EPISODIC ISSUES «IN THE LIFE OF ST. DAVID GAREJELI»

Mikhaeil Khutsishvili, Miranda Todua
{"title":"EPISODIC ISSUES «IN THE LIFE OF ST. DAVID GAREJELI»","authors":"Mikhaeil Khutsishvili, Miranda Todua","doi":"10.56032/2523-4684.2022.3.3.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One episode of «the life of Saint David Garejeli» is discussed in the work, in which it is narrated how Saint David Garejeli (6th century) converted to Christ an unrighteous man named Bubakr, who threatened to kill David, but after a miracle performed by David, he turned to Christ. From the work, we can see that David speaks to Bubakr in Armenian, which indicates that Bubakr is Armenian. But the author only hints about the Armenianness of this person and does not say it directly. In the present work, the attention is focused on the fact that in the Middle Ages the word `Armenian', along with the ethnic one, also had a confessional meaning and that it was also used in the meaning of Monophysite. The authors of the article express the opinion that in the previous text, which the creator of «Life of St. David Garejeli» (10th century) relied on when writing his work, Bubakri was presented as a person of Monophysite confession. The text showed that the Monophysite was going to kill the holy monk and he changed his mind only after Bubakr and his son were cured of their illnesses by this monk. According to the authors of the article, as Monophysitism was presented in a negative context in the Bubakr episode, the creator of the new monument about St. David Garejeli did not mention the word «Armenian» at all. After the church split between them, they tried to repair the broken relationship, and presenting Monophysitism in a negative context would not contribute to the improvement of this relationship. Bubakr is presented as a positive person in the monument, it is shown that he showed strong faith in God and became a true Christian.","PeriodicalId":80750,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin - American Academy of Arts and Sciences. American Academy of Arts and Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin - American Academy of Arts and Sciences. American Academy of Arts and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56032/2523-4684.2022.3.3.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One episode of «the life of Saint David Garejeli» is discussed in the work, in which it is narrated how Saint David Garejeli (6th century) converted to Christ an unrighteous man named Bubakr, who threatened to kill David, but after a miracle performed by David, he turned to Christ. From the work, we can see that David speaks to Bubakr in Armenian, which indicates that Bubakr is Armenian. But the author only hints about the Armenianness of this person and does not say it directly. In the present work, the attention is focused on the fact that in the Middle Ages the word `Armenian', along with the ethnic one, also had a confessional meaning and that it was also used in the meaning of Monophysite. The authors of the article express the opinion that in the previous text, which the creator of «Life of St. David Garejeli» (10th century) relied on when writing his work, Bubakri was presented as a person of Monophysite confession. The text showed that the Monophysite was going to kill the holy monk and he changed his mind only after Bubakr and his son were cured of their illnesses by this monk. According to the authors of the article, as Monophysitism was presented in a negative context in the Bubakr episode, the creator of the new monument about St. David Garejeli did not mention the word «Armenian» at all. After the church split between them, they tried to repair the broken relationship, and presenting Monophysitism in a negative context would not contribute to the improvement of this relationship. Bubakr is presented as a positive person in the monument, it is shown that he showed strong faith in God and became a true Christian.
章节问题“在圣大卫·加雷耶利的生活”
在作品中讨论了“圣大卫·加雷耶利的生活”的一个情节,其中叙述了圣大卫·加雷耶利(6世纪)如何将一个名叫布巴克的不义的人皈依基督,他威胁要杀死大卫,但在大卫表演了一个奇迹之后,他转向了基督。从作品中,我们可以看到大卫用亚美尼亚语和布巴克说话,这表明布巴克是亚美尼亚人。但作者只是暗示了这个人的亚美尼亚性,并没有直接说出来。在目前的工作中,人们的注意力集中在这样一个事实上:在中世纪,“亚美尼亚人”这个词,连同种族这个词,也有忏悔的意思,它也被用于一性派的意思。这篇文章的作者表示,在之前的文本中,“St. David Garejeli的生活”(10世纪)的创造者在撰写他的作品时所依赖的文本中,Bubakri被呈现为一性派的人。文本显示,一性派要杀死圣僧,他改变了主意,直到布巴克和他的儿子的疾病被这位僧侣治愈。根据这篇文章的作者,由于在Bubakr事件中,一性论是在负面的背景下呈现的,所以关于St. David Garejeli的新纪念碑的创造者根本没有提到“亚美尼亚人”这个词。在他们之间的教会分裂后,他们试图修复破裂的关系,而在消极的背景下呈现一性论无助于改善这种关系。在纪念碑中,布拉克被描绘成一个积极的人,这表明他对上帝表现出强烈的信仰,成为一名真正的基督徒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书