Long Term Accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 Interferon-γ Release Assay and its Application in Household Investigation

K. Murugesan, P. Jagannathan, J. Altamirano, Y. Maldonado, H. Bonilla, K. Jacobson, J. Parsonnet, J. Andrews, R. Shi, S. Boyd, B. Pinsky, U. Singh, N. Banaei
{"title":"Long Term Accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 Interferon-γ Release Assay and its Application in Household Investigation","authors":"K. Murugesan, P. Jagannathan, J. Altamirano, Y. Maldonado, H. Bonilla, K. Jacobson, J. Parsonnet, J. Andrews, R. Shi, S. Boyd, B. Pinsky, U. Singh, N. Banaei","doi":"10.1101/2021.09.20.21263527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: An immunodiagnostic assay that sensitively detects a cell-mediated immune response to SARS-CoV-2 is needed for epidemiological investigation and for clinical assessment of T cell-mediated immune response to vaccines, particularly in the context of emerging variants that might escape antibody responses. Methods: The performance of a whole blood interferon-gamma (IFN-{gamma}) release assay (IGRA) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells was evaluated in COVID-19 convalescents tested serially up to 10 months post-infection and in healthy blood donors. SARS-CoV-2 IGRA was applied in contacts of households with index cases. Freshly collected blood in the lithium heparin tube was left unstimulated, stimulated with a SARS-CoV-2 peptide pool, and stimulated with mitogen. Results: The overall sensitivity and specificity of IGRA were 84.5% (153/181; 95% confidence interval [CI] 79.0-89.0) and 86.6% (123/142; 95% CI;80.0-91.2), respectively. The sensitivity declined from 100% (16/16; 95% CI 80.6-100) at 0.5-month post-infection to 79.5% (31/39; 95% CI 64.4-89.2) at 10 months post-infection (P<0.01). The IFN-{gamma} response remained relatively robust at 10 months post-infection (3.8 vs. 1.3 IU/mL, respectively). In 14 households, IGRA showed a positivity rate of 100% (12/12) and 65.2% (15/23), and IgG of 50.0% (6/12) and 43.5% (10/23) in index cases and contacts, respectively, exhibiting a difference of +50% (95% CI +25.4-+74.6) and +21.7% (95% CI, +9.23-+42.3), respectively. Either IGRA or IgG was positive in 100% (12/12) of index cases and 73.9% (17/23) of contacts. Conclusions: The SARS-CoV-2 IGRA is a useful clinical diagnostic tool for assessing cell-mediated immune response to SARS-CoV-2.","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.20.21263527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: An immunodiagnostic assay that sensitively detects a cell-mediated immune response to SARS-CoV-2 is needed for epidemiological investigation and for clinical assessment of T cell-mediated immune response to vaccines, particularly in the context of emerging variants that might escape antibody responses. Methods: The performance of a whole blood interferon-gamma (IFN-{gamma}) release assay (IGRA) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells was evaluated in COVID-19 convalescents tested serially up to 10 months post-infection and in healthy blood donors. SARS-CoV-2 IGRA was applied in contacts of households with index cases. Freshly collected blood in the lithium heparin tube was left unstimulated, stimulated with a SARS-CoV-2 peptide pool, and stimulated with mitogen. Results: The overall sensitivity and specificity of IGRA were 84.5% (153/181; 95% confidence interval [CI] 79.0-89.0) and 86.6% (123/142; 95% CI;80.0-91.2), respectively. The sensitivity declined from 100% (16/16; 95% CI 80.6-100) at 0.5-month post-infection to 79.5% (31/39; 95% CI 64.4-89.2) at 10 months post-infection (P<0.01). The IFN-{gamma} response remained relatively robust at 10 months post-infection (3.8 vs. 1.3 IU/mL, respectively). In 14 households, IGRA showed a positivity rate of 100% (12/12) and 65.2% (15/23), and IgG of 50.0% (6/12) and 43.5% (10/23) in index cases and contacts, respectively, exhibiting a difference of +50% (95% CI +25.4-+74.6) and +21.7% (95% CI, +9.23-+42.3), respectively. Either IGRA or IgG was positive in 100% (12/12) of index cases and 73.9% (17/23) of contacts. Conclusions: The SARS-CoV-2 IGRA is a useful clinical diagnostic tool for assessing cell-mediated immune response to SARS-CoV-2.
SARS-CoV-2干扰素γ释放法的长期准确性及其在入户调查中的应用
背景:流行病学调查和T细胞介导的疫苗免疫应答的临床评估需要一种能够敏感检测细胞介导的SARS-CoV-2免疫应答的免疫诊断试验,特别是在可能逃避抗体应答的新变体的背景下。方法:采用全血干扰素- γ (IFN-{γ})释放试验(IGRA)检测SARS-CoV-2抗原特异性CD4和CD8 T细胞,对感染后连续检测10个月的COVID-19恢复期患者和健康献血者进行评价。对有指示病例的家庭接触者应用SARS-CoV-2 IGRA。肝素锂管中新鲜采集的血液不受刺激,用SARS-CoV-2肽池刺激,并用有丝分裂原刺激。结果:IGRA的总体敏感性和特异性为84.5% (153/181;95%置信区间[CI] 79.0-89.0)和86.6% (123/142;95% CI;80.0-91.2)。灵敏度从100% (16/16;感染后0.5个月95% CI为80.6-100)至79.5% (31/39;感染后10个月95% CI 64.4 ~ 89.2) (P<0.01)。在感染后10个月,IFN-{γ}反应仍然相对强劲(分别为3.8和1.3 IU/mL)。14户家庭IGRA阳性率分别为100%(12/12)和65.2% (15/23),IgG阳性率分别为50.0%(6/12)和43.5%(10/23),差异分别为+50% (95% CI +25.4 ~ +74.6)和+21.7% (95% CI +9.23 ~ +42.3)。100%(12/12)的指示病例和73.9%(17/23)的接触者IGRA或IgG阳性。结论:SARS-CoV-2 IGRA是评估细胞介导的SARS-CoV-2免疫应答的有效临床诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信