Two users

Lon Barfield
{"title":"Two users","authors":"Lon Barfield","doi":"10.1145/506320.506330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are certain things that are difficult to define; freedom , beauty, truth... Well, here's a new one; toast. Toast truly is in the eye of the beholder, ask any couple living together. I like toast to be real toast, Wendelyrme however enjoys slightly warmed bread for breakfast, and accuses me of burning the toast every time I make it. Although not as fundamental an issue as freedom, beauty or truth, I'm fairly confident that more time has been spent discussing (or arguing) about this issue than any of the others. However with the advent of clever technology we can now side-step this and discuss things like freedom, truth and beauty at breakfast over perfect pieces of toast. Much of today's new technology is intimate , it is carried, worn or intended for personal use by one user. Think of mobile-phones, laptops, organizers. MP3 players. However, there is still a lot out there that is less intimate, it just sits around in the kitchen or bedroom until someone, anyone, comes along to use it, and although it is designed for one user, it usually ends up in domestic environ-~\"\" ~ ' ments inhabited by a couple_ This needn't be a problem, unless the technology needs to be used independently by both people at the same time, like the bathroom ('Well what are you doing in there?'), the phone (' Shall I tell you how long you were on for?') or the television ('No I don't want to watch it, it's just monkeys and space and nothing happens in it'). More general problems do arise with technology owned by couples if that technology can be parameterized-which is jargon for setting-up various things before you actually use the technology. Think of setting the dial on the toaster for how well-done the toast will be. ('Hang on honey I'm just parametrizing the toaster'). This is when you realize that you both have different ideas about what it should be set to; that you prefer real toast and your partner doesn't. Or you realize when you share the same push-bike or car how short your partners legs actually are, or that they prefer showers that are scalding hot and leave the shower set on 'scalding hot' when they have finished, that they must have incredible hearing because they only need the TV volume on 2 which makes you think it's bust when you come …","PeriodicalId":7070,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigchi Bulletin","volume":"57 1","pages":"15 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigchi Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/506320.506330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are certain things that are difficult to define; freedom , beauty, truth... Well, here's a new one; toast. Toast truly is in the eye of the beholder, ask any couple living together. I like toast to be real toast, Wendelyrme however enjoys slightly warmed bread for breakfast, and accuses me of burning the toast every time I make it. Although not as fundamental an issue as freedom, beauty or truth, I'm fairly confident that more time has been spent discussing (or arguing) about this issue than any of the others. However with the advent of clever technology we can now side-step this and discuss things like freedom, truth and beauty at breakfast over perfect pieces of toast. Much of today's new technology is intimate , it is carried, worn or intended for personal use by one user. Think of mobile-phones, laptops, organizers. MP3 players. However, there is still a lot out there that is less intimate, it just sits around in the kitchen or bedroom until someone, anyone, comes along to use it, and although it is designed for one user, it usually ends up in domestic environ-~"" ~ ' ments inhabited by a couple_ This needn't be a problem, unless the technology needs to be used independently by both people at the same time, like the bathroom ('Well what are you doing in there?'), the phone (' Shall I tell you how long you were on for?') or the television ('No I don't want to watch it, it's just monkeys and space and nothing happens in it'). More general problems do arise with technology owned by couples if that technology can be parameterized-which is jargon for setting-up various things before you actually use the technology. Think of setting the dial on the toaster for how well-done the toast will be. ('Hang on honey I'm just parametrizing the toaster'). This is when you realize that you both have different ideas about what it should be set to; that you prefer real toast and your partner doesn't. Or you realize when you share the same push-bike or car how short your partners legs actually are, or that they prefer showers that are scalding hot and leave the shower set on 'scalding hot' when they have finished, that they must have incredible hearing because they only need the TV volume on 2 which makes you think it's bust when you come …
两个用户
有些事情是很难定义的;自由、美丽、真理……好吧,这里有一个新的;吐司。烤面包真的是因人而异,随便问一对同居的夫妇就知道了。我喜欢吃真正的吐司,而Wendelyrme喜欢早餐吃稍微热一点的面包,并指责我每次做吐司都把面包烤焦了。虽然这个问题不像自由、美丽或真理那样重要,但我相当确信,人们花在讨论(或争论)这个问题上的时间比其他任何问题都要多。然而,随着智能技术的出现,我们现在可以避开这一点,在早餐吃着完美的烤面包片时讨论自由、真理和美。今天的许多新技术都是私密的,它是由一个用户携带、佩戴或供个人使用的。想想手机、笔记本电脑、记事本。MP3播放器。然而,仍然有很多不太亲密,它坐落在厨房或卧室直到有人,任何人,出现使用它,尽管它是专为一个用户,它通常最终在国内环境——~“~”总共居住着couple_这不必是一个问题,除非该技术需要使用独立的人在同一时间,像浴室(“你在那里干什么?”),电话(“要我告诉你你开了多长时间吗?”)或电视(“不,我不想看,里面只有猴子和空间,什么也没发生”)。如果夫妻拥有的技术可以参数化,那么就会出现更普遍的问题——参数化是指在实际使用技术之前设置各种东西的术语。想想设置烤面包机的刻度盘来决定烤得有多熟。(“等一下,亲爱的,我正在参数化烤面包机”)。这是当你意识到你们对应该设置什么有不同的想法;你喜欢真正的吐司,而你的伴侣不喜欢。或者你意识到,当你们共用一辆自行车或汽车时,你的伴侣的腿实际上是多么的短,或者他们更喜欢热水淋浴,洗完澡后把淋浴器开到“滚烫”,他们一定有惊人的听力,因为他们只需要把电视音量调到2,当你来的时候,你会觉得它坏了……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信