Development of the Reporting Essentials for DElirium bioMarker Studies (REDEEMS) guideline

Ingrid Amgarth-Duff, Annmarie Hosie, G. Caplan, M. Agar
{"title":"Development of the Reporting Essentials for DElirium bioMarker Studies (REDEEMS) guideline","authors":"Ingrid Amgarth-Duff, Annmarie Hosie, G. Caplan, M. Agar","doi":"10.56392/001c.36531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Delirium is a serious and distressing neurocognitive condition manifesting as an acute change in mental status due to medical illness, injury and/or treatment. The understanding of delirium pathophysiology is limited and largely hypothetical and this evidence gap impedes the development of effective therapies. Delirium biomarker studies have a key role in building knowledge of the pathophysiology of delirium, subject to the robustness of their methods and reporting. Our objective was to describe the multi-method development and finalisation of a new reporting guideline for delirium fluid biomarker studies: REDEEMS. A previously published systematic review on delirium and advanced cancer biomarkers informed a three-round modified Delphi study with international experts in delirium research in 2019. We held a follow-up consensus meeting with a newly configured expert panel of 12 delirium researchers in June, 2020 to determine the inclusion or exclusion of 16 items that achieved 70-80% (i.e., borderline) consensus in the Delphi study. Of the 16 items presented at the consensus meeting, seven were excluded, six remained as discrete items, and three were merged with another item. The final REDEEMS guideline contained nine items specific to reporting delirium biomarker studies. The REDEEMS guideline was developed through a rigorously conducted Delphi and follow-up consensus meeting with international experts in delirium research. The REDEEMS will support the improved reporting rigour and synthesis of future delirium biomarker research. The next step is dissemination to promote uptake of the guideline and evaluate the influence on improved study methods and capacity to address research hypotheses.","PeriodicalId":72776,"journal":{"name":"Delirium communications","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delirium communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56392/001c.36531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Delirium is a serious and distressing neurocognitive condition manifesting as an acute change in mental status due to medical illness, injury and/or treatment. The understanding of delirium pathophysiology is limited and largely hypothetical and this evidence gap impedes the development of effective therapies. Delirium biomarker studies have a key role in building knowledge of the pathophysiology of delirium, subject to the robustness of their methods and reporting. Our objective was to describe the multi-method development and finalisation of a new reporting guideline for delirium fluid biomarker studies: REDEEMS. A previously published systematic review on delirium and advanced cancer biomarkers informed a three-round modified Delphi study with international experts in delirium research in 2019. We held a follow-up consensus meeting with a newly configured expert panel of 12 delirium researchers in June, 2020 to determine the inclusion or exclusion of 16 items that achieved 70-80% (i.e., borderline) consensus in the Delphi study. Of the 16 items presented at the consensus meeting, seven were excluded, six remained as discrete items, and three were merged with another item. The final REDEEMS guideline contained nine items specific to reporting delirium biomarker studies. The REDEEMS guideline was developed through a rigorously conducted Delphi and follow-up consensus meeting with international experts in delirium research. The REDEEMS will support the improved reporting rigour and synthesis of future delirium biomarker research. The next step is dissemination to promote uptake of the guideline and evaluate the influence on improved study methods and capacity to address research hypotheses.
谵妄生物标志物研究(REDEEMS)指南报告要点的制定
谵妄是一种严重的、令人痛苦的神经认知疾病,表现为由于医学疾病、损伤和/或治疗而导致的精神状态的急性改变。对谵妄病理生理的理解是有限的,很大程度上是假设的,这种证据差距阻碍了有效治疗的发展。谵妄生物标志物研究在建立谵妄病理生理学知识方面起着关键作用,这取决于其方法和报告的稳健性。我们的目的是描述谵妄液体生物标志物研究的多方法发展和最终确定的新报告指南:REDEEMS。此前发表的一项关于谵妄和晚期癌症生物标志物的系统综述为2019年谵妄研究领域的国际专家进行的三轮改良德尔福研究提供了信息。2020年6月,我们与新组建的12名谵妄研究人员专家小组举行了后续共识会议,以确定德尔福研究中达到70-80%(即边缘性)共识的16个项目的纳入或排除。在协商一致会议上提出的16个项目中,有7个被排除,6个保留为独立项目,3个与另一个项目合并。最终的REDEEMS指南包含9个项目,专门报道谵妄生物标志物研究。REDEEMS指南是通过与谵妄研究方面的国际专家进行严格的德尔菲和后续共识会议制定的。REDEEMS将支持未来谵妄生物标志物研究的报告精确性和合成的改进。下一步是传播,以促进指南的吸收,并评估对改进研究方法和处理研究假设的能力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信