Comparison of Three Soft Computing Methods in Estimating Apparent Shear Stress in Compound Channels

Q3 Engineering
Z. S. Khozani, H. Bonakdari, A. Zaji
{"title":"Comparison of Three Soft Computing Methods in Estimating Apparent Shear Stress in Compound Channels","authors":"Z. S. Khozani, H. Bonakdari, A. Zaji","doi":"10.5829/idosi.ije.2016.29.09c.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Apparent shear stress acting on a vertical interface between the main channel and floodplain in a compound channel serves to quantify the momentum transfer between sub sections of this cross section. In this study, three soft computing methods are used to simulate apparent shear stress in prismatic compound channels. The Genetic Algorithm Artificial neural network (GAA), Genetic Programming (GP) and Modified Structure-Multi Layer Perceptron (MS-MLP) are applied to about 100 different data to predict apparent shear stress. The modelling procedure with three models were extended and the best of each model was selected after each step. In modeling with the GAA and GP different input combinations, fitness functions, transfer functions and mathematical functions were investigated for obtaining the optimum combination. The results showed B/b, H/B, nf/nc and h/b as input combination, fitness function MSE and transfer function tan-pur is the best combination for GAA model. The best GP model introduced with B/b, (H-h)/h, nf/nc and h/b as input variables, fitness function MAE and as the mathematical function set. Finally, the most appropriate GAA, GP and MS-MLP models were compared to select the best of them in estimating apparent shear stress in compound channels. According to the results, MS-MLP improved with RMSE of 0.3654 over GAA with RMSE of 0.5326 and the GP method with RMSE of 0.6615.","PeriodicalId":14066,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering - Transactions C: Aspects","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering - Transactions C: Aspects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ije.2016.29.09c.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Apparent shear stress acting on a vertical interface between the main channel and floodplain in a compound channel serves to quantify the momentum transfer between sub sections of this cross section. In this study, three soft computing methods are used to simulate apparent shear stress in prismatic compound channels. The Genetic Algorithm Artificial neural network (GAA), Genetic Programming (GP) and Modified Structure-Multi Layer Perceptron (MS-MLP) are applied to about 100 different data to predict apparent shear stress. The modelling procedure with three models were extended and the best of each model was selected after each step. In modeling with the GAA and GP different input combinations, fitness functions, transfer functions and mathematical functions were investigated for obtaining the optimum combination. The results showed B/b, H/B, nf/nc and h/b as input combination, fitness function MSE and transfer function tan-pur is the best combination for GAA model. The best GP model introduced with B/b, (H-h)/h, nf/nc and h/b as input variables, fitness function MAE and as the mathematical function set. Finally, the most appropriate GAA, GP and MS-MLP models were compared to select the best of them in estimating apparent shear stress in compound channels. According to the results, MS-MLP improved with RMSE of 0.3654 over GAA with RMSE of 0.5326 and the GP method with RMSE of 0.6615.
三种软计算方法估算复合通道视剪应力的比较
在复合河道中,作用于主河道和漫滩之间垂直界面的表观剪应力可用于量化该断面各子断面之间的动量传递。本研究采用三种软计算方法模拟柱状复合通道的视剪应力。采用遗传算法、人工神经网络(GAA)、遗传规划(GP)和改进结构-多层感知器(MS-MLP)对约100个不同的数据进行了视剪应力预测。将三个模型的建模过程进行扩展,并在每个步骤后选择每个模型的最佳模型。在GAA和GP建模中,研究了不同的输入组合、适应度函数、传递函数和数学函数,以获得最优组合。结果表明,B/ B、H/B、nf/nc和H/B作为GAA模型的输入组合,适应度函数MSE和传递函数tan-pur是GAA模型的最佳组合。最佳GP模型以B/ B、(h -h)/h、nf/nc和h/ B为输入变量,适应度函数MAE和为数学函数集。最后,对GAA模型、GP模型和MS-MLP模型进行比较,优选出最适合估算复合通道表观剪应力的模型。结果表明,MS-MLP方法的RMSE为0.3654,优于GAA方法的RMSE为0.5326,优于GP方法的RMSE为0.6615。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信