Assessment of Malnutrition in Emergency Laparotomy Patients. A QIP Highlights Simple Measures To Improve Early Recognition and Optimisation of High-Risk Patients.

C. Raslan, F. Tomalieh, O. Lasheen, K. Siddique
{"title":"Assessment of Malnutrition in Emergency Laparotomy Patients. A QIP Highlights Simple Measures To Improve Early Recognition and Optimisation of High-Risk Patients.","authors":"C. Raslan, F. Tomalieh, O. Lasheen, K. Siddique","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-706520/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Aim Early recognition of high-risk malnourished patients is important for optimisation of nutritional status leading to better outcomes. The accurate recording of malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST) results is vital in this regard. This quality improvement project (QIP) aimed to review the quality of nutritional assessment of emergency laparotomy patients against the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines and outline area of improvement.Method The QIP was conducted at Royal Oldham Hospital in 2019-2020 over a seven-month period. Fifty random patients were included in the first audit cycle over a 4-month period, followed by implementation of recommended changes and a re-audit of 30 patients over a 2-month period. The initial MUST scores which were calculated and documented by nursing staff were identified as the nursing staff MUST score (NSMS). To assess the accuracy of NSMS, we developed a MUST rescoring method which was performed by a senior member of the medical team and was identified as the medical team MUST rescore (MTMR). Results The initial audit showed a significant difference between NSMS and MTMR scores. According to MTMR, 23 patients (46%) had an inaccurate MUST score assessment by the nursing staff. A multidisciplinary approach using a standard online calculator were recommended. The second phase of the QIP showed an obvious improvement in the accuracy of MUST assessment. Our interventions improved the accuracy rate of MUST scores significantly (27, 54% vs 29, 96.6%, P = 0.00005).Conclusion A multidisciplinary team approach and online calculator are useful in improving the accuracy of MUST assessment in emergency laparotomy patients. This helped early involvement of the dietitian leading to improvement in morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":15375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical trials","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-706520/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim Early recognition of high-risk malnourished patients is important for optimisation of nutritional status leading to better outcomes. The accurate recording of malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST) results is vital in this regard. This quality improvement project (QIP) aimed to review the quality of nutritional assessment of emergency laparotomy patients against the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines and outline area of improvement.Method The QIP was conducted at Royal Oldham Hospital in 2019-2020 over a seven-month period. Fifty random patients were included in the first audit cycle over a 4-month period, followed by implementation of recommended changes and a re-audit of 30 patients over a 2-month period. The initial MUST scores which were calculated and documented by nursing staff were identified as the nursing staff MUST score (NSMS). To assess the accuracy of NSMS, we developed a MUST rescoring method which was performed by a senior member of the medical team and was identified as the medical team MUST rescore (MTMR). Results The initial audit showed a significant difference between NSMS and MTMR scores. According to MTMR, 23 patients (46%) had an inaccurate MUST score assessment by the nursing staff. A multidisciplinary approach using a standard online calculator were recommended. The second phase of the QIP showed an obvious improvement in the accuracy of MUST assessment. Our interventions improved the accuracy rate of MUST scores significantly (27, 54% vs 29, 96.6%, P = 0.00005).Conclusion A multidisciplinary team approach and online calculator are useful in improving the accuracy of MUST assessment in emergency laparotomy patients. This helped early involvement of the dietitian leading to improvement in morbidity and mortality.
急诊剖腹手术患者营养不良的评估。QIP强调了提高高危患者早期识别和优化的简单措施。
目的早期识别高危营养不良患者对于优化营养状况和获得更好的治疗效果具有重要意义。在这方面,营养不良普遍筛查工具(MUST)结果的准确记录至关重要。本质量改进项目(QIP)旨在对照国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)指南和改进大纲,对急诊剖腹手术患者的营养评估质量进行评价。方法于2019-2020年在英国皇家奥尔德姆医院进行为期7个月的QIP研究。50名随机患者被纳入第一个审计周期,为期4个月,随后实施建议的更改,并在2个月的时间内对30名患者进行重新审计。由护理人员计算并记录的初始MUST评分被确定为护理人员MUST评分(NSMS)。为了评估NSMS的准确性,我们开发了一种MUST评分方法,由医疗团队的一名高级成员执行,并被确定为医疗团队MUST评分(MTMR)。结果初始审计显示NSMS和MTMR评分有显著差异。根据MTMR, 23名患者(46%)的护理人员对MUST评分评估不准确。建议采用多学科方法,使用标准的在线计算器。QIP的第二阶段显示MUST评估的准确性有明显提高。我们的干预措施显著提高了MUST评分的准确率(27.54% vs 29.96.6%, P = 0.00005)。结论采用多学科合作方法和在线计算器可提高急诊剖腹手术患者MUST评估的准确性。这有助于营养师的早期介入,从而改善发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信