Are all politics masculine? Gender socialised personality traits and diversity in political engagement

IF 2 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
H. Coffé, Catherine Bolzendahl
{"title":"Are all politics masculine? Gender socialised personality traits and diversity in political engagement","authors":"H. Coffé, Catherine Bolzendahl","doi":"10.1332/251510820x15991530007006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most research studying gender and political participation fails to problematise the measure of gender identity. Using 2012/13 Dutch Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences panel survey data, we investigate how gender-socialised personality traits relate to various types\n of political engagement. Baseline models show that, when significant, self-assessed socialised agentic/masculine traits are positively, and communal/feminine traits are negatively, related to political engagement, though only to activist types of engagement. Multivariate analyses reveal the\n positive link between agentic/masculine traits and very agentic forms of activity, including engaging with political parties and politicians and going to public hearings. Furthermore, the categorial gender/sex gap in participation matters independently of agentic/masculine traits and communal/feminine\n traits but the direction and size of the gap differs depending on the type of engagement considered.","PeriodicalId":36315,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/251510820x15991530007006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Most research studying gender and political participation fails to problematise the measure of gender identity. Using 2012/13 Dutch Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences panel survey data, we investigate how gender-socialised personality traits relate to various types of political engagement. Baseline models show that, when significant, self-assessed socialised agentic/masculine traits are positively, and communal/feminine traits are negatively, related to political engagement, though only to activist types of engagement. Multivariate analyses reveal the positive link between agentic/masculine traits and very agentic forms of activity, including engaging with political parties and politicians and going to public hearings. Furthermore, the categorial gender/sex gap in participation matters independently of agentic/masculine traits and communal/feminine traits but the direction and size of the gap differs depending on the type of engagement considered.
所有政治都是男性化的吗?性别社会化的人格特征和政治参与的多样性
大多数关于性别和政治参与的研究都没有对性别认同的衡量提出问题。利用2012/13年荷兰社会科学纵向互联网研究小组调查数据,我们调查了性别社会化的人格特征与各种类型的政治参与之间的关系。基线模型显示,当显著时,自我评估的社会化代理/男性特征与政治参与呈正相关,而社区/女性特征与政治参与呈负相关,尽管仅与活动家类型的参与相关。多变量分析显示,能动性/男性化特征与非常能动性的活动形式(包括参与政党和政治家以及参加公开听证会)之间存在积极联系。此外,参与的类别性别/性别差距与代理/男性特征和公共/女性特征无关,但差距的方向和大小取决于所考虑的参与类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Politics and Gender
European Journal of Politics and Gender Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信