Comparison between subjective and colorimetric probe technique in grading interdental embrasure spaces in esthetic zone

Vishal Alampur, J. Gooty, V. Guntakandla, Palaparthi Rajababu
{"title":"Comparison between subjective and colorimetric probe technique in grading interdental embrasure spaces in esthetic zone","authors":"Vishal Alampur, J. Gooty, V. Guntakandla, Palaparthi Rajababu","doi":"10.4103/jid.jid_42_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: An effective nonsurgical and surgical periodontal treatment cannot be accomplished by brushing alone as it does not detach the plaque interdentally. Interdental cleaning aids can remove this interdental plaque. This optimizes the plaque control. Selecting the right size of interdental brush fills the entire interdental space thereby cleaning all the areas of the embrasure. Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the grading of gingival embrasure by periodontists with subjective technique and calibrated interdental probe. Subjects and Methods: Ten healthy patients were selected for the study. Gingival embrasures of patients were assessed with discretion by six periodontists. Later, every periodontist was educated about the use of calibrated probes. After a specific time-lapse, all the periodontists have examined the same patients again with the calibrated interdental probe. The embrasures in the patients were examined from left to right in maxillary and mandibular single-rooted and bicuspid teeth. Statistical Analysis: The assessment of scores between calibrated and arbitrary techniques by a single doctor for each gingival embrasure in all the patients was calculated by the Wilcoxon matched pair test. Comparison between doctors with the mean error was calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA. Results: Significant results were observed in grading gingival embrasures by individual periodontists for every tooth between calibrated and arbitrary techniques. Conclusions: Based on morphology and location of teeth the gingival embrasure space differs. Choosing an interdental aid subjectively, probably will not give an appropriate cleaning viability. To accomplish a legitimate cleaning viability, an appropriate size interdental brush ought to be chosen for a specific embrasure. Utilizing a calibrated interdental probe helps the clinician choose an appropriate interdental brush for a specific embrasure space.","PeriodicalId":14017,"journal":{"name":"International journal of interdisciplinary dentistry","volume":"71 1","pages":"2 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of interdisciplinary dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jid.jid_42_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An effective nonsurgical and surgical periodontal treatment cannot be accomplished by brushing alone as it does not detach the plaque interdentally. Interdental cleaning aids can remove this interdental plaque. This optimizes the plaque control. Selecting the right size of interdental brush fills the entire interdental space thereby cleaning all the areas of the embrasure. Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the grading of gingival embrasure by periodontists with subjective technique and calibrated interdental probe. Subjects and Methods: Ten healthy patients were selected for the study. Gingival embrasures of patients were assessed with discretion by six periodontists. Later, every periodontist was educated about the use of calibrated probes. After a specific time-lapse, all the periodontists have examined the same patients again with the calibrated interdental probe. The embrasures in the patients were examined from left to right in maxillary and mandibular single-rooted and bicuspid teeth. Statistical Analysis: The assessment of scores between calibrated and arbitrary techniques by a single doctor for each gingival embrasure in all the patients was calculated by the Wilcoxon matched pair test. Comparison between doctors with the mean error was calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA. Results: Significant results were observed in grading gingival embrasures by individual periodontists for every tooth between calibrated and arbitrary techniques. Conclusions: Based on morphology and location of teeth the gingival embrasure space differs. Choosing an interdental aid subjectively, probably will not give an appropriate cleaning viability. To accomplish a legitimate cleaning viability, an appropriate size interdental brush ought to be chosen for a specific embrasure. Utilizing a calibrated interdental probe helps the clinician choose an appropriate interdental brush for a specific embrasure space.
主观探针技术与比色探针技术在审美区牙间隙分级中的比较
背景:有效的非手术和手术牙周治疗不能仅仅通过刷牙来完成,因为它不能在内部分离牙菌斑。牙间清洁辅助工具可以清除牙间菌斑。这优化了斑块的控制。选择合适尺寸的齿间刷填充整个齿间空间,从而清洁牙胚的所有区域。目的:本研究的目的是评估牙周病医生用主观技术和校准的牙间探针对牙龈膜的分级。对象与方法:选择10例健康患者作为研究对象。6名牙周病医生对患者的牙龈囊膜进行了评估。后来,每个牙周病医生都接受了使用校准探针的教育。经过一段特定的时间后,所有牙周病医生再次用校准过的牙间探针检查同一患者。从左至右依次检查上颌单根牙和双尖牙胚膜。统计分析:通过Wilcoxon配对对检验,对所有患者的每一个牙龈囊膜由一名医生对校准技术和任意技术的评分进行评估。通过Kruskal-Wallis方差分析计算医生之间的比较和平均误差。结果:在校准技术和任意技术之间,个体牙周病医生对每颗牙齿的牙龈膜进行分级观察到显著的结果。结论:龈膜间隙因牙的形态和位置不同而不同。主观地选择牙间辅助工具,可能不会给出适当的清洁可行性。为了实现合理的清洁能力,应该为特定的牙膜选择合适尺寸的牙间刷。利用校准的牙间探针可以帮助临床医生为特定的牙胚空间选择合适的牙间刷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书