Politically Robust Financial Regulation

Itai Agur
{"title":"Politically Robust Financial Regulation","authors":"Itai Agur","doi":"10.5089/9781513566375.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The deferred recognition of COVID-induced losses at banks in many countries has\nreignited the debate on regulatory forbearance. This paper presents a model where the\npublic's own political pressure drives regulatory policy astray, because the public is poorly\ninformed. Using probabilistic game stages, the model parameterizes how time consistent\npolicy is. The interaction between political motivations and time consistency is novel and\ncomplex: increased policy credibility can entice the politically-motivated regulator to act\nin the public's best interest, or instead repel it from doing so. Considering several\nregulatory instruments, the paper probes the nexus of political pressure, perverse bank\nincentives and time inconsistent policy.","PeriodicalId":14326,"journal":{"name":"International Monetary Fund (IMF) Research Paper Series","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Monetary Fund (IMF) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513566375.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The deferred recognition of COVID-induced losses at banks in many countries has reignited the debate on regulatory forbearance. This paper presents a model where the public's own political pressure drives regulatory policy astray, because the public is poorly informed. Using probabilistic game stages, the model parameterizes how time consistent policy is. The interaction between political motivations and time consistency is novel and complex: increased policy credibility can entice the politically-motivated regulator to act in the public's best interest, or instead repel it from doing so. Considering several regulatory instruments, the paper probes the nexus of political pressure, perverse bank incentives and time inconsistent policy.
政治上稳健的金融监管
许多国家的银行推迟确认新冠肺炎造成的损失,重新引发了关于监管宽容的辩论。本文提出了一个模型,其中公众自身的政治压力导致监管政策误入歧途,因为公众信息贫乏。使用概率博弈阶段,该模型参数化了时间一致性策略的程度。政治动机和时间一致性之间的相互作用是新颖而复杂的:政策可信度的提高可以诱使有政治动机的监管机构为公众的最大利益行事,或者相反,阻止它这样做。考虑到几种监管工具,本文探讨了政治压力、不正当银行激励和时间不一致政策之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信