{"title":"Genotype × environment interaction in rice using measures of stability from AMMI model","authors":"N. Jambhulkar, S. Sahoo, L. K. Bose","doi":"10.35709/ory.2022.59.2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research was conducted to study the stability analysis and comparison between different stability measures from AMMI model in nine rice genotypes. The experiment was conducted in rabi/dry season during 2010-11 in randomized complete block design with three replications at experimental farm of NRRI research station. Eleven stability measures of AMMI model have been used in this study. Spearman's rank correlation was used to measure the relationship between measures of stability from AMMI model. Genotypic and environment effects are significant at 1% whereas their GE interaction is significant at 5%. WITA12 genotype was found to be the most stable while Lalat was found to be the least stable using seven models AMMI Stability Index, AMMI based stability parameter, Sum Across Environments of Absolute Value of GEI Model, Annicchiarico's D Parameter values, Stability Measure based on Fitted AMMI Model, Modified AMMI Stability Index and Absolute Value of the Relative Contribution of IPCs to the Interaction. Annada was most stable and Naveen was least stable using three models Zhang's D Parameter value, Averages of the Squared Eigenvector Values and Simultaneous Selection Index for Yield and Stability. IR64 was the most stable using Sums of the Absolute Value of the IPC Scores Model. Sums of the Absolute Value of the IPC Scores positively and significantly correlated with AMMI Stability Value, Averages of the Squared Eigenvector Values, Modified AMMI Stability Value but not correlated with Sum Across Environments of GEI Model. Modified AMMI Stability Value positive and significantly correlated with Averages of the Squared Eigenvector Values while negatively correlated with Sum Across Environments of GEI Model. Averages of the Squared Eigenvector Values significantly and positively correlated with AMMI Stability Value but negatively correlated with Sum Across Environments of GEI Model.","PeriodicalId":17736,"journal":{"name":"June 1","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"June 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35709/ory.2022.59.2.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present research was conducted to study the stability analysis and comparison between different stability measures from AMMI model in nine rice genotypes. The experiment was conducted in rabi/dry season during 2010-11 in randomized complete block design with three replications at experimental farm of NRRI research station. Eleven stability measures of AMMI model have been used in this study. Spearman's rank correlation was used to measure the relationship between measures of stability from AMMI model. Genotypic and environment effects are significant at 1% whereas their GE interaction is significant at 5%. WITA12 genotype was found to be the most stable while Lalat was found to be the least stable using seven models AMMI Stability Index, AMMI based stability parameter, Sum Across Environments of Absolute Value of GEI Model, Annicchiarico's D Parameter values, Stability Measure based on Fitted AMMI Model, Modified AMMI Stability Index and Absolute Value of the Relative Contribution of IPCs to the Interaction. Annada was most stable and Naveen was least stable using three models Zhang's D Parameter value, Averages of the Squared Eigenvector Values and Simultaneous Selection Index for Yield and Stability. IR64 was the most stable using Sums of the Absolute Value of the IPC Scores Model. Sums of the Absolute Value of the IPC Scores positively and significantly correlated with AMMI Stability Value, Averages of the Squared Eigenvector Values, Modified AMMI Stability Value but not correlated with Sum Across Environments of GEI Model. Modified AMMI Stability Value positive and significantly correlated with Averages of the Squared Eigenvector Values while negatively correlated with Sum Across Environments of GEI Model. Averages of the Squared Eigenvector Values significantly and positively correlated with AMMI Stability Value but negatively correlated with Sum Across Environments of GEI Model.
本研究利用AMMI模型对9个水稻基因型进行了稳定性分析和不同稳定性措施的比较。试验于2010-11年旱季在NRRI研究站实验农场采用随机完全区组设计,共3个重复。本文采用了AMMI模型的11个稳定性测度。采用Spearman秩相关来衡量AMMI模型中稳定性测度之间的关系。基因型和环境效应在1%时显著,而它们的基因互作在5%时显著。采用AMMI稳定性指数、基于AMMI的稳定性参数、GEI模型绝对值跨环境和、Annicchiarico’s D参数值、基于拟合AMMI模型的稳定性测度、修正AMMI稳定性指数和IPCs对相互作用的相对贡献绝对值等7个模型,发现WITA12基因型最稳定,而Lalat基因型最不稳定。采用张氏D参数值、特征向量平方值平均值和产量稳定性同时选择指数3种模型,红豆最稳定,纳文最不稳定。使用IPC评分模型的绝对值总和,IR64是最稳定的。IPC评分绝对值之和与AMMI稳定性值、特征向量平方值平均值、修正AMMI稳定性值呈正相关,但与GEI模型的跨环境和无关。修正AMMI稳定性值与特征向量平方值的平均值正显著相关,与GEI模型的Sum Across Environments负相关。特征向量平方值的平均值与AMMI稳定性值呈显著正相关,与GEI模型的Sum Across Environments呈显著负相关。