Time to positivity of blood culture as a prognostic marker in predicting the clinical outcome of blood stream infection

S. Bhat K, Nikitha Jayabalakrishnan
{"title":"Time to positivity of blood culture as a prognostic marker in predicting the clinical outcome of blood stream infection","authors":"S. Bhat K, Nikitha Jayabalakrishnan","doi":"10.18231/j.ijmr.2022.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated blood culture systems provide continuous monitoring of bacterial growth, and time to positivity (TTP), may be used as good tool for diagnosis of blood stream infections. Objective of the study was to document bacterial profile and their susceptibility pattern and to evaluate the association between the TTP and clinical outcome in patients with BSIs. A cross-sectional study was conducted (after obtaining waiver of consent from institute ethics committee), on 75 patients with positive blood culture. Laboratory data such as TTP, bacterial pathogen isolated from positive blood cultures and their susceptibility pattern, clinical parameters such as demographic characteristics, source of BSIs, severity of infection as per various clinical scores were analysed for patients with TTP ≤10 hours and > 10 hours using univariate analysis. was the commonest gram-negative bacterial isolate (33.3%), and Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest gram-positive bacterial isolate (22.2%). Antimicrobial resistance rate in GNB was very high for cefotaxime (57%), ciprofloxacin (44%) and among gram-positive bacterial isolates was high for clindamycin (56.5%), and cefotaxime (50%). In the study, median TTP was 13 hours and short TTP of ≤10h was observed for , and . There were statistically significant differences observed for end stage renal disease, diabetes association and neutropenia patients with short TTP. Time to positivity is a useful tool for to-measure laboratory prognostic factor for patients with bacteremia. However, further studies with larger sample size, may be required to define its usefulness and the optimal cut-off points.","PeriodicalId":13428,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Microbiology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Microbiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmr.2022.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated blood culture systems provide continuous monitoring of bacterial growth, and time to positivity (TTP), may be used as good tool for diagnosis of blood stream infections. Objective of the study was to document bacterial profile and their susceptibility pattern and to evaluate the association between the TTP and clinical outcome in patients with BSIs. A cross-sectional study was conducted (after obtaining waiver of consent from institute ethics committee), on 75 patients with positive blood culture. Laboratory data such as TTP, bacterial pathogen isolated from positive blood cultures and their susceptibility pattern, clinical parameters such as demographic characteristics, source of BSIs, severity of infection as per various clinical scores were analysed for patients with TTP ≤10 hours and > 10 hours using univariate analysis. was the commonest gram-negative bacterial isolate (33.3%), and Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest gram-positive bacterial isolate (22.2%). Antimicrobial resistance rate in GNB was very high for cefotaxime (57%), ciprofloxacin (44%) and among gram-positive bacterial isolates was high for clindamycin (56.5%), and cefotaxime (50%). In the study, median TTP was 13 hours and short TTP of ≤10h was observed for , and . There were statistically significant differences observed for end stage renal disease, diabetes association and neutropenia patients with short TTP. Time to positivity is a useful tool for to-measure laboratory prognostic factor for patients with bacteremia. However, further studies with larger sample size, may be required to define its usefulness and the optimal cut-off points.
血培养阳性时间作为预测血流感染临床结局的预后指标
自动血液培养系统提供细菌生长的连续监测和阳性时间(TTP),可作为血流感染诊断的良好工具。该研究的目的是记录细菌的分布和它们的敏感性模式,并评估细菌性脑损伤患者的TTP和临床结果之间的关系。在获得研究所伦理委员会的放弃同意后,对75例血培养阳性患者进行了横断面研究。对TTP≤10小时和> 10小时患者的TTP、阳性血培养分离的细菌病原体及其易感性模式等实验室数据、人口学特征、bsi来源、感染严重程度等临床参数(按临床评分)进行单变量分析。最常见的革兰氏阴性菌(33.3%),最常见的革兰氏阳性菌为金黄色葡萄球菌(22.2%)。GNB对头孢噻肟(57%)和环丙沙星(44%)的耐药率很高,革兰氏阳性菌对克林霉素(56.5%)和头孢噻肟(50%)的耐药率很高。研究中,TTP中位数为13小时,TTP短时间≤10小时。在终末期肾病、糖尿病和中性粒细胞减少患者中,TTP时间短的差异有统计学意义。阳性时间是衡量菌血症患者实验室预后因素的有用工具。然而,可能需要更大样本量的进一步研究来确定其有用性和最佳分界点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信