Ranking Hospital Hoteling Services from Patients’ Perspective Using Importance-Performance Analysis

Q3 Medicine
Amir Karimkhany, Ehsan Zarei, S. Arabi, E. Navvabi, Somayeh Anisi
{"title":"Ranking Hospital Hoteling Services from Patients’ Perspective Using Importance-Performance Analysis","authors":"Amir Karimkhany, Ehsan Zarei, S. Arabi, E. Navvabi, Somayeh Anisi","doi":"10.5812/semj-119702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: While the ultimate goal of health care is to maintain or improve the health status, features of care, including the quality of hotel services, are important to enhance the quality of health care services. Due to the limited resources of the health system, it is important to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of health service providers for policy-making and allocating resources in line with customers’ expectations. Objectives: The current study aimed at ranking the dimensions of hospital hoteling services from patients’ perspectives using the importance-performance analysis (IPA) method in Tehran, Iran. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 440 patients were enrolled through multi-stage random sampling. The data collection tool was a questionnaire consisting of 44 items in six dimensions. Its internal reliability was determined based on Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (α = 0.97). The IPA method was used to prioritize the dimensions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the paired t-test at a significance level of < 0.05. Results: In all aspects of hoteling, there was a significant difference between the performance of hospitals and the expectations of patients. The highest and lowest gaps between performance and expectation were related to the economic-financial and performance-process factors, respectively (P < 0.05). Based on the IPA matrix, the \"physical-structural\" and \"economic-financial\" factors were the major weaknesses, and the \"need to allocate more resources\" and \"human-behavioral\" factors were recognized as the most strong points. Considering that the dimensions of \"cultural-religious” and \"safety-security\" were located in the third quadrant of the IPA matrix, these dimensions did not require additional resources. Conclusions: The existence of a gap between hospital performance and patient expectation in all the hoteling dimensions indicated that the performance of hospitals in providing hoteling services was not proportional to the importance of these factors from the viewpoints of patients. The \"physical-structural\" and \"economic-financial\" factors were the major weaknesses of the hospitals studied. Therefore, it is necessary to pay more attention and allocate resources to these dimensions. Efforts should be continued to maintain and upgrade the status quo regarding the human-behavioral factors to boost patient satisfaction and improve the quality of hoteling services.","PeriodicalId":39157,"journal":{"name":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-119702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While the ultimate goal of health care is to maintain or improve the health status, features of care, including the quality of hotel services, are important to enhance the quality of health care services. Due to the limited resources of the health system, it is important to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of health service providers for policy-making and allocating resources in line with customers’ expectations. Objectives: The current study aimed at ranking the dimensions of hospital hoteling services from patients’ perspectives using the importance-performance analysis (IPA) method in Tehran, Iran. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 440 patients were enrolled through multi-stage random sampling. The data collection tool was a questionnaire consisting of 44 items in six dimensions. Its internal reliability was determined based on Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (α = 0.97). The IPA method was used to prioritize the dimensions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the paired t-test at a significance level of < 0.05. Results: In all aspects of hoteling, there was a significant difference between the performance of hospitals and the expectations of patients. The highest and lowest gaps between performance and expectation were related to the economic-financial and performance-process factors, respectively (P < 0.05). Based on the IPA matrix, the "physical-structural" and "economic-financial" factors were the major weaknesses, and the "need to allocate more resources" and "human-behavioral" factors were recognized as the most strong points. Considering that the dimensions of "cultural-religious” and "safety-security" were located in the third quadrant of the IPA matrix, these dimensions did not require additional resources. Conclusions: The existence of a gap between hospital performance and patient expectation in all the hoteling dimensions indicated that the performance of hospitals in providing hoteling services was not proportional to the importance of these factors from the viewpoints of patients. The "physical-structural" and "economic-financial" factors were the major weaknesses of the hospitals studied. Therefore, it is necessary to pay more attention and allocate resources to these dimensions. Efforts should be continued to maintain and upgrade the status quo regarding the human-behavioral factors to boost patient satisfaction and improve the quality of hoteling services.
基于重要性-绩效分析的患者视角下医院酒店服务排名
背景:虽然医疗保健的最终目的是维持或改善健康状况,但医疗保健的特点,包括酒店的服务质量,对于提高医疗保健服务的质量是很重要的。由于卫生系统的资源有限,重要的是要认识到卫生服务提供者的优势和劣势,以便根据客户的期望制定政策和分配资源。目的:本研究旨在利用重要性-绩效分析(IPA)方法,从患者的角度对伊朗德黑兰医院酒店服务的维度进行排名。方法:采用多阶段随机抽样方法,纳入440例横断面研究。数据收集工具为6个维度共44项的问卷调查。采用Cronbach 's α系数(α = 0.97)确定其内部信度。采用IPA法对各维度进行排序。资料分析采用描述性统计和配对t检验,显著性水平< 0.05。结果:在酒店的各个方面,医院的表现与患者的期望之间存在显著差异。绩效与期望差距最大、最小分别与经济财务因素和绩效过程因素有关(P < 0.05)。根据IPA矩阵,“物理-结构”和“经济-金融”因素是主要的弱点,“需要分配更多的资源”和“人-行为”因素被认为是最强大的优势。考虑到“文化-宗教”和“安全-保障”这两个方面位于国际音标矩阵的第三象限,这些方面不需要额外的资源。结论:医院绩效与患者期望在所有住宿维度上都存在差距,这表明医院提供住宿服务的绩效与这些因素在患者眼中的重要性不成正比。“物理-结构”和“经济-财务”因素是所研究医院的主要弱点。因此,有必要对这些方面给予更多的关注和分配资源。应继续努力维持和改善人的行为因素的现状,以提高患者的满意度,提高酒店的服务质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shiraz E Medical Journal
Shiraz E Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信