Reflections on the Repeal of Roe v. Wade

Q4 Social Sciences

Gender Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.2478/genst-2023-0001

Dana S. Belu

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article examines briefly the implications of the recent repeal of Roe v. Wade by the U.S. Supreme Court. While these implications are dire for women’s rights all over the country, even in those states where abortion is still legal, the repeal may also herald the cancelation of other recently granted rights, such as same sex marriage. Consequently, it is necessary to mount a meaningful resistance to prevent such developments and to find other ways of guaranteeing the right of women to take decisions regarding their own body.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对废除罗伊诉韦德案的思考

摘要本文简要探讨了美国最高法院最近废除罗伊诉韦德案的影响。虽然这些影响对全国各地的妇女权利都是可怕的，即使在那些堕胎仍然合法的州，废除也可能预示着其他最近被授予的权利的取消，比如同性婚姻。因此，有必要进行有意义的抵抗，以防止这种发展，并找到其他方法，保障妇女对自己的身体作出决定的权利。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Gender Studies Social Sciences-Gender Studies

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

157

审稿时长

14 weeks

期刊介绍： Gender Studies is a journal addressing academics and a general readership at the same time and its main goal is to provide a gendered approach to literature, language and society and also to highlight attempts of educationalists and Gender Studies esperts in various parts of the world to institutionalize Gender Studies in the academe. The GS journal publishes high-quality peer-reviewed articles from various Humanities and Social Sciences areas. The GS journal is interdisciplinary—gender proving an excellent analytical category enabling a new perspective on literature, anthropology, social and political studies, cultural studies, linguistics and mass media studies. The GS journal provides state-of-the-art research in all such fields.