Efficacy of different chelating agents in smear layer removal

Ahmed Elsamra, A. Darrag, W. Ghoneim
{"title":"Efficacy of different chelating agents in smear layer removal","authors":"Ahmed Elsamra, A. Darrag, W. Ghoneim","doi":"10.4103/tdj.tdj_52_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim The aim of this study was to assess the ability of 17% EDTA, 10% citric acid, 2.25% peracetic acid and 1% phytic acid (IP6) in removing smear layer from root canal system of human teeth using scanning electron microscopic analysis. Materials and methods Forty freshly extracted single canal human mandibular premolars with nearly straight mature fully developed roots were used in this study. Teeth were decoronated perpendicular to their long axises leaving roots ∼ 13 ± 1 mm. Chemomechanical preparation was done using ProTaper instrument in a crown down technique up to F4 master apical file (40/0.06) with irrigation of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite throughout instrumentation. Depending on the used final irrigation solution, the samples were divided randomly into four experimental groups (n = 10). Group I: 17% EDTA. Group II: 10% citric acid. Group III: 2.25% peracetic acid. Group IV: 1% phytic acid. The experimental time periods were 1 min. These samples were prepared and then observed by using scanning electron microscopic analysis for the absence or presence of smear layer, there by analyzing their cleaning effectiveness in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the root canal system. Results In intergroup comparison, there was no statistically significant difference among the four groups. In intragroup comparison, there was no statistically significant difference between coronal and middle thirds. However, there were statistically significant differences between apical third versus both coronal and middle thirds in all tested groups. Conclusions The four tested final irrigation solutions can effectively remove the smear layer from the coronal and middle root canal thirds, but they did not completely remove the smear layer at the apical one third.","PeriodicalId":22324,"journal":{"name":"Tanta Dental Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"27 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanta Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_52_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim The aim of this study was to assess the ability of 17% EDTA, 10% citric acid, 2.25% peracetic acid and 1% phytic acid (IP6) in removing smear layer from root canal system of human teeth using scanning electron microscopic analysis. Materials and methods Forty freshly extracted single canal human mandibular premolars with nearly straight mature fully developed roots were used in this study. Teeth were decoronated perpendicular to their long axises leaving roots ∼ 13 ± 1 mm. Chemomechanical preparation was done using ProTaper instrument in a crown down technique up to F4 master apical file (40/0.06) with irrigation of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite throughout instrumentation. Depending on the used final irrigation solution, the samples were divided randomly into four experimental groups (n = 10). Group I: 17% EDTA. Group II: 10% citric acid. Group III: 2.25% peracetic acid. Group IV: 1% phytic acid. The experimental time periods were 1 min. These samples were prepared and then observed by using scanning electron microscopic analysis for the absence or presence of smear layer, there by analyzing their cleaning effectiveness in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the root canal system. Results In intergroup comparison, there was no statistically significant difference among the four groups. In intragroup comparison, there was no statistically significant difference between coronal and middle thirds. However, there were statistically significant differences between apical third versus both coronal and middle thirds in all tested groups. Conclusions The four tested final irrigation solutions can effectively remove the smear layer from the coronal and middle root canal thirds, but they did not completely remove the smear layer at the apical one third.
不同螯合剂去除涂抹层的效果
目的应用扫描电镜分析17% EDTA、10%柠檬酸、2.25%过氧乙酸和1%植酸(IP6)对人牙根管系统涂抹层的去除效果。材料与方法采用40颗新鲜拔牙的下颌前磨牙,牙根近直、成熟、发育完全。牙齿装饰垂直于其长轴,离根约13±1毫米。使用ProTaper仪器进行化学机械准备,在冠降技术下达到F4主根尖锉(40/0.06),整个过程中冲洗2.5%次氯酸钠。根据最终使用的灌洗液,将样品随机分为4个实验组(n = 10)。第一组:17% EDTA。第二组:10%柠檬酸。第三组:2.25%过氧乙酸。IV组:1%植酸。实验时间为1 min。制备这些样品,然后通过扫描电镜分析观察有无涂抹层,并分析其在根管系统冠状、中间和根尖三分之一处的清洁效果。结果组间比较,四组间差异无统计学意义。在组内比较中,冠状区与中三分之一组间差异无统计学意义。然而,在所有测试组中,根尖三分之一与冠状和中三分之一之间存在统计学差异。结论4种最终灌洗液均能有效清除冠状根管和中根管三分之一的涂片层,但不能完全清除根尖三分之一的涂片层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信