Bells, Bells, Bells, Bells, Bells, Bells, Bells

IF 0.3 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Jeffrey A. Savoye
{"title":"Bells, Bells, Bells, Bells, Bells, Bells, Bells","authors":"Jeffrey A. Savoye","doi":"10.1111/J.1754-6095.2012.00048.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his definitive edition of Poe’s poetry, Thomas Ollive Mabbott states that Annie Richmond did not have a manuscript of “The Bells.” Listing and describing the various known texts for the poem, Mabbott suggests that “a reference by Phillips, II, 1295, to a manuscript of ‘The Bells’ in Annie’s family . . . probably represents confusion of memory” [CW, 1:431 n. 7]. Mabbott subsequently identifies a manuscript in the Pierpont Morgan Library, previously printed in facsimile by J. H. Ingram, as being the manuscript sold to John Sartain for publication in Sartain’s Union Magazine, where it appeared in the issue for November 1849. (Mabbott labels this manuscript version E of the copy-text.) There are, however, problems with Mabbott’s presumed chain of provenance. To begin with, a fuller examination of the surviving documentation strongly indicates that Mrs. Richmond did indeed own a manuscript of “The Bells.” Ingram wrote to Mrs. Sarah Helen Whitman on 14 February 1877, “I have heard several times lately from Mrs. Richmond . . . & the MS. of ‘The Bells,’ which he [W. F. Gill] announced himself owner of, was only borrowed from Mrs. R.” [see Poe’s Helen Remembers, ed. John Carl Miller (Charlottesville: Univ. Press of Virginia, 1979), 474]. In his first edition of The Life of Edgar Allan Poe, William Fearing Gill presented a facsimile of one manuscript page and asserted, “The original MSS. of ‘The Bells,’ in its enlarged form, from which the draft sent to ‘Sartain’s’ was made, is in our possession at this time” [(New York: D. Appleton, 1877), 207]. Note that Gill describes the manuscript as the one “from which the draft sent to ‘Sartain’s’ was made” rather than the draft itself. Whether Gill intended to imply ownership or merely temporary possession of the manuscript among the materials then being used to prepare his book is a matter of interpretation. Mrs. Richmond explained how Gill came to borrow the manuscript in a letter to Ingram of 31 January 1877: “You have several times mentioned Mr. Gill . . . . At the time he went to Baltimore to attend the Memorial services, he borrowed my manuscript of ‘The Bells,’ which he said he wished to have that he might read the poem with more effect! Since then I have heard (though not from him) that he was preparing a Memoir that would come out this spring—he very likely has a photographic copy of my manuscript, taken while it was in his possession, but I certainly have the","PeriodicalId":40386,"journal":{"name":"Poe Studies-History Theory Interpretation","volume":"13 1","pages":"108 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poe Studies-History Theory Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1754-6095.2012.00048.X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In his definitive edition of Poe’s poetry, Thomas Ollive Mabbott states that Annie Richmond did not have a manuscript of “The Bells.” Listing and describing the various known texts for the poem, Mabbott suggests that “a reference by Phillips, II, 1295, to a manuscript of ‘The Bells’ in Annie’s family . . . probably represents confusion of memory” [CW, 1:431 n. 7]. Mabbott subsequently identifies a manuscript in the Pierpont Morgan Library, previously printed in facsimile by J. H. Ingram, as being the manuscript sold to John Sartain for publication in Sartain’s Union Magazine, where it appeared in the issue for November 1849. (Mabbott labels this manuscript version E of the copy-text.) There are, however, problems with Mabbott’s presumed chain of provenance. To begin with, a fuller examination of the surviving documentation strongly indicates that Mrs. Richmond did indeed own a manuscript of “The Bells.” Ingram wrote to Mrs. Sarah Helen Whitman on 14 February 1877, “I have heard several times lately from Mrs. Richmond . . . & the MS. of ‘The Bells,’ which he [W. F. Gill] announced himself owner of, was only borrowed from Mrs. R.” [see Poe’s Helen Remembers, ed. John Carl Miller (Charlottesville: Univ. Press of Virginia, 1979), 474]. In his first edition of The Life of Edgar Allan Poe, William Fearing Gill presented a facsimile of one manuscript page and asserted, “The original MSS. of ‘The Bells,’ in its enlarged form, from which the draft sent to ‘Sartain’s’ was made, is in our possession at this time” [(New York: D. Appleton, 1877), 207]. Note that Gill describes the manuscript as the one “from which the draft sent to ‘Sartain’s’ was made” rather than the draft itself. Whether Gill intended to imply ownership or merely temporary possession of the manuscript among the materials then being used to prepare his book is a matter of interpretation. Mrs. Richmond explained how Gill came to borrow the manuscript in a letter to Ingram of 31 January 1877: “You have several times mentioned Mr. Gill . . . . At the time he went to Baltimore to attend the Memorial services, he borrowed my manuscript of ‘The Bells,’ which he said he wished to have that he might read the poem with more effect! Since then I have heard (though not from him) that he was preparing a Memoir that would come out this spring—he very likely has a photographic copy of my manuscript, taken while it was in his possession, but I certainly have the
铃声,铃声,铃声,铃声,铃声,铃声,铃声,铃声
托马斯·奥利夫·马伯特在他的坡诗集的最终版本中说,安妮·里士满没有《钟声》的手稿。马伯特列出并描述了这首诗的各种已知文本,他认为“菲利普斯(II, 1295)对安妮家族的《钟声》手稿的参考……可能代表记忆混乱”[CW, 1:41 . 31 n. 7]。mabtt随后在皮尔庞特·摩根图书馆确认了一份手稿,之前由j·h·英格拉姆以传真方式印刷,作为手稿卖给约翰·萨坦发表在萨坦联盟杂志上,它出现在1849年11月的问题上。(可能会将此手稿版本标记为复制文本E。)然而,马伯特假定的来源链存在问题。首先,对现存文件的更全面的检查有力地表明,里士满夫人确实拥有《钟声》的手稿。1877年2月14日,英格拉姆在给莎拉·海伦·惠特曼夫人的信中写道:“最近我多次收到里士满夫人的来信……《钟声》(the Bells)的ms。[见爱伦·坡的《海伦的回忆》,约翰·卡尔·米勒主编(夏洛茨维尔:弗吉尼亚大学出版社,1979年),474页]。在他的第一版《埃德加·爱伦·坡的一生》中,威廉·费宁·吉尔(William feargill)展示了一页手稿的副本,并断言:“原始的国家安全部。《钟声》的放大版,即寄给《萨坦》的草稿,现在仍在我们手中”[(纽约:D. Appleton, 1877), 207]。请注意,吉尔将手稿描述为“寄给‘萨坦’的草稿”,而不是草稿本身。吉尔是想暗示他对手稿的所有权,还是仅仅是暂时拥有这些手稿,然后用来准备他的书,这是一个解释问题。里士满夫人在1877年1月31日给英格拉姆的一封信中解释了吉尔是如何借用手稿的:“你好几次提到吉尔先生. . . .在他去巴尔的摩参加追悼会的时候,他借了我的《钟声》的手稿,他说他想要这本手稿,这样他读这首诗的时候会更有效果!从那以后,我听说(虽然不是他说的)他正在准备一本回忆录,将于今年春天出版——他很可能有我手稿的照片副本,是在他拥有手稿时拍摄的,但我肯定有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书