Sentiment Analysis for the Brazilian Anesthesiologist Using Multi-Layer Perceptron Classifier and Random Forest Methods

J. Asian, Moneyta Dholah Rosita, T. Mantoro
{"title":"Sentiment Analysis for the Brazilian Anesthesiologist Using Multi-Layer Perceptron Classifier and Random Forest Methods","authors":"J. Asian, Moneyta Dholah Rosita, T. Mantoro","doi":"10.15575/join.v7i1.900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sexual harassment is defined as giving sexual attention both verbally, either in speech or writing, and physically to victims who are predominantly women, On July 13, 2022, there was a tweet featuring a video of sexual harassment that made it trend in various countries. The video irritated Twitter users and made various comments resulting in various sentiments that can be analyzed using sentiment analysis. The purpose of this study is to see what the public thinks about the sexual harassment case of Brazilian anesthesiologist. Besides the sentiment analysis, another aim of this study is to see how objective are those sentiments based on their polarity. This study uses a comparison of two methods in sentiment analysis, namely Multi-Layer Perceptron Classifier and Random Forest, and labeling automatically using TextBlob.  This results in 94.44% accuracy, 94.44% precision, 92% recall and 93% f1_score. For MLP Classifier and accuracy 96.42%, precision 94.44%, recall 96.66% and f1_score 95.56% for Random Forest. Sentiment polarity score from the TextBlob is -0.5 and subjectivity is 0.4 which indicates that most statements are negative and subjective score is 0.4, which means those sentiments are subjective in nature.","PeriodicalId":32019,"journal":{"name":"JOIN Jurnal Online Informatika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOIN Jurnal Online Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15575/join.v7i1.900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Sexual harassment is defined as giving sexual attention both verbally, either in speech or writing, and physically to victims who are predominantly women, On July 13, 2022, there was a tweet featuring a video of sexual harassment that made it trend in various countries. The video irritated Twitter users and made various comments resulting in various sentiments that can be analyzed using sentiment analysis. The purpose of this study is to see what the public thinks about the sexual harassment case of Brazilian anesthesiologist. Besides the sentiment analysis, another aim of this study is to see how objective are those sentiments based on their polarity. This study uses a comparison of two methods in sentiment analysis, namely Multi-Layer Perceptron Classifier and Random Forest, and labeling automatically using TextBlob.  This results in 94.44% accuracy, 94.44% precision, 92% recall and 93% f1_score. For MLP Classifier and accuracy 96.42%, precision 94.44%, recall 96.66% and f1_score 95.56% for Random Forest. Sentiment polarity score from the TextBlob is -0.5 and subjectivity is 0.4 which indicates that most statements are negative and subjective score is 0.4, which means those sentiments are subjective in nature.
基于多层感知器分类器和随机森林方法的巴西麻醉师情感分析
性骚扰被定义为对以女性为主的受害者进行口头或书面和身体上的性关注。2022年7月13日,一条以性骚扰视频为特色的推特在各国流行起来。这段视频激怒了推特用户,引发了各种各样的评论,这些评论可以用情绪分析来分析。本研究的目的是了解公众对巴西麻醉师性骚扰案的看法。除了情绪分析之外,本研究的另一个目的是了解基于极性的这些情绪有多客观。本研究采用了多层感知器分类器和随机森林两种情感分析方法的比较,并使用TextBlob自动标记。准确率为94.44%,精密度为94.44%,召回率为92%,f1_score为93%。MLP分类器的准确率为96.42%,精密度为94.44%,召回率为96.66%,f1_score为95.56%。TextBlob的情绪极性得分为-0.5,主观性得分为0.4,这表明大多数陈述是负面的,主观得分为0.4,这意味着这些情绪本质上是主观的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信