Epithelial ovarian cancer and induction of ovulation

Emma J. Crosbie , Usha Menon
{"title":"Epithelial ovarian cancer and induction of ovulation","authors":"Emma J. Crosbie ,&nbsp;Usha Menon","doi":"10.1016/j.rigp.2005.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The possible link between ovulation-inducing agents and ovarian cancer has been the focus of considerable research effort over the past decade. Epidemiological studies addressing this issue have varied in their ability to achieve adequate sample sizes, obtain accurate measures of subfertility and fertility drug use, and eliminate potential bias due to confounding variables. Despite these methodological challenges, nulliparity has consistently been associated with increased rates of epithelial ovarian cancer. An additional modest effect of subfertility has been suggested by some studies, particularly among women who remain childless despite prolonged non-pharmacological attempts to conceive. Type of subfertility may also impact on ovarian cancer risk: ovulatory disorders, endometriosis and unexplained subfertility have all been associated with increased rates of the disease. However, most studies have shown no overall increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women exposed to ovulation-inducing agents, irrespective of the type of fertility drugs used and duration of treatment. While results are generally reassuring, there is a clear need for larger studies employing longer periods of follow-up, detailing precisely the types, doses and duration of treatments patients have received, and controlling for potential confounding reproductive factors. While uncertainties persist, patients undergoing ovulation induction should be informed of the possible increased risk of ovarian cancer following treatment, but it should be emphasised that this risk is doubled at most. Short courses of ovulation induction are probably preferable but there is no evidence for post-treatment screening for ovarian cancer in these patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101089,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 131-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rigp.2005.06.002","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471769705000535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The possible link between ovulation-inducing agents and ovarian cancer has been the focus of considerable research effort over the past decade. Epidemiological studies addressing this issue have varied in their ability to achieve adequate sample sizes, obtain accurate measures of subfertility and fertility drug use, and eliminate potential bias due to confounding variables. Despite these methodological challenges, nulliparity has consistently been associated with increased rates of epithelial ovarian cancer. An additional modest effect of subfertility has been suggested by some studies, particularly among women who remain childless despite prolonged non-pharmacological attempts to conceive. Type of subfertility may also impact on ovarian cancer risk: ovulatory disorders, endometriosis and unexplained subfertility have all been associated with increased rates of the disease. However, most studies have shown no overall increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women exposed to ovulation-inducing agents, irrespective of the type of fertility drugs used and duration of treatment. While results are generally reassuring, there is a clear need for larger studies employing longer periods of follow-up, detailing precisely the types, doses and duration of treatments patients have received, and controlling for potential confounding reproductive factors. While uncertainties persist, patients undergoing ovulation induction should be informed of the possible increased risk of ovarian cancer following treatment, but it should be emphasised that this risk is doubled at most. Short courses of ovulation induction are probably preferable but there is no evidence for post-treatment screening for ovarian cancer in these patients.

上皮性卵巢癌与促排卵
促排卵剂和卵巢癌之间可能存在的联系在过去十年中一直是大量研究的焦点。针对这一问题的流行病学研究在获得足够的样本量、获得生育能力低下和生育药物使用的准确测量以及消除混杂变量造成的潜在偏差方面的能力各不相同。尽管存在这些方法学上的挑战,但未生育始终与上皮性卵巢癌的发病率增加有关。一些研究表明,生育能力低下的另一个适度影响,特别是对那些尽管长期非药物尝试怀孕但仍未生育的妇女。生育能力低下的类型也可能影响卵巢癌的风险:排卵障碍、子宫内膜异位症和不明原因的生育能力低下都与卵巢癌的发病率增加有关。然而,大多数研究表明,与使用的生育药物类型和治疗时间无关,暴露于促排卵药物的妇女患上皮性卵巢癌的风险总体上没有增加。虽然结果总体上令人放心,但显然需要进行更大规模的研究,采用更长时间的随访,精确地详细说明患者接受的治疗的类型、剂量和持续时间,并控制潜在的混杂生殖因素。虽然不确定性仍然存在,但应告知接受排卵诱导的患者治疗后卵巢癌的风险可能增加,但应强调这种风险最多增加一倍。短期促排卵可能是可取的,但没有证据表明这些患者在治疗后进行卵巢癌筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信