Secukinumab in United States Biologic-Naïve Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled CHOICE Study

Q2 Medicine
Tien Q. Nguyen, M. Churchill, R. Levin, G. Valenzuela, J. Merola, A. Ogdie, A. Orbai, J. Scher, A. Kavanaugh, F. Kianifard, Chauncy Rollins, Renato Calheiros, O. Chambenoit
{"title":"Secukinumab in United States Biologic-Naïve Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled CHOICE Study","authors":"Tien Q. Nguyen, M. Churchill, R. Levin, G. Valenzuela, J. Merola, A. Ogdie, A. Orbai, J. Scher, A. Kavanaugh, F. Kianifard, Chauncy Rollins, Renato Calheiros, O. Chambenoit","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.210912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To evaluate secukinumab (SEC) 300 mg and 150 mg vs placebo in a United States–only population of biologic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods CHOICE was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in the US. Biologic-naïve patients with PsA and psoriasis (PsO) were randomized 2:2:1 to SEC 300 mg (n = 103), SEC 150 mg (n = 103), or placebo (n = 52). The primary objective was to show superiority of SEC 300 mg vs placebo in American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 16. Additional objectives included the effect of SEC on dactylitis, enthesitis, PsO, and safety. Results ACR20 response rates at week 16 were higher with SEC 300 mg than with placebo (51.5% vs 23.1%; odds ratio 3.51 [95% CI 1.65-7.45]; P = 0.001). SEC 300 mg also led to greater ACR50/70 responses and improvements in other variables vs placebo. Responses were generally sustained over time. Patients with inadequate response to SEC 150 mg at weeks 16, 28, or 40 who received dose escalation to 300 mg experienced improved clinical response after uptitration. The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infections and diarrhea. No inflammatory bowel disease was reported or new safety signals observed. Conclusion SEC 300 mg led to rapid and significant improvements over placebo in symptoms of PsA in this heavier population of US-only, biologic-naïve patients. Findings were consistent with previous studies and suggest that SEC 300 mg is a safe and efficacious first-line biologic treatment for patients with PsA. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02798211]","PeriodicalId":35278,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective To evaluate secukinumab (SEC) 300 mg and 150 mg vs placebo in a United States–only population of biologic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods CHOICE was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in the US. Biologic-naïve patients with PsA and psoriasis (PsO) were randomized 2:2:1 to SEC 300 mg (n = 103), SEC 150 mg (n = 103), or placebo (n = 52). The primary objective was to show superiority of SEC 300 mg vs placebo in American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 16. Additional objectives included the effect of SEC on dactylitis, enthesitis, PsO, and safety. Results ACR20 response rates at week 16 were higher with SEC 300 mg than with placebo (51.5% vs 23.1%; odds ratio 3.51 [95% CI 1.65-7.45]; P = 0.001). SEC 300 mg also led to greater ACR50/70 responses and improvements in other variables vs placebo. Responses were generally sustained over time. Patients with inadequate response to SEC 150 mg at weeks 16, 28, or 40 who received dose escalation to 300 mg experienced improved clinical response after uptitration. The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infections and diarrhea. No inflammatory bowel disease was reported or new safety signals observed. Conclusion SEC 300 mg led to rapid and significant improvements over placebo in symptoms of PsA in this heavier population of US-only, biologic-naïve patients. Findings were consistent with previous studies and suggest that SEC 300 mg is a safe and efficacious first-line biologic treatment for patients with PsA. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02798211]
Secukinumab在美国Biologic-Naïve银屑病关节炎患者中的应用:来自随机、安慰剂对照的CHOICE研究结果
目的评价secukinumab (SEC) 300 mg和150 mg与安慰剂在美国银屑病关节炎(PsA) biologic-naïve患者中的疗效。方法选择是一项在美国进行的双盲、随机对照试验。Biologic-naïve PsA和银屑病(PsO)患者以2:2:1随机分配至SEC 300 mg (n = 103), SEC 150 mg (n = 103)或安慰剂(n = 52)。主要目的是在第16周美国风湿病学会20% (ACR20)应答中显示SEC 300 mg优于安慰剂。其他目标包括SEC对指炎、鼻炎、PsO和安全性的影响。结果:SEC 300 mg组第16周的ACR20缓解率高于安慰剂组(51.5% vs 23.1%;优势比3.51 [95% CI 1.65-7.45];P = 0.001)。与安慰剂相比,SEC 300 mg也导致了更大的ACR50/70反应和其他变量的改善。反应通常持续一段时间。在第16周、28周或40周对150mg SEC反应不足的患者接受剂量增加至300mg后,临床反应得到改善。最常见的不良反应是上呼吸道感染和腹泻。没有炎症性肠病的报道或观察到新的安全性信号。结论:与安慰剂相比,SEC 300 mg可快速显著改善美国超重人群biologic-naïve患者的PsA症状。研究结果与先前的研究一致,表明SEC 300 mg是PsA患者安全有效的一线生物治疗方法。[ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02798211]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement
The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Duncan A. Gordon, The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 36 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信