reducing the time spent for tests. It is worth noting that the spread of these tests is strictly connected to the accuracy of the conversion models, which correlate the non-destructive measurements to the concrete strength. The present paper deals with this issue by examining the results of the experimental investigations, which made use of destructive and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity tests, on three r.c. buildings in Bari (Italy). The data are analyzed and rearranged to define several testing conditions, for each one of which a conversion model is calibrated. Moreover, the variability of the parameters of the identified models are discussed with respect to the number of data considered in the calibration process, to the chosen model, and to the accuracy of the assessed strength.
基于脉冲速度测量的混凝土强度评估转换模型的可变性研究
宽钢筋混凝土建筑存量的存在,已达到其使用寿命的终点,使人们的注意力集中在其脆弱性评估上。分析的第一步是混凝土抗压强度的估计。在这一领域,许多规范允许用非破坏性测试来补充经典的破坏性测试,因为它们的通用性和减少测试时间的可能性。值得注意的是,这些试验的普及与转换模型的准确性密切相关,转换模型将非破坏性测量与混凝土强度相关联。本文通过对意大利巴里(Bari)三栋钢筋混凝土建筑进行破坏性和超声波脉冲速度测试的实验研究结果进行分析,讨论了这一问题。对数据进行分析和重新排列以定义几个测试条件,并对每个条件的转换模型进行校准。此外,还讨论了所识别模型参数的可变性,涉及校准过程中考虑的数据数量、所选择的模型和评估强度的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信