Exploring the Impact of Interlinear vs. L1 Marginal Glosses on Iraqi EFL Learner’s L2 Vocabulary Learning

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Esmaeil Bagheridoust, Hiba Adnan Jawad
{"title":"Exploring the Impact of Interlinear vs. L1 Marginal Glosses on Iraqi EFL Learner’s L2 Vocabulary Learning","authors":"Esmaeil Bagheridoust, Hiba Adnan Jawad","doi":"10.5539/elt.v16n9p13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the impact of interlinear vs. L1 marginal glosses on the Iraqi Learning of vocabulary in EFL instructional setting. Along with all the efforts made during past 3 decades to improve the teaching of vocabulary via various strategies and techniques countywide, the classical grammar-translation method and its offspring are still widely used in most schools in Iraq. By analyzing the elicited data out of the management, treatment, and assessment of 92 pre-university students studying in two high schools in Iraq, the inquirer observed a reliable improvement of vocabulary learning in participants. To examine the effectiveness of the two glossing strategies, i.e., the implantation of L1 marginal and interlinear glosses, the results of pre and post-test of three groups were compared using One-Way ANOVA. We found reliable difference between the two groups in post-test vocabulary learning. Consequently, L1 marginal and Interlinear glosses both have come to make the learners understand L2 texts well, in comparison with the other group. Ultimately, Marginal glossing is more effective than the interlinear (text) glossing in the improvement of vocabulary development of Iraqi EFL learners.","PeriodicalId":30319,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n9p13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of interlinear vs. L1 marginal glosses on the Iraqi Learning of vocabulary in EFL instructional setting. Along with all the efforts made during past 3 decades to improve the teaching of vocabulary via various strategies and techniques countywide, the classical grammar-translation method and its offspring are still widely used in most schools in Iraq. By analyzing the elicited data out of the management, treatment, and assessment of 92 pre-university students studying in two high schools in Iraq, the inquirer observed a reliable improvement of vocabulary learning in participants. To examine the effectiveness of the two glossing strategies, i.e., the implantation of L1 marginal and interlinear glosses, the results of pre and post-test of three groups were compared using One-Way ANOVA. We found reliable difference between the two groups in post-test vocabulary learning. Consequently, L1 marginal and Interlinear glosses both have come to make the learners understand L2 texts well, in comparison with the other group. Ultimately, Marginal glossing is more effective than the interlinear (text) glossing in the improvement of vocabulary development of Iraqi EFL learners.
探讨线间与母语边缘注释对伊拉克英语学习者二语词汇学习的影响
本研究探讨了在英语教学环境下,线间和母语边缘注释对伊拉克人词汇学习的影响。在过去的30年里,在全国范围内通过各种策略和方法来改善词汇教学,经典的语法翻译方法及其后代仍然在伊拉克的大多数学校中广泛使用。通过分析从伊拉克两所高中的92名大学预科学生的管理、治疗和评估中获得的数据,调查者观察到参与者在词汇学习方面有可靠的改善。为了检验L1边缘和行间涂抹两种涂抹策略的有效性,采用单因素方差分析(One-Way ANOVA)对三组的前后检验结果进行比较。我们发现两组在测试后词汇学习方面存在可靠的差异。因此,与另一组相比,L1边缘和行间注释都使学习者更好地理解L2文本。最后,在促进伊拉克英语学习者的词汇发展方面,边际注释比线间(文本)注释更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信