Exploring the Experts' Perspectives on the Most Important Risk Factors of Breast Cancer in Iranian Women: A Qualitative Delphi Consensus

IF 0.3 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
E. Manouchehri, A. Taghipour, T. Najafi, A. Ebadi, F. H. Shandiz, R. L. Roudsari
{"title":"Exploring the Experts' Perspectives on the Most Important Risk Factors of Breast Cancer in Iranian Women: A Qualitative Delphi Consensus","authors":"E. Manouchehri, A. Taghipour, T. Najafi, A. Ebadi, F. H. Shandiz, R. L. Roudsari","doi":"10.2174/1573404820666230815160847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nSeveral methods have been designed to assess the risk of breast cancer. But according to studies conducted in Iran, the risk of Iranian women could not be correctly calculated.\n\n\n\nThis study aimed to explore the experts' perspectives on the most important risk factors of breast cancer in Iranian women.\n\n\n\nIn round one, the risk factors identified from an integrative review of literature and specialist interviews (Delphi round one) were used to design a questionnaire survey. In round two, specialists were asked to rate the importance of each risk factor. In round three, respondents were asked to reprioritize moderate important risk factors. The items considered very important in round three were included in the core risk factors set.\n\n\n\nIn the first round, a total of 119 items were obtained from the results of an integrative review of the literature and interview with experts. In round two, 30 specialists (response rate 50%) prioritized 119 risk factors of BC, and 43 low, 51 medium and 25 high-level risk factors were identified by the experts. From those, 43 low-level risk factors were removed, and 51 medium-level risk factors were carried forward to round three for consensus. No consensus was reached on any of the risk factors that went into round three (response rate 86.7%). Therefore, 25 high-level risk factors were recognized as the most important risk factors for BC in Iran.\n\n\n\nThis study highlights the items that specialists feel would be most crucial to include in the clinical assessment of breast cancer risk. This study has the potential to provide an appropriate and usable tool for detecting high-risk women in primary health care in Iran.\n","PeriodicalId":11030,"journal":{"name":"Current Women s Health Reviews","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Women s Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404820666230815160847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several methods have been designed to assess the risk of breast cancer. But according to studies conducted in Iran, the risk of Iranian women could not be correctly calculated. This study aimed to explore the experts' perspectives on the most important risk factors of breast cancer in Iranian women. In round one, the risk factors identified from an integrative review of literature and specialist interviews (Delphi round one) were used to design a questionnaire survey. In round two, specialists were asked to rate the importance of each risk factor. In round three, respondents were asked to reprioritize moderate important risk factors. The items considered very important in round three were included in the core risk factors set. In the first round, a total of 119 items were obtained from the results of an integrative review of the literature and interview with experts. In round two, 30 specialists (response rate 50%) prioritized 119 risk factors of BC, and 43 low, 51 medium and 25 high-level risk factors were identified by the experts. From those, 43 low-level risk factors were removed, and 51 medium-level risk factors were carried forward to round three for consensus. No consensus was reached on any of the risk factors that went into round three (response rate 86.7%). Therefore, 25 high-level risk factors were recognized as the most important risk factors for BC in Iran. This study highlights the items that specialists feel would be most crucial to include in the clinical assessment of breast cancer risk. This study has the potential to provide an appropriate and usable tool for detecting high-risk women in primary health care in Iran.
探索专家对伊朗妇女乳腺癌最重要危险因素的观点:定性德尔菲共识
已经设计了几种方法来评估患乳腺癌的风险。但根据在伊朗进行的研究,无法正确计算伊朗妇女的风险。本研究旨在探讨专家对伊朗妇女乳腺癌最重要危险因素的看法。在第一轮中,通过文献综合回顾和专家访谈(德尔菲第一轮)确定的风险因素被用于设计问卷调查。在第二轮中,专家们被要求评估每个风险因素的重要性。在第三轮中,受访者被要求重新确定中等重要风险因素的优先级。在第三轮中被认为非常重要的项目被列入核心风险因素集。在第一轮中,从文献综合审查和专家访谈的结果中获得了总共119个项目。在第二轮中,30名专家(应答率50%)对119个BC危险因素进行了优先排序,专家确定了43个低、51个中、25个高危险因素。其中,43个低水平的风险因素被删除,51个中等水平的风险因素被保留到第三轮以达成共识。对于进入第三轮的任何风险因素(有效率为86.7%)均未达成共识。因此,25个高水平危险因素被认为是伊朗BC最重要的危险因素。这项研究强调了专家们认为在乳腺癌风险的临床评估中最重要的项目。这项研究有可能为发现伊朗初级卫生保健中的高危妇女提供适当和可用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Women s Health Reviews
Current Women s Health Reviews OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Current Women"s Health Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on obstetrics and gynecology. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信