Generosity, Reputation, and Costly Signaling: A Preliminary Study of Altruism toward Unfamiliar People

Béla Birkás, T. Bereczkei, Z. Kerekes
{"title":"Generosity, Reputation, and Costly Signaling: A Preliminary Study of Altruism toward Unfamiliar People","authors":"Béla Birkás, T. Bereczkei, Z. Kerekes","doi":"10.1556/JCEP.4.2006.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generosity seems to be a cross-culturally ubiquitous feature of life. Helping others is considered as a costly act through which the altruists gain popularity and reputation in their refer- ence group and this elevated reputation will pay off for them in future social relationships. This costly signaling theory has been widely tested in pre-industrial societies. Our purpose was to ex- amine if the assumptions of CST are verifiable in modern, industrial societies. Using a complex experimental procedure with four subsequent phases we could examine reputation-gaining in real- istic conditions. We found that more people are willing to offer help to a charity organization when their group mates are aware of their altruistic intention than those whose offer was con- cealed from the rest of the group. In return, the offered charity service increased the altruist's reputation in the group; in the light of sociometric surveys they gained more popularity than the others. Finally, it turned out that whereas men are more likely to offer potential help in the pres- ence of others, women provide more actual help.","PeriodicalId":89409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cultural and evolutionary psychology","volume":"52 1","pages":"173-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cultural and evolutionary psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/JCEP.4.2006.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Generosity seems to be a cross-culturally ubiquitous feature of life. Helping others is considered as a costly act through which the altruists gain popularity and reputation in their refer- ence group and this elevated reputation will pay off for them in future social relationships. This costly signaling theory has been widely tested in pre-industrial societies. Our purpose was to ex- amine if the assumptions of CST are verifiable in modern, industrial societies. Using a complex experimental procedure with four subsequent phases we could examine reputation-gaining in real- istic conditions. We found that more people are willing to offer help to a charity organization when their group mates are aware of their altruistic intention than those whose offer was con- cealed from the rest of the group. In return, the offered charity service increased the altruist's reputation in the group; in the light of sociometric surveys they gained more popularity than the others. Finally, it turned out that whereas men are more likely to offer potential help in the pres- ence of others, women provide more actual help.
慷慨、声誉和昂贵信号:对不熟悉的人的利他主义的初步研究
慷慨似乎是跨文化生活中普遍存在的特征。帮助他人被认为是一种代价高昂的行为,通过这种行为,利他主义者在他们的参考群体中获得了知名度和声誉,而这种声誉的提高将在未来的社会关系中为他们带来回报。这种代价高昂的信号理论在前工业化社会得到了广泛的检验。我们的目的是检验CST的假设在现代工业社会中是否可以验证。通过一个包含四个后续阶段的复杂实验程序,我们可以在现实条件下检验声誉的获得。我们发现,当他们的同伴知道他们的利他意图时,更多人愿意向慈善组织提供帮助,而不是向其他群体隐瞒他们的利他意图。作为回报,提供的慈善服务增加了利他主义者在群体中的声誉;根据社会计量学调查,他们比其他人更受欢迎。最后,结果表明,男性更有可能在他人在场的情况下提供潜在的帮助,而女性提供更多的实际帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书