Before They Crash and Burn (Out): A Compassion Fatigue Resilience Model

Kerry A. Schwanz, Melissa L. Paiva-Salisbury
{"title":"Before They Crash and Burn (Out): A Compassion Fatigue Resilience Model","authors":"Kerry A. Schwanz, Melissa L. Paiva-Salisbury","doi":"10.55504/2578-9333.1100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We propose a working model of compassion fatigue resilience by identifying compassion fatigue (CF) and compassion satisfaction correlates as potential targets for building resilience. Further, we explore focusing on pre-professionals as a method of primary prevention of CF. Methods: The participants were 143 college students who completed self-report measures to assess current CF, self-care behaviors, self-care beliefs, self-esteem, frequency of helping behaviors, and exposure to others under extreme stress. Results: Notably, hierarchical regression analyses (controlling for helping frequency and exposure to high stress individuals) suggested that self-care beliefs and self-care behaviors contributed to concurrent experiences of CF, through secondary traumatic stress (R2 =.3, F(5,135) = 11.69, p <.001) and burnout (R2 =.4, F(5,135) = 18.08, p <.001), respectively. Self-care behaviors were associated with compassion satisfaction in our regression model, which explained 36.1% of the variance in compassion satisfaction (R2 =.36, F(5,135) = 15.24, p <.001). Conclusion: Remarkably, we found self-care beliefs as a significant predictor of concurrent CF. In line with prior research on professionals, we found compassion satisfaction to have an inverse relationship with burnout, and found self-care behaviors to predict concurrent compassion satisfaction. Based on our findings, a working model to build resilience to compassion fatigue is proposed (which centers on the importance of both self-care beliefs and self-care behaviors). Resilience promotion should focus on educating individuals about the risks of secondary traumatic stress and burnout prior to starting a career in the helping professions, before patterns of self-care beliefs and behaviors are firmly established. ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":90738,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of health, wellness & society","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of health, wellness & society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55504/2578-9333.1100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: We propose a working model of compassion fatigue resilience by identifying compassion fatigue (CF) and compassion satisfaction correlates as potential targets for building resilience. Further, we explore focusing on pre-professionals as a method of primary prevention of CF. Methods: The participants were 143 college students who completed self-report measures to assess current CF, self-care behaviors, self-care beliefs, self-esteem, frequency of helping behaviors, and exposure to others under extreme stress. Results: Notably, hierarchical regression analyses (controlling for helping frequency and exposure to high stress individuals) suggested that self-care beliefs and self-care behaviors contributed to concurrent experiences of CF, through secondary traumatic stress (R2 =.3, F(5,135) = 11.69, p <.001) and burnout (R2 =.4, F(5,135) = 18.08, p <.001), respectively. Self-care behaviors were associated with compassion satisfaction in our regression model, which explained 36.1% of the variance in compassion satisfaction (R2 =.36, F(5,135) = 15.24, p <.001). Conclusion: Remarkably, we found self-care beliefs as a significant predictor of concurrent CF. In line with prior research on professionals, we found compassion satisfaction to have an inverse relationship with burnout, and found self-care behaviors to predict concurrent compassion satisfaction. Based on our findings, a working model to build resilience to compassion fatigue is proposed (which centers on the importance of both self-care beliefs and self-care behaviors). Resilience promotion should focus on educating individuals about the risks of secondary traumatic stress and burnout prior to starting a career in the helping professions, before patterns of self-care beliefs and behaviors are firmly established. ABSTRACT
在他们崩溃和耗尽之前:一个同情疲劳恢复模型
前言:本文提出了一个同情疲劳弹性的工作模型,将同情疲劳(CF)和同情满意度作为构建弹性的潜在目标。方法:以143名大学生为研究对象,通过自我报告量表评估其CF现状、自我照顾行为、自我照顾信念、自尊、帮助行为频率和极端压力下的他人暴露。结果:值得注意的是,层次回归分析(控制帮助频率和暴露于高压力个体)表明,自我保健信念和自我保健行为通过继发性创伤应激对CF并发体验有贡献(R2 =。3, F(5135) = 11.69, p <.001)和倦怠(R2 =。4, F(5135) = 18.08, p < 0.001)。在我们的回归模型中,自我照顾行为与同情满意度相关,解释了36.1%的同情满意度方差(R2 =。36, F(5135) = 15.24, p < 0.001)。结论:我们发现自我照顾信念是并发性CF的显著预测因子。与先前对专业人员的研究一致,我们发现同情满意度与倦怠呈负相关,自我照顾行为预测并发性同情满意度。在此基础上,本文提出了一个建立同情疲劳弹性的工作模型(该模型以自我照顾信念和自我照顾行为的重要性为中心)。在开始从事助人职业之前,在自我照顾的信念和行为模式牢固建立之前,恢复力的提升应该侧重于教育个人关于继发性创伤压力和倦怠的风险。摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书